It was interesting to see that Obama had no response to any of the times Romney stated that Obama promised to lower the debt but only ended up increasing the national debt.
It was interesting to hear Romney state that Obama dumped $90Billion into green energy and then say that amount of money could have bolstered the domestic oil and coal production for the next 50 years; Obama could only look down at his shoes.
It was clear that Romney painted two very different paths for America, Obama for more Big Government spending, additional debt, the continued crushing of the middle class, and increased government oversight/regulation compared to Romney wanting to remove the Federal Government from the free markets and private enterprise and let the States to take the lead for health care, education, and Medicare/MediAid.
It became obvious that Obama has a tenuous grasp, at best, of economics and that he believes the proper place for government is to provide for the People rather than providing the framework that frees the People to achieve for themselves.
I think one of the most telling moments of Obama's belief that government provides better for the People than the private free market is when he cited removing the banks (the middle man) from providing student loans. You had to read between the lines to understand that what he really said was that Obama took the banks out of the equation and put in place a government agency to provide the very same student loans. Since when was the function of government to provide loans to private citizens, there are no enumerated powers in the Constitution that I have ever read that states that loans are within the purview of any branch of the government.
It wasn't the best debate I've ever watched but it certainly was the most telling of the contrasts between the two candidates.
I am looking forward to the next two debates.