Patrick Schmid is the shame of Tom's hardware

Can you be any more vague?

Put the blame where it belongs. News media has editors for a reason.

News media HAVE editors for a reason

News media HAVE editors for a reason

You forgot a period at the end of the sentence.

We are all glad that somone here will make sure that Patick will stop making stupid mistakes before he posts.

Owned.

Why can't you let me have my moment? I ma just a lonely pathetic loser....let me have my online burns and ownages.

Go ahead, liver and prostate.
We are all gods creationses anyways.

Either yuo are stoned....or i should be to read that message.....

Now dont' start with me you bastad!
The revenge will be all mine, you see.

Um....no

No WHAT! Try to make up your mind.
This is CPU forum after all. This is not the Other forum, you know.


[/quote]

Um.....yes?

Yes is a good answer, thank you. You were right all along, after all.

Um.....7?

I'm sure I ment 3rd person singular, but then maybe I've been had.

AMD paid wolf packs get fidgety everytime pro-Intel news is published.

and as usual they can't point to one item that support the title of this thread.

notice how this thread had nothing to do with amd. see, not getting laid even makes you hallucinate. im sure youd stop trolling once you get laid.

That was a very productive, and informative read. Thank you, thank you all.

Just to illustrate

In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes

I'm sure we can all agree that you have never made a typo... Can't we?

Oh wait, I guess we can't.



No question mark or punctuation.



"Inconsistancy?" And again, no punctuation.



Surely you mean, "detailed and specific enough..." as well as, "put a lot of unrelated..." and again, no PUNCTUATION!



Wait, I thought we were discussing Patrick's problems. Who is this Patick guy? Even so, don't you mean "Please use a table" and "definitely" ?

Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.

Steele

Yeah, but one of them is a paid 'professional' (though in Patrick's case I use that term very loosely) writer and the other is just some random Joe Blow with grammar problems. There's a pretty significant difference there.      

I think you had it right. Had you said "news media sites" then it would be "have", but you made it singular instead of plural, so it's "has". At least I think that's how it works. :?

Just to illustrate

In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...

and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes

DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.

and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.

Do you have an update for Windows7 Pro 64-bit vs. XP pro 64bit SP3 for the same benchmarks and applications as this article:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xp-vs-vista,1531-6....

You must be the shame of your spelling class.  

When you're at work and bored, it is fun to go see these threads and give them some cyber-CPR.  

I like that one. Might keep it for the future.