Ok that conclusion did not go with the data... i read the article thoughly, and overall the ati chipset performed just as well with close-to all, if not all, of the benchmarks.... you have to remember they were comparing 2 different generations of GPU's and those benchmarks are the only ones where the ati fell behind because the card being used was 1 year old, compared against a 3 month old card??? come on arent you supposed to compare the memory, cpu, synthetic also??
PS. - I AM BIASED TO NVidia myself and i thought that conclusion was extremely biased
Comments Anyone?
PS. - I AM BIASED TO NVidia myself and i thought that conclusion was extremely biased
Comments Anyone?