boozer

Distinguished
Dec 14, 2005
15
0
18,510
Hello!

I'm trying to decide between an Opteron 165 or a 170. I understand the only difference is the multiplier. From what I've seen benchmark-wise, it appears that the 165's get very near the same speeds as a 170...
I'm kinda confused regarding the memory though. I understand that you can set memory frequency seperate from HTT frequency right? So if you have a 165 or a 170 that both OC to 2.6 Gig both running memory around DDR400 timings, there should be little to no difference between performance right? If I get a 165 up to 2.2 Ghz with mem running around DDR400 that should be roughly equivalent to an X2 4400 with mem running the same speed right?

The way I understand it, if I OC a 165 which has a 9x multiplier to a 244 HTT to get 2.2 GHz and run the memory at the same speed of 244, then this OC'ed 165 should actually outperform an X2 4400?

I feel like I'm missing something. Can someone tell me if I am?

Thanks!
 

the_guru

Distinguished
Dec 18, 2005
434
0
18,780
I'm kinda confused regarding the memory though. I understand that you can set memory frequency seperate from HTT frequency right?

Yes.

So if you have a 165 or a 170 that both OC to 2.6 Gig both running memory around DDR400 timings, there should be little to no difference between performance right?

Exactly.

If I get a 165 up to 2.2 Ghz with mem running around DDR400 that should be roughly equivalent to an X2 4400 with mem running the same speed right?

Exactamente.


The way I understand it, if I OC a 165 which has a 9x multiplier to a 244 HTT to get 2.2 GHz and run the memory at the same speed of 244, then this OC'ed 165 should actually outperform an X2 4400?


Yes, It would but to OC the memory to 244 requires some more expensive memory and I don't think the small gain in performance is worth the money. I would buy some cheaper CL2.5 memory like Corsair Value CL2.5 and OC the CPU async to the memory bus.