Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (
More info?)
For the record here is that conversation:
----------------------------------------
See below
--
Paul Cyr
-----
The Debate Continues... www.xvsxp.com
Protect Yourself and Others...
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/
-----
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> wrote in message
news:ZwCNc.27$ja.17@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> PCyr wrote:
>> A FW is a f**kwit. It's a term the MPT uses often.
>>
>> If Zachary D. Wilson can not follow the rules by postdating and
>> spamming, then he should be banned.
>>
>> If MPT can not follow the rules by swearing and insulting other users
>> (deserving or innocent), then she should be banned.
>>
>> You don't actually thing that swearing at the guy is going to make
>> him stop? Do you? There is no justification for it, and it is rude
>> to the other users here that read MPT's profane posts.
>
> Paul I think I hear your mother calling you. Don't you have something to
> do,
> like tidying your bedroom, or washing the car? Or your homework.
>
Well your a poopie head! - You don't have anything better to say then
personal attacks? LOL! At least I'm able to attack your actions, instead
of arguing like a 5 year old and calling names that could apply to anyone.
You see, that's the difference between arguing well, and arguing like a 5
year old - when you argue well, you attack the facts at hand and point out
the flaws in the person's reasoning. When you argue like a 5 year old, you
say the same thing to everyone, regardless of what's being talked about, and
has no relevence to the arguement.
> If you're going to accuse someone of something, at least get your facts
> straight. I have never once used an obscenity anywhere in these groups.
Wow, for someone with an "English degree", you are sure having trouble
reading.
"...start with the moronic FW who deliberately..."
Now, let's take a look at the definition of obscenity:
(http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=obscenity)
4 entries found for obscenity.
ob·scen·i·ty ( P ) Pronunciation Key (b-sn-t, b-)
n. pl. ob·scen·i·ties
-The state or quality of being obscene.
-Indecency, lewdness, or offensiveness in behavior, expression, or
appearance.
-Something, such as a word, act, or expression, that is indecent or lewd.
-Something that is offensive or repulsive to the senses: "What had once been
a gentle hill covered with lush grass turned into a brown obscenity of bare
earth and smoke" (Tom Clancy).
Now, let's take a look at indecent, since this definition for obscenity is a
bit vauge (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=indecent):
2 entries found for indecent.
in·de·cent ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-dsnt)
adj.
-Offensive to good taste; unseemly.
-Offensive to public moral values; immodest. See Synonyms at improper.
Hmm... so calling someone a moronic f**kwit isn't offensive to good taste?
Maybe in the streets of downtown New York or something.
>
> Back in the bozo-bin with you.
>
How do I keep getting out? You've said this about 5 times now, but I
somehow escape! Care to clarify?
------------------------------------
No repsonse from MPT on this post, and here is another one from the same
thread:
------------------------------------
LOL! Oh, I'm going to enjoy tearing into these "facts"
--
Paul Cyr
-----
The Debate Continues... www.xvsxp.com
Protect Yourself and Others...
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/
-----
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> wrote in message
news
tCNc.26$ja.24@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> Nathan McNulty wrote:
>> First, what is a FW? Second, he has post dated 3 times and about
>> topics that don't have anything to do with this NG. He has spammed
>> this newsgroup about something he supposedly made (like anyone would
>> buy it anyways). He just needs to be banned if he can't follow the
>> guidelines.
>>
>> ----
>> Nathan McNulty
>>
>
> Ignore it, Nathan. Pot. Kettle. Paulie here has been banned from the
> groups
> at least once himself.
Really you ugly poopie head? I'm surprised I never realized that. Could
you tell me when that happened?
Oh, and yes, it is the pot calling the kettle black. Just do a search, and
you'll see users following me around, telling me to go to hell, and even
making entire threads complaining about me.
Oh wait, that never happened.
>I have had his Hotmail account terminated twice
Really? Which ones? I know there was the pcyr2000@hotmail.com, but what
was the other one?
> because he sent me a barrage of viruses and abusive emails.
Abusive, yes, containing viruses, no.
Oh, and it wasn't even a "barrage of ... abusive emails"
What was it, like 4, 5, or 6? (Rhetorical question BTW) On different days,
regarding different points.
>He is about 14
Stuck in a timewarp? When I started posting here I was 15, and that was
almost a year ago.
And what does age have to do with it? Does age somehow disqualify me from
making an arguement?
If I used you as an example, I'd say everyone over 40 or how ever old you
are can't make an arguement without slinging what's in their diapers at the
poster.
> and only posts here because he's procrastinating.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=procrastinating
So what am I putting off? I just got a new grade 11 chemistry credit at
summer school with an 89%. So what is it that I'm supposed to be doing, but
am not.
I see you got your crystal ball in the mail, and now know so much about me.
At least I don't call every other person a moronic f**kwit, who can spell,
while making my own share of spelling mistakes. So what is a brancell?
>
> Hotmail's T&C state that if you are banned from Hotmail you stay banned.
> They lie. Nevermind, he's back in the bozo-bin.
And yet I keep getting out! Something wrong with your mouse? Can't hit the
Block Senders List... selection without hitting Cancel?
And you really expect users to believe someone who's abusive to innocent
users, proven to lie and habitually acts like a hypocrite?
--
Paul Cyr
-----
The Debate Continues... www.xvsxp.com
Protect Yourself and Others in 6 Simple Steps...
http://davechalkconnected.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=1802
-----
"P.Cyr" <johndoe532004AThotmailDOTcom> wrote in message
news:%23CxUAI1gEHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> MPT is a big fat poopie head.
>
> In all honesty, I countered her points in another thread, but she seems
> content to keep posting the same information, which is fine, if she was
> correct in her arguments of my points. Oh wait! She never even tried to
> argue them.
>
> I also find it amusing how she posts personal information, but reports
> users to their ISP if they do the same.
>
> If she had a email conversation with my father, perhaps she would be so
> kind to let us know his email address. Perhaps my father is the milk-man?
>
> On that note, she says I don't do my homework, but hey, at least I know
> that it's against MS's terms of use to insult other users.
>
> abuse report sent to abuse@usenetserver.com
> abuse report sent to abuse@microsoft.com
>
> --
> Paul Cyr
>
> -----
>
> The Debate Continues... www.xvsxp.com
>
> Protect Yourself and Others in 6 Simple Steps...
>
http://davechalkconnected.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=1802
> -----
>
> "» mrtee «" <hingelicker at new.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:uZ55XixgEHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Gottcha/
>
> --
> Just my 2¢ worth,
> Jeff
> __________in response to__________
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> wrote in message
> news:_FQTc.32392$Dz3.23015@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> | Because Paulie is an idiot. He's 14, and responds to posts because he
> can't
> | be bothered to do his homework. I had a very interesting email exchange
> with
> | his father a while back. It seems that Paulie is banned from using the
> | computer, but he's obviously hacked it. Hopefully, it won't be long
> before
> | Daddy finds out (the trail of spyware and pornography should be a dead
> | giveaway).
> |
> | I had him banned from Hotmail some time ago, but it seems that Hotmail's
> | promise to ban an offender for life is a complete fabrication. Never
> mind,
> | the second he steps over the line again...
> |
> | --
> | My great-grandfather was born and raised in Elgin - did he eventually
> | lose his marbles?
> |
> |
> |
>
, so NTFSDOS shouldn't be necessary. Thanks.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram