To mix things up I been messing around with VISTA I like what I saw however all they have really done on the outside of the user interface is mess all the decision trees up as to where to find everything. This is now there and that is now here kinda deal.
The biggest beef I found was the Hardware support is now up to DX10 and I ran the pre evaluation tool on my system and it of course said my scanners and printers and external audio sound rack and joysticks will not be supported. I can’t get VISTA drivers for them either the company's wont support them.
Motherboard drivers and Graphics display adapter as well as CPU were supported. My system was just not all the other things Oh my HP camera was out as well.
I figure it would cost me around $1500.00 CAN to replace the hardware VISTA skipped out on me as not supported plus the loss of XP Pro, I purchased say another $200.00 bucks not to mention my USB Laser mouse I never got around to trying the full drivers for that another $200+ in cash. Software bundles invested because I like to own them over the last say since Win98SE another 2 grand. Around $3900.00 just off the top of my head at this point and none of that includes all of the prior hardware I have invested in heavily since Win98SE and even XP. $10 grand I am out easy in the last 5 years if I switch over fully to Vista and not the DVD bootable ISO Beta 5384 version Image I downloaded to try out but their full final version. (Purchased DVD burner to make ISO image DOH!) Waste of time as Vista was a bomb for older hardware support but a learning curve none the less.
I have enough spare parts to build 3 Win98 boxes and say three more XP systems moderately high end that will run high end software but not at full settings anymore. 10 grand to support one main game system out of the home over the last five years of OS and hardware support.
The beef I have right up front on Vista is that M$ left even more compatibility mode out of VISTA then they did for XP and when XP was released that was a Nightmare with faulty service pack 1 and all the vendors left scrambling to re-write software.
VISTA has broken away from third party builds unless you want to invest heavily yet again in hardware. Looks like this last build from M$ will force most people even some older core guys to purchase a retail box from one of the large core manufactures simply to bypass any compatibility issues.
I even managed to blue screen and memory dump VISTA trying to force the drivers in for my External Hercules Sound rack that basically supports all my USB devices as it’s got 4 ports. And the speakers sub and headset plugged into it. I was not disconnecting all the cables and resetting the system BIOS to turn on the onboard audio but I wanted to hear the sounds VISTA was proly squawking out so I tried to force the Herc driver in and blue screen mem dumped Vista so hard it was almost funny.
So no illusions about VISTA being a better game platform and that's why it's out here to replace game consoles and movie theatres. I managed to blue screen it 20 minutes after original install.
Oh I used Partition magic and made a nice 34 Gig partition onto my main C: drive so I could dual boot my XP Pro and VISTA so I would not lose my current working XP install and all the crap on the other HD I have games loaded into.
I formatted the new partition right at the desktop in XP and VISTA went right out the backdoor. However the DOS level DUAL boot option still exists and you need to select get this.....this is another new term from Microsoft...It does not say Boot to XP or XP Pro even it says boot to Microsoft or boot to an older version of Microsoft. Now we know where we stand in regards to M$. Yes we are $hit out of luck.
It's not been too smooth. (I'm on it now) Sidebar won't work, I downloaded the
64-bit version, but on Internet Explorer 32-bit works, if I try to use the
64-bit one, it locks up. Won't recognize my Audigy Z2, even with Creative's
Vista 64 drivers, so no sound. Granted it's beta, but runs noticably slower
then XP pro.
I do like like the look of it, so there's 1 in the plus column.
I downloaded the Vista Beta 2 (64-bit) and installed into into VMware on my Athlon X2 4200+ machine with a 74GB Raptor HDD and 2GB RAM. It runs very slowly. (XP runs well this way, FYI) It will often appear to lock up for a few seconds and then un-freeze. And the RAM usage is astronomical- 650 MB at goddamn IDLE?! I thought, "you HAVE to be kidding me"- but it is in fact the actual RAM usage for this OS!
So I certainly said blue as I ended up turning the air blue when demoing this OS. And I thought that XP was a pile- MSFT seems to have sunk to even newer lows, even for them...
I put VISTA into my X'2 IDE 80gig HD system, single AGP BFG 7800GT OC and ASUS motherboard NForce2 setup.
Drivers for the Motherboard from the Nvidia website loaded slowly like Vista had to crunch numbers on them for a bit. The pre-installer says the Nforce2 boards are supported but Nvidia or ASUS who make the board do not have a VISTA specific driver or 86X driver.
Ok so the Motherboard drivers load and now I am stuffing in the last version graphics driver off the Nvidia site the 91.31 version for Geforce type cards and VISTA again has to think this one over ? Strange the driver this time said it was 86X supportable for 32bit operating systems yet VISTA goes to a black screen with a flashing DOS _ top left corner and the drives blink and werrrrrr for a time then it pops back to the desktop and says yet again driver loaded successfully.
However as anyone will find out very shortly the BETA builds do not support Graphics driver control panel support and you do not have much of the way in set-up for the cards aside from Direct3D optimization and run the cards in high graphic output or best quality...... 7800GT from BFG was the last AGP version card put out and has an actual SLI GPU on it even if the BUSS is still AGP only.
Memory usage was higher then stock XP Pro 32bit around 600MB yes and that showed a task manager at 40+ processes and that was landing on the desktop for the first time and kicking the lunar dust around. Typical XP Pro desktop landins have less then 14 processes and show a memory usage at around 256MB or half a 512MB stick.
I will load the beta version onto my 64bit machine I am making an ISO version right now however from the few things I have read VISTA better supports the 32 bit version CPU's and not the 64bit ones. The 32Bit version ran jsut like OLD XP HOME or PRO did the first time slow not as slow surprisingly but almost. I don't think M$ wanted to reproduce the exact same failure with service pack on Vista so you can see and feel M$ is working hard to prevent that error again.
Imagine all the Notebook computers that really don't need external hardware to function that currently run XP Pro or MCE and the owners will try to load them up to Vista. Big suppliers of these notebooks better be making media kits that support the VISTA OS for the notebooks hardware.
However if you purchased a pre VISTA notebook system don't expect them to provide these media bundle support cd's to systems sold with warranty's prior to Vista.
In short don't purchase any new hardware until vista is being sold retail on hardware.
I find it odd that people still b!tch about the memory usage. Its still beta and turn off all the useless sh!t thats enabled by default. Unbelieveable.
Its interesting to see their discoveries and we all know its Beta software, but at least they're letting us know what they're running into, isn't that really what this place is all about sharing learned experiences with each other, especially the learned the hard way ones.
I would probably put it on my own machine but after 3 reinstalls of WinXP in a row caused by a crapped out ASUS M/B I really don't want to take the chance right now, I'm kinda tired of reinstalling my OP/SYS if you know what I mean.
So why don't you just let them share what they're learning with all of us and drop turning this into a jeering thread for once. OK Action!
I've already done so numerous times in other sections but I'll rehash some of it just for you.
On RAM usage, yes its quite high but if you disable all the useless bs and the services in line with an XP setup it'll go down to 400mb which isnt too unreasonable for a beta.
Things I've liked so far:
Linux like GUI's for installing.
Good support for USB sticks now, no more focking around with floppies.
64bit and 32bit both come on the same DVD.
Finally DVD only, CD's are slow and hopefully more games will go DVD.
Windows defender out of the box.
Windows update is no longer done though IE.
The networking centre was pretty cool.
The firewall is much better.
Media centre (although I didn't use it)
Good support for multiple sound cards, I can use my X-Fi for games and azalia for movies, etc.
The GUI is nice, even the basic one looks better then XP whilst running well even crappy graphics cards with default display drivers and integrated graphics with their proper drivers.
Priority for IO now not just CPU time.
Lots of little things I can't remember
Sucky things:
Superfetch is pointless chugs ram and does nothing useful.
Transparency is pointless, its just MS trying to be like Macs.
High memory usage, still beta and the XP-64 beta chugged heaps of memory as well (where was the outrage for that?)
Still somewhat slow.
All in all a nice evolutionary leap that fixes the problems in XP and various other things like DX.
Once the Beta testing is over do you think the present way it updates will be retained or with all windows activation crap will it go back to going through IE to validate legitimate copies?
You know MS is going to utilize some kind of activation and validation features was there any hint of whats to come there?
Because of some hardware failures the WinXP activation feature has really been a pain in the a$$ for me lately, thats why I'm presently gun shy of installing the Vista Beta and taking it for a test drive myself.
Having to call MS to get the machine activated is really a bothersome thing to have to do, and I don't see it getting any better.
Since Feb of this year I think I've reinstalled the same copy of XP 5 times resulting in 4 calls to MS to get the machine reactivated, they were nice enough at MS, but its still a time consuming thing to have to go through, and the MS updates will not install without the machine being activated.
Thats really one feature I wish wasn't part of Windows at all, its not a problem until hardware problems put you in the situation of having to go through it.
A M/B going bad is really hard to diagnose when it directly affects other components like the HDDs making it seem like the HDDs have failed, or the Memory and such as that, but once you finally figure out its the M/B it really is a relief to pin the problem down.
I know you're not interested in that so have a good one!
Ya, that is quite sh!tty. I got sick of having to call ms to get crap activated for friends so I grabbed a copy of the corporate version from work and used their CD key. Worked a treat.
Activation and all that other crap only annoys the legit people, it does nothing to stop pirates. They'd be better off leaving it out.
Anyone who has tried VISTA as a dual boot offering on C: Drive and wants to remove Vista by deleteing it off the Partition they created on C: Drive simply format that from the XP desktop (presumeing you are using XP home or Pro) partition and VISTA will be gone.
Now you will notice that when you reboot the DUAL BOOT window will still pop up and offer Microsoft as the primary OS (VISTA) of course it dosent say Vista... or An Older Version Of Windows.
This will get old fast as this dual boot menue will default to Microsoft looking for Vista and of course it will crash to a default screen saying that OS is of course unavailable because you deleted it.
So in short to remove the DUAL BOOT menue you will need to do 2 simple things anyone can manage.
First go to Windows Explorer and TOOLS/FOLDER OPTIONS and set Show Hidden files and folders. Also scroll down to Hide Protected Operating System Files (Recommended) and uncheck that box.
Now, find c:boot.ini
right click it, and remove its read-only property if it has one.
Now, open it in notepad (should just have to double click it.)
First two lines read like this:
[boot loader]
timeout=30
Change it to
[boot loader]
timeout=0
Now Open up your C: Drive folder and you will see a nice little folder called "Boot" this Boot folder belongs to VISTA and not XP you will send it to the recycle Bin but dont delete it just let it ride the out basket then reboot your XP install should come right back up to your password or desktop and never mention the dual boot menue again
When this fix is succesfull delete the Boot folder from your recycle bin.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.