Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > H264 playback (Mpeg4) on mobile processor

H264 playback (Mpeg4) on mobile processor

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - H264 playback (Mpeg4) on mobile processor

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I'm looking to upgrade to a new DVB-S S2 card but specs say that you need a P4 3.2Ghz to decode the stream without any problems.

This computer uses a mobile celeron 1300 and the system was able to receive
euro1080 (was still broadcating in mpeg2 at that time) but the computer shifted this down to a 800x600 resolution. Results was visible artifacts.

The videocard is a matrox G550 - 32MMB ram.
System has 512MB ram for windowsXP and the view application (TVCentral)

Pentium M's are faster compared to their celeron counterparts but is a Pentium M fast enough do the job. Or perhaps even more related to videocard? I don't have the oppertunity to experiment allot.

Cheers,

Sergey

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Most decoding drivers use the processor to decode H264 streams. So video card would have almost nothing to do with it. (Newer desktop videocards do have some sort of H264 acceleration... but it's not a show stopper). ATI has something out that increases encoding by up to 5x... but that's just encoding. Decoding is much simpler.

Anyways, Pentium M's/Centrino are significantly faster than Celeron M's and even Pentium 4 Mobile (at the same clock speed). The 2MB L2 cache is what owns.

I personally have a 1.6Ghz Pentium M (centrino really, but it's all the same) w/ 512MB of RAM. It decodes Apple's H.264 without a hitch. It also does high definition XVID without a hitch.

-mpjesse

Reply to mpjesse

Okay, thanks alot Mpjesse,


I'll move to a Pentium M755 (2 Ghz, 400Mhz FSB, 2048KB L2 cache)

Reply to Sergey
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > H264 playback (Mpeg4) on mobile processor
Go to:

There are 1297 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them