This post is referencing the "Stress Test: Power Supplies Under Full Load" article on tom's, specifically the following link:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/07/11/stress_test/page10.html
I happened to buy this power supply prior to this article. I want to make a couple quick assumptions, I assume the article references the non-EPS version, and secondly, I assume that even though the "Nvidia SLI Ready" logo is a new thing, that versions of this power supply bought before this label existed, would also have received the same Nvidia logo if it had existed previously.
Anyways, I wanted a clarification on a point in the article, specifically:
Could someone seek to clarify the bold/italized part of the above quote in layman's terms? I've had extremely bad experiences with power supplies in the past, and I was hoping this power supply would be very stable as I plan to make another go at overclocking my system soon and I am a stability freak. I expect prime95 and 3dmark 2k1 loops to be able to run at least for 48 hours with no errors, as well as the same from memtest86.
Thanks again. Oh and first post!
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/07/11/stress_test/page10.html
I happened to buy this power supply prior to this article. I want to make a couple quick assumptions, I assume the article references the non-EPS version, and secondly, I assume that even though the "Nvidia SLI Ready" logo is a new thing, that versions of this power supply bought before this label existed, would also have received the same Nvidia logo if it had existed previously.
Anyways, I wanted a clarification on a point in the article, specifically:
Important Update - Antec technicians from Taiwan and the USA visited the Munich THG laboratory for just this purpose. The reason for the 3-hour visit was the divergences we discovered in the ripple test, which were not within spec - although the power supplies did not fail. The technicians from Antec performed new ripple tests on their power supplies together with the THG laboratory engineers. It turned out that the tolerances and high-frequency vibrations with their PSU can lead to varying results in the ripple tests. However, we didn't observe this phenomenon in any of the other candidates.
Because we determined that the ripple tests can remain entirely within spec in the present models and that the other values were flawless, the Antec devices still earned positive test grades.
Could someone seek to clarify the bold/italized part of the above quote in layman's terms? I've had extremely bad experiences with power supplies in the past, and I was hoping this power supply would be very stable as I plan to make another go at overclocking my system soon and I am a stability freak. I expect prime95 and 3dmark 2k1 loops to be able to run at least for 48 hours with no errors, as well as the same from memtest86.
Thanks again. Oh and first post!