Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web (
More info?)
Dmitri--
1) Search engines *can easily find whatever you are looking for*, but right
now they can't in *your hands*. You need to define what you need, and be
willing to put forth a little effort. 65% of the questions posed in these
newsgroups could be answered by use of search engines, and 45% could be
answered by the MSKB, Technet's pages or XP Help and Support three of the
most under used resources on the planet. When you add MVP web pages and
other XP web pages, that number goes way up.
Most questions I see from friends and acquaintances they could easily answer
if they used their keyboard and mouse and the web, but what they are wanting
is a type of "curiour errand runing service" from the web to their door.
2) Analog X *does have a number of utilities that will do what you want*,
but you need to actually look at them in their network section and get *the
help you need* at your workplace to determine what you want. Analog X is
not an application--it's a site with about 100 applications and some of them
are awfully helpful, particularly since the cost to you is zip. Many people
do not take the time to appreciate what they do and don't get the benefit.
3) If you IT director doesn't know how to sit down with you and show you
where to get whatever it is you actually want and need, or doesn't know
anything about packet sniffers, then you need to search for someone
competent who does.
4) There are a plethora of people in the broadband forums I linked you to
who are more than competent to help you find whatever it is you need and
want. There are a plethora of people here, but you have to be specific.
5) Tools you are blowing off as no good are more than adequate to do what
you are looking for and the search engines are way more than adequate to
find them in the right hands.
6) Whatever is your quest or problem, your IT guy was blowing you off and
failed miserably in not assisting you. He has the advantage that he can put
his butt in a chair right next to you on your box.
Best,
Chad Harris
__________________________________
"Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message
news:uy0AZXCjEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
Our IT does not know how to put a packet sniffer on my case and track my
usage. He will not help me with this.
Yes. I have run SpyBot Search & Destroy. It did not find anything
considerable.
"Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
news:evglmGCjEHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Have your run SpyBot Search & Destroy
> www.safer-networking.org to find spyware and also a current
> a/v program?
>
> Your IT guy can put a packet sniffer on your case and track
> your usage.
>
>
> "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message
> news:%23HBM%23c$iEHA.1644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> | Our LAN administrator says that my internet traffic is too
> big. I want to
> | know what makes the traffic so big.
> | The search Engines are good when you search for a phrase
> or rare word or
> | symbol combination. Searching for "internet traffic
> monitor" or something
> | like this does not give anything good.
> | "Chad Harris" <ddram32_nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> | news:e$cVcW4iEHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> | > Dimitri--
> | >
> | > Um what happens when you dust off 'ole google or 'ole
> msn or 'ole yahoo
> | > search?
> | >
> | > "Neecheevoo?" "Holodna?" "Gdeh Search Engine?"
> | >
> | > I'd be willing to bet if you try
> | >
http://www.broadbandreports.com/forums/all or a search
> engine like google,
> | > yahoo, or msn or dozens of others, since you know
> exactly what you're
> | > looking for, you'll have some luck. From your skeletal
> outline, I thought
> | > those sites might have something for you.
> | >
> | > Try http://www.minasi.com/ or Steve Gibson's site
> www.grc.com as well.
> | >
> | > Best,
> | >
> | > Chad Harris
> | > _____________________________________
> | >
> | >
> | > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in
> message
> | > news:OteLie2iEHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> | > I can't find anything appropriate at
> | >
http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/network.htm
> | >
> | > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in
> message
> | > news:%23axKR%23ziEHA.2524@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> | >>I need the internet traffic to and from my computer
> only, not the
> | >>aggregate traffic to and from all LAN computers.
> | >> "Hans-Georg Michna"
> <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> wrote in message
> | >> news:fre9i0hlsv1qp0csh2r50qf5u4bfdr478o@4ax.com...
> | >>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:58:14 +0400, "Dmitriy
> Kopnichev"
> | >>> <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote:
> | >>>
> | >>>>Does multiplying packet numbers by 1,000 convert into
> bytes or
> | >>>>kilobytes?
> | >>>
> | >>> Dmitriy,
> | >>>
> | >>> bytes. The maximum length of an Ethernet packet is
> 1,500 bytes,
> | >>> including a little overhead. Some packets are shorter
> though, so
> | >>> please understand that the multiply-by-1,000 trick is
> very
> | >>> inaccurate, but it gives you a hint.
> | >>>
> | >>> Separating Internet traffic from LAN traffic is not
> possible
> | >>> with these simple tools. You may need a good network
> sniffer
> | >>> with a filter, but I don't know much about these.
> | >>>
> | >>> Another way to go is to let the router do the
> measuring. This
> | >>> depends, of course, on whether you have a router at
> all and
> | >>> whether the router provides this service. Mine does,
> but only
> | >>> for the aggregate traffic to and from all LAN
> computers.
> | >>>
> | >>> Hans-Georg
> | >>>
> | >>> --
> | >>> No mail, please.
> | >>
> | >>
> | >
> |
> |
>
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram