• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

News

Don't Say Goodbye To HD DVD, Yet

Opinion - CES was unkind to HD DVD this year, but don't underestimate the power of the fledgling format. Read more

Apacer Mixes Fast SLC with MLC Flash on a Single Drive

Single-Level Cell flash memory (SLC) is fast and expensive, so Multi-level Cell flash (MLC) makes more sense to reach high capacities. Apacer now mixes both types to combine capacity and performance on a single drive. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Dead Space: Performance Analyzed

Dead Space: Performance Analyzed

Dead Space is an excellent sci-fi survival horror title, and one of the few games that Nvidia supports with its new driver's ambient occlusion feature. We put the game through our usual image-quality and performance tests to see what we could learn. Read more

Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Power Versus Performance

Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Power Versus Performance

Intel's fastest Core 2 Duo, the E8600, runs at 3.33 GHz. But if you're a performance-hungry power user, we found that you can actually increase the chip's efficiency by overclocking it, thanks to 45 nm manufacturing and plenty of built-in headroom. Read more

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Life At 2 GT/s: 6 GB DDR3-2000 Memory Kits Compared

Memory vendors put a lot of effort into drumming up excitement over high-end memory kits, but many of those products turn out to be vaporware. We test six DDR3-2000 kits that enthusiasts can actually buy today, and push them as far as they'll go. Read more

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 Memory Scaling On AMD's Phenom II X4

DDR3 memory is available in speeds ranging from DDR3-800 to DDR3-2133. Which is the best memory choice for AMD’s Phenom II X4? We tested as many speeds as possible using aggressive and conservative timings to find the sweet spot for your next build. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles

Pathetic.... truly pathetic

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Is Sharikou a biased AMD fanboi?




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote
Word :    Username :           
 

Has anyone checked out http://sharikou.blogspot.com/ lately? It's rather laughable of late. He' got amateurish "joke" transcripts up on his site detailing what he wishes was happening in an environment that he seems totally out of touch with. He's also going on about how good AM2 and how it's going to rule the world and eat the first born child of every Intel employee as well as eliminating world hunger when if the all of the benchmarks and tests done on Conroe so far indicate that it will be nothing short of earth shattering and will take the performance crown back comfortably from AMD who have held the performance crown for a fair while now.

P.S Why is it when I try to post a comment on his site pointing out an error or a shortcoming in one of his stories (They're not factual enough to be close to being called an article) he doesn't publish it and prefers to publish the comments of those who profess their willingness to take his hand in marriage.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I would'nt say a fanboy but more like biased towards amd.

Reply to dvdpiddy

Couldn't care less about that.

Reply to Anonymous

Ehh let's just ignore him ok?

Reply to dvdpiddy

Quote :

Couldn't care less about that.

Nor could I, but I just had to point out how pleasing it is to see that phrase used correctly for once...

Reply to ChipDeath

All of your poll responses are positive, not negative, thus resulting in only one outcome.

However, that being said, yes, he is an AMD fan"boi" (what are you, an Avril Lavgne fan?). No matter what news comes out he spins it and then regurgitates it out with as a positive for AMD.

Don't like it? Don't read it! I like to read his "blog" (I hate blogs) but I do so with a grain of salt.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

Quote :

Has anyone checked out http://sharikou.blogspot.com/ lately? It's rather laughable of late. He' got amateurish "joke" transcripts up on his site detailing what he wishes was happening in an environment that he seems totally out of touch with. He's also going on about how good AM2 and how it's going to rule the world and eat the first born child of every Intel employee as well as eliminating world hunger when if the all of the benchmarks and tests done on Conroe so far indicate that it will be nothing short of earth shattering and will take the performance crown back comfortably from AMD who have held the performance crown for a fair while now.

P.S Why is it when I try to post a comment on his site pointing out an error or a shortcoming in one of his stories (They're not factual enough to be close to being called an article) he doesn't publish it and prefers to publish the comments of those who profess their willingness to take his hand in marriage.



I don't know man, seems like you got an issue with this guy. Did he kick your dog? Steal you girl? Kill you in a past life? What the f~ck do you care what he puts in his blog? More so, why do you feel the need to point out errors or a shortcoming?

Relax, have a Foster's, and throw few more shrimp on the barbee...also, can you add "I don't give a flying f~ck" as a voting option?

Reply to chunkymonster

Quote :

Has anyone checked out http://sharikou.blogspot.com/ lately? It's rather laughable of late. He' got amateurish "joke" transcripts up on his site detailing what he wishes was happening in an environment that he seems totally out of touch with. He's also going on about how good AM2 and how it's going to rule the world and eat the first born child of every Intel employee as well as eliminating world hunger when if the all of the benchmarks and tests done on Conroe so far indicate that it will be nothing short of earth shattering and will take the performance crown back comfortably from AMD who have held the performance crown for a fair while now.

P.S Why is it when I try to post a comment on his site pointing out an error or a shortcoming in one of his stories (They're not factual enough to be close to being called an article) he doesn't publish it and prefers to publish the comments of those who profess their willingness to take his hand in marriage.



I don't know man, seems like you got an issue with this guy. Did he kick your dog? Steal you girl? Kill you in a past life? What the f~ck do you care what he puts in his blog? More so, why do you feel the need to point out errors or a shortcoming?

Relax, have a Foster's, and throw few more shrimp on the barbee... Maybe jealous?

Reply to dvdpiddy

Quote :

All of your poll responses are positive, not negative, thus resulting in only one outcome.

However, that being said, yes, he is an AMD fan"boi" (what are you, an Avril Lavgne fan?). No matter what news comes out he spins it and then regurgitates it out with as a positive for AMD.

Don't like it? Don't read it! I like to read his "blog" (I hate blogs) but I do so with a grain of salt.



Umm... I think that was the point. Personally, I found it humorous.

Reply to rodney_ws
- 0 +

Quote :

All of your poll responses are positive, not negative, thus resulting in only one outcome.

However, that being said, yes, he is an AMD fan"boi" (what are you, an Avril Lavgne fan?). No matter what news comes out he spins it and then regurgitates it out with as a positive for AMD.

Don't like it? Don't read it! I like to read his "blog" (I hate blogs) but I do so with a grain of salt.



Umm... I think that was the point. Personally, I found it humorous.

Yes. That was the point :roll:

Reply to 306maxi

Oh now i get it. :lol:

Reply to dvdpiddy

Quote :

Has anyone checked out http://sharikou.blogspot.com/ lately? It's rather laughable of late. He' got amateurish "joke" transcripts up on his site detailing what he wishes was happening in an environment that he seems totally out of touch with. He's also going on about how good AM2 and how it's going to rule the world and eat the first born child of every Intel employee as well as eliminating world hunger when if the all of the benchmarks and tests done on Conroe so far indicate that it will be nothing short of earth shattering and will take the performance crown back comfortably from AMD who have held the performance crown for a fair while now.

P.S Why is it when I try to post a comment on his site pointing out an error or a shortcoming in one of his stories (They're not factual enough to be close to being called an article) he doesn't publish it and prefers to publish the comments of those who profess their willingness to take his hand in marriage.





You may not agree with him but even Rahu Sood's blog (VooDooPC) will publish Sharikou's posts. He may seem biased against Intel if you're biased against AMD, but at least he does have techinical reasoning behind what he says.

The biggest thing I've heard from him is that multitasking with large mem sets will be poor. I don't know, but wow, couldn't you have posted something about AM2?

Even if it was to say that it's not catching Core2.

Reply to BaronMatrix

Quote :

All of your poll responses are positive, not negative, thus resulting in only one outcome.

However, that being said, yes, he is an AMD fan"boi" (what are you, an Avril Lavgne fan?). No matter what news comes out he spins it and then regurgitates it out with as a positive for AMD.

Don't like it? Don't read it! I like to read his "blog" (I hate blogs) but I do so with a grain of salt.



Umm... I think that was the point. Personally, I found it humorous.

Yes. That was the point :roll:

Yes, I was being sarcastic. Now if you were being sarcastic too that would be funny. You could reply back, "So was I.". But I hope you weren't being sarcastic, because then I'd look like a jerk.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

It's a blog; I wouldn't take any of what he says seriously.

Reply to Heyyou27

Why even bother to let anyone know about it ? There's enough Extremism in the world now of all types, that's NOT why I come to this Forum.
AMD Queda, Intel Queda, Al Queda, Nvidia Queda, ATI Queda, you all suck and should be packed up and flown into the Sun.
It's bad enough that most of these guys only look at the pictures in articles, and think they know everything, I grow weary of Morons, anymore posts or blogs like that just keep to yourself.
No, I didn't read it either.

Reply to MasterLee
- 0 +

Quote :

All of your poll responses are positive, not negative, thus resulting in only one outcome.

However, that being said, yes, he is an AMD fan"boi" (what are you, an Avril Lavgne fan?). No matter what news comes out he spins it and then regurgitates it out with as a positive for AMD.

Don't like it? Don't read it! I like to read his "blog" (I hate blogs) but I do so with a grain of salt.



Umm... I think that was the point. Personally, I found it humorous.

Yes. That was the point :roll:

Yes, I was being sarcastic. Now if you were being sarcastic too that would be funny. You could reply back, "So was I.". But I hope you weren't being sarcastic, because then I'd look like a jerk.

I'm not sure. I'm more confused now than anything else :P

Reply to 306maxi

Quote :

I'm not sure. I'm more confused now than anything else :P


Thats what you get for posting in the cpu section during the conroe wars.

Reply to dvdpiddy

Just taking a look at that site, i can see where MMM gets his temper problem from.

Reply to TheMaster
- 0 +

Quote :

You may not agree with him but even Rahu Sood's blog (VooDooPC) will publish Sharikou's posts. He may seem biased against Intel if you're biased against AMD, but at least he does have techinical reasoning behind what he says.



He claims Yonah is 50W. Sure, people have technical reasoning, but as seen from him, some are so wrong.

Yea, I agree this is useless thread though.

Reply to DavidC1
- 0 +

Quote :

You may not agree with him but even Rahu Sood's blog (VooDooPC) will publish Sharikou's posts. He may seem biased against Intel if you're biased against AMD, but at least he does have techinical reasoning behind what he says.



He claims Yonah is 50W. Sure, people have technical reasoning, but as seen from him, some are so wrong.

Yea, I agree this is useless thread though.

Wasn't really meant to be a useful thread. Just one for ragging some stupid Blogger :)

Reply to 306maxi
- 0 +

Who would forget how to spell his name after his singing career! He is Shakira right????? Like after she became a guy? 8O

Reply to 306maxi
- 0 +

If Shakira changed to a man, and had a crush for me, I would become a homosexual and happily perform my duties!!!

Reply to RichPLS
- 0 +

Quote :

If Shakira changed to a man, and had a crush for me, I would become a homosexual and happily perform my duties!!!



Can I ask for my own thread to be closed down? :?

That's just creepy :P

Reply to 306maxi

Quote :

If Shakira changed to a man, and had a crush for me, I would become a homosexual and happily perform my duties!!!



Can I ask for my own thread to be closed down? :?

That's just creepy :P

You started it and now you can't take the heat. Poor planning.

Rich: sorry to hear about that.

Reply to clue69less
- 0 +

Well 'twas merely a joke.

At least we can draw one conclusion from this thread. Shakira is a biased AMD fanboi! Or is that bisexual AMD fanboi?

Reply to 306maxi
- 0 +

Sharikou is a genius. You're all a bunch of idiots if you think he is a fanboy. Sharikou simply analyzes the information and presents logical conclusions. There is no fanboyism in that. Get a clue.

Reply to PENIX
- 0 +

Quote :

Sharikou is a genius. You're all a bunch of idiots if you think he is a fanboy. Sharikou simply analyzes the information and presents logical conclusions. There is no fanboyism in that. Get a clue.




Talk about blast from the past! It's not Sharikou. It's Shakira.... and I predict you'll BK within 3 seconds. :lol:

Reply to 306maxi
- 0 +

Right I would take Shakira any way she was!!!

http://www.bartcop.com/shakira-hips-lie%20.jpg

http://www.skinz.org/celebrity/shakira/shakira-wallpapers-1.jpg

http://gfx.download-by.net/screen/306/306877-shakira-sexy-hot-screensaver.jpg

http://harvey.harker.org/u/harker/nicholasr/assignments/shakira32.jpg

http://www.bbspot.com/Images/News_Features/2003/06/shakira.jpg

http://gfx.download-by.net/screen/159/159636-shakira-screen-saver.jpg


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g142/montchan/ShakiraGoatsm.jpg
And I did not forget about you NZ'rs Wusy.... Here is your pinup gal...

Reply to RichPLS
- 0 +

Where to start... I think I'll start when I was teaching at a computer college last year - Not that that makes me an über-guru or anything like that - and one of my students cited references in Sharikou's blog supporting her argument in favour of AMD. I might add that this was the first time I'd ever heard of Conroe.

So I followed the references in her assignment, and just to start off with, the way the bugger writes his little fairy-tales clearly shows his utter refusal to admit that Intel can surpass AMD - but he's proclaiming the superiority of AMD around every corner, ridicule or no. You almost have to admire such dedication in the face of adversity, until you realise that it is blatant fanaticism. This is the same kind of scum that'll fly a Boeing into a building, for an ideal.

Anyway. Trying to be dispassionate here. I read these 'articles', found almost no supporting references in said articles, and discovered that the sod only publishes comments showing him and/or AMD in a favourable light.

Taking it further, I followed another of this student's references (Tom's Hardware Guide, of all places) and - surprise! - here's Sharikou again, on the forumz, making itself a damn nuisance. Then things got interesting.

I baled onto the Intel and AMD sites, then onto a whole bunch of other (notably independent) sources for tech news relating to the CPU wars (which I actually stopped following in 2001, when I finished school), and discovered that - on paper - Intel's Conroe could maybe overtake AMD's best.

When it was released, it did. AMD had lost the performance crown, most people agreed on this, and here this idiot blathering on about AMD this and AMD that and Intel sucks...

So. One particular bit out of said fanatic's blog I particularly remember was when he was blathering on about two PCs side-by-side in a shop, one with a Conroe chip and one with the current AMD big boy. He wiggled the mouse and played around on both, and noted a marked delay on things like right-click menus on the Core2. Based on this and this alone was a blog entry resembling a rant about how pathetically lousy the Conroe was blah blah blah *vomits*.

I had just one question about that blog entry, which I'd posted on the blog (with my email address I might add) and which - somehow - never got published or even answered. That question ran as follows: 'Hi, I'd just like to know one thing, how is it that a PC shop is selling Conroe-based systems when the thing is only due for release in a month's time? Either post your answer on your blog, or drop me a line at mugz@(email address). Thank you.' Never got an answer.

Sharikou isn't a fanboy, I agree. You're a total idiot if you think that he is a genius, though. Sharikou simply analyzes the information he makes up and presents illogical conclusions. There is no fanboyism in that, only delusion, rabid fanaticism, and idiocy. Get a grip.

Oh, and someone who believes what this zealot writes is either blind, stupid, or both.

Thank you for your time, ladies and gentlemen, and for our next act we'll have... *peers closely at program* ...some idiot screaming about naked women.

Reply to Mugz

Mugz wrote :

Thank you for your time, ladies and gentlemen, and for our next act we'll have... *peers closely at program* ...some idiot screaming about naked women.

 


 


*Obliges.*

 

WHY ARE NAKED WOMEN ALWAYS NUDE???

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by exit2dos on 07-14-2007 at 12:40:13 AM
------------------------------ Hey baby, do you work for Intel? 'Cause you got "Fine" written all over you.
Reply to exit2dos
- 0 +

exit2dos wrote :

*Obliges.*



-5 Thread revival points :non:

Reply to BigMac
- 0 +

Why oh why was this revived? *sigh*

Reply to Mugz

Mugz wrote :

Why oh why was this revived? *sigh*




I noticed that you waited 3 days before making a revival comment. [/ironic]

*Tries for more negative points.*

 


------------------------------ Hey baby, do you work for Intel? 'Cause you got "Fine" written all over you.
Reply to exit2dos
- 0 +

I'll give you some more if you start adding them to your signature.

Reply to BigMac
- 0 +

[bump]

------------------------------ http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/turpit/SIG2A.jpg
Reply to turpit

[& Grind]

------------------------------ When you get to the right place, with the right people, quarter this. You know, this could be the right place. The time's running out.
Reply to audiovoodoo
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Tom's Hardware Forum related > TG Forumz - Other Discussions > Pathetic.... truly pathetic
Go to:

There are 1148 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links