Patrick Schmid is the shame of Tom's hardware
Tags:
-
CPUs
- Tom's Hardware
-
Processors
-
Intel
Last response: in CPUs
chikatana
December 4, 2005 4:41:59 AM
Have you read the new article
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered"
It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read
Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph
Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered"
It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read
Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph
Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
More about : patrick schmid shame tom hardware
dhlucke
December 4, 2005 5:16:39 AM
endyen
December 4, 2005 5:26:09 AM
Related resources
- Patrick Schmid's Article - Forum
- Patrick Schmid has no place writing of platforms! - Forum
- Could somebody please just shoot Patrick Schmid? - Forum
pickxx
December 4, 2005 6:03:22 AM
dhlucke
December 4, 2005 6:43:49 AM
intelamduser
December 4, 2005 6:49:40 AM
Action_Man
December 4, 2005 7:13:10 AM
pickxx
December 4, 2005 8:11:19 AM
Era
December 4, 2005 8:49:59 AM
pickxx
December 4, 2005 9:02:57 AM
Era
December 4, 2005 9:27:18 AM
pickxx
December 4, 2005 9:37:25 AM
Era
December 4, 2005 9:53:57 AM
pickxx
December 4, 2005 10:11:42 AM
Era
December 4, 2005 11:31:18 AM
pickxx
December 4, 2005 12:09:31 PM
endyen
December 4, 2005 9:14:04 PM
AmdMELTDOWN
December 5, 2005 12:50:12 AM
julius
December 5, 2005 1:33:24 AM
offgreen
December 5, 2005 1:40:56 AM
chikatana
December 5, 2005 12:40:56 PM
Quote:
Can you be any more vague?Just to illustrate
In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes
Steele
December 5, 2005 4:19:26 PM
I'm sure we can all agree that you have never made a typo... Can't we?
Oh wait, I guess we can't.
"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered""
No question mark or punctuation.
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read
"Inconsistancy?" And again, no punctuation.
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph
Surely you mean, "detailed and specific enough..." as well as, "put a lot of unrelated..." and again, no PUNCTUATION!
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
Wait, I thought we were discussing Patrick's problems. Who is this Patick guy? Even so, don't you mean "Please use a table" and "definitely" ?
Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.
Steele
Oh wait, I guess we can't.
Quote:
Have you read the new article "Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered""
No question mark or punctuation.
Quote:
It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read
"Inconsistancy?" And again, no punctuation.
Quote:
Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph
Surely you mean, "detailed and specific enough..." as well as, "put a lot of unrelated..." and again, no PUNCTUATION!
Quote:
Patick Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
Wait, I thought we were discussing Patrick's problems. Who is this Patick guy? Even so, don't you mean "Please use a table" and "definitely" ?
Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.
Steele
slvr_phoenix
December 5, 2005 5:02:32 PM
Quote:
Not that I'm saying that Patrick never makes mistakes. Everyone does that. I'm just saying that you should ease off. He's just as much a human as you are.
slvr_phoenix
December 5, 2005 5:05:38 PM
Schmide
December 5, 2005 5:24:40 PM
Quote:
Can you be any more vague?Just to illustrate
In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes
DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.
and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.
orangemetals
July 20, 2009 3:00:57 PM
Do you have an update for Windows7 Pro 64-bit vs. XP pro 64bit SP3 for the same benchmarks and applications as this article:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xp-vs-vista,1531-6....
Just to illustrate
In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes
DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.
and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/xp-vs-vista,1531-6....
Schmide said:
Quote:
Can you be any more vague?Just to illustrate
In this page, Kentsfield is said to be the first desktop quad-core
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and then lets look at the first row of the table of this page
Kentsfield is now a dual-core processor
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/top_secret_int...
and this is only one of the examples
just try to compare the content in the paragraph and the tables
you will found some more stupid mistakes
DUH! By definition he can't call it a quad core processor since it's a dual core multi chip package. Exactly what it is. Oh and btw these articles are translated versions off the German site, so expect some slight problems.
and Schmide != Schmid if you were wondering.
B-Unit
July 20, 2009 3:33:22 PM
jcknouse
July 20, 2009 7:54:53 PM
chikatana said:
Have you read the new article"Top Secret Intel Processor Plans Uncovered"
It is full of stupid errors and inconsistancy
I have been reading Toms's site for many years
and this article is the worst I've ever read
Articles by Patrick are always not detail and specific enough
they are also poorly organised and putting a lot of unrelated information into a single paragraph
Patick
Please use table to present details
and make sure your article is free from mistakes before posting it
or you will definitly be the shame of this site
You must be the shame of your spelling class.
jcknouse
July 20, 2009 7:58:11 PM
When you're at work and bored, it is fun to go see these threads and give them some cyber-CPR.
I like that one. Might keep it for the future.
!