Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Patrick Schmid is the shame of Tom's hardware

Last response: in CPUs
Share
December 4, 2005 4:41:59 AM

Have you read the new article
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered"

It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read

Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph

Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
December 4, 2005 5:16:39 AM

Can you be any more vague?
December 4, 2005 5:26:09 AM

Put the blame where it belongs. News media has editors for a reason.
Related resources
December 4, 2005 6:03:22 AM

Quote:
Put the blame where it belongs. News media has editors for a reason.


News media HAVE editors for a reason
December 4, 2005 6:43:49 AM

Quote:
Put the blame where it belongs. News media has editors for a reason.


News media HAVE editors for a reason

You forgot a period at the end of the sentence.
December 4, 2005 6:49:40 AM

We are all glad that somone here will make sure that Patick will stop making stupid mistakes before he posts.
December 4, 2005 8:11:19 AM

Why can't you let me have my moment? I ma just a lonely pathetic loser....let me have my online burns and ownages.
December 4, 2005 8:49:59 AM

Go ahead, liver and prostate.
We are all gods creationses anyways.
December 4, 2005 9:02:57 AM

Either yuo are stoned....or i should be to read that message.....
December 4, 2005 9:27:18 AM

Now dont' start with me you bastad!
The revenge will be all mine, you see.
December 4, 2005 9:37:25 AM

Um....no
December 4, 2005 9:53:57 AM

No WHAT! Try to make up your mind.
This is CPU forum after all. This is not the Other forum, you know.


[/quote]
December 4, 2005 10:11:42 AM

Um.....yes?
December 4, 2005 11:31:18 AM

Yes is a good answer, thank you. You were right all along, after all.
December 4, 2005 12:09:31 PM

Um.....7?
December 4, 2005 9:14:04 PM

I'm sure I ment 3rd person singular, but then maybe I've been had.
December 5, 2005 12:50:12 AM

AMD paid wolf packs get fidgety everytime pro-Intel news is published.

and as usual they can't point to one item that support the title of this thread.
December 5, 2005 1:33:24 AM

notice how this thread had nothing to do with amd. see, not getting laid even makes you hallucinate. im sure youd stop trolling once you get laid.
December 5, 2005 1:40:56 AM

That was a very productive, and informative read. Thank you, thank you all.
December 5, 2005 12:40:56 PM

Quote:
Can you be any more vague?


Just to illustrate

In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes
December 5, 2005 4:19:26 PM

I'm sure we can all agree that you have never made a typo... Can't we?

Oh wait, I guess we can't.

Quote:
Have you read the new article
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered""


No question mark or punctuation.

Quote:
It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read


"Inconsistancy?" And again, no punctuation.

Quote:
Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph


Surely you mean, "detailed and specific enough..." as well as, "put a lot of unrelated..." and again, no PUNCTUATION!

Quote:
Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site


Wait, I thought we were discussing Patrick's problems. Who is this Patick guy? Even so, don't you mean "Please use a table" and "definitely" ?

Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.

Steele
December 5, 2005 5:02:32 PM

Quote:
Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.
Yeah, but one of them is a paid 'professional' (though in Patrick's case I use that term very loosely) writer and the other is just some random Joe Blow with grammar problems. There's a pretty significant difference there. :lol:  :lol:  :lol: 
December 5, 2005 5:05:38 PM

Quote:
I'm sure I ment 3rd person singular, but then maybe I've been had.
I think you had it right. Had you said "news media sites" then it would be "have", but you made it singular instead of plural, so it's "has". At least I think that's how it works. :?
December 5, 2005 5:24:40 PM

Quote:
Can you be any more vague?


Just to illustrate

In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes

DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.

and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.
July 20, 2009 3:00:57 PM

Do you have an update for Windows7 Pro 64-bit vs. XP pro 64bit SP3 for the same benchmarks and applications as this article:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xp-vs-vista,1531-6....



Schmide said:
Quote:
Can you be any more vague?


Just to illustrate

In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes

DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.

and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.

July 20, 2009 3:33:22 PM

July 20, 2009 7:54:53 PM

chikatana said:
Have you read the new article
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered"

It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read

Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph

Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site


You must be the shame of your spelling class. :lol: 
!