Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)
"Steve Simpson"
> Abit KV7 motherboard with 1GB DDR333 RAM
> Athlon XP3000+ processor
> ATI 9600 Pro 128MB 8x AGP gfx card.
>
> what would be a suitable upgrade to the graphics card to improve flight
> simulator.
Jeez.. what's the problem? Half the people in this group would kill for
your computer.
Seriously, you should be able to run with most things maxed out - what is
the problem?
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)
Dallas wrote:
> Jeez.. what's the problem? Half the people in this group would kill for
> your computer.
>
> Seriously, you should be able to run with most things maxed out - what is
> the problem?
>
> Dallas
>
>
"Steve Simpson" <stevieiz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news07sr2$8rp$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
>I currently have the following system;
>
> Abit KV7 motherboard with 1GB DDR333 RAM
> Athlon XP3000+ processor
> ATI 9600 Pro 128MB 8x AGP gfx card.
>
> what would be a suitable upgrade to the graphics card to improve flight
> simulator.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:40:54 -0000, "Steve Simpson"
<stevieiz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I currently have the following system;
>
>Abit KV7 motherboard with 1GB DDR333 RAM
>Athlon XP3000+ processor
>ATI 9600 Pro 128MB 8x AGP gfx card.
>
>what would be a suitable upgrade to the graphics card to improve flight
>simulator.
>
>Thanks
>
January 2005 Issue of Computer Pilot Magazine tested about 35 video
cars and compared one against the other. Top 4 ratings went to
GeForce 6800 Ultra
GeForce 6800 GT
X800 XTPE
Radeon 9800 Pro256
With the same setup, frame rates varied from a low of about 8 FPS to a
high of over 80. If I were buying a card, I would get a copy of this
issue and see where the one I wanted to purchase, ranks.
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)
Bob Cordone wrote:
> January 2005 Issue of Computer Pilot Magazine tested about 35 video
> cars and compared one against the other. Top 4 ratings went to
> GeForce 6800 Ultra
> GeForce 6800 GT
> X800 XTPE
> Radeon 9800 Pro256
>
> With the same setup, frame rates varied from a low of about 8 FPS to a
> high of over 80. If I were buying a card, I would get a copy of this
> issue and see where the one I wanted to purchase, ranks.
>
> www.computerpilot.com >
>
>
> Bob
Guess what? I have what can at best be described as an average system -
512 MB RAM, 2.6 GHz P4, ATI Radeon 9000 - and I just tried cranking
/all/ the detail options up. It ran smooth as poo.
Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:40:54 -0000, "Steve Simpson"
<stevieiz@hotmail.com> brought the following to our attention:
>I currently have the following system;
>
>Abit KV7 motherboard with 1GB DDR333 RAM
>Athlon XP3000+ processor
>ATI 9600 Pro 128MB 8x AGP gfx card.
>
>what would be a suitable upgrade to the graphics card to improve flight
>simulator.
>
>Thanks
>
That would be an AMD 3GHz nominal clock speed CPU? and a 128MB
forced-air cooled video card? Amazing!! Now I'm going to be a wise
guy and describe my `upgraded' video card... yeah in 1998.. it was
upgraded. First have a look at these images..
Can you tell what Sim platform is running?? well it's a 0.5GHz P3's
with 32MB nVidia Riva TNT2. Ya' know what graphics card that is?
It's a Diamond Viper 770!! Are you having more fun with 3.0GHz?
Probably a little more fun than here. How's that for squeezing the
last drops out of minimalist hardware? Has clouds, AI, and 1280x
1024 display screen. Notice the trade-offs? Oh yeah.. it's FS2002.
Am planning to get a new Sim box?? Not anytime soon.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.