Hello!
I'm trying to decide between an Opteron 165 or a 170. I understand the only difference is the multiplier. From what I've seen benchmark-wise, it appears that the 165's get very near the same speeds as a 170...
I'm kinda confused regarding the memory though. I understand that you can set memory frequency seperate from HTT frequency right? So if you have a 165 or a 170 that both OC to 2.6 Gig both running memory around DDR400 timings, there should be little to no difference between performance right? If I get a 165 up to 2.2 Ghz with mem running around DDR400 that should be roughly equivalent to an X2 4400 with mem running the same speed right?
The way I understand it, if I OC a 165 which has a 9x multiplier to a 244 HTT to get 2.2 GHz and run the memory at the same speed of 244, then this OC'ed 165 should actually outperform an X2 4400?
I feel like I'm missing something. Can someone tell me if I am?
Thanks!
I'm trying to decide between an Opteron 165 or a 170. I understand the only difference is the multiplier. From what I've seen benchmark-wise, it appears that the 165's get very near the same speeds as a 170...
I'm kinda confused regarding the memory though. I understand that you can set memory frequency seperate from HTT frequency right? So if you have a 165 or a 170 that both OC to 2.6 Gig both running memory around DDR400 timings, there should be little to no difference between performance right? If I get a 165 up to 2.2 Ghz with mem running around DDR400 that should be roughly equivalent to an X2 4400 with mem running the same speed right?
The way I understand it, if I OC a 165 which has a 9x multiplier to a 244 HTT to get 2.2 GHz and run the memory at the same speed of 244, then this OC'ed 165 should actually outperform an X2 4400?
I feel like I'm missing something. Can someone tell me if I am?
Thanks!