Gents.
I am currently quite fed up with the twice dead and revived Athlon XP 2600+ machine. Nothing bad about AMD, but ever since my first Slot A Athlon I had nothing but problems.
This is neither a bitching or trolling post, or an "AMD V Intel" post.
I find it slightly hard to pick components based on reviews and so have to ask for the opinions.
The existing machine is comprised of following items:
Asrock K7VT6 (died last week, waiting to replace)
AMD Athlon 2600+ 400Mhz FSB CPU (running at 333Mhz FSB) - not running at all atm chilled by Arctic Cooler.
1024Mb RAM in 2 PC3200 DIMMS at 400Mhz
ATI Radeon 9200 All-In-Wonder
1Tb HD space in 5 WD HD (2x200Gb, 3x250Gb) 3 of them using PCI controller (no raid)
All on a 300W PSU in a neatly ventilated I-TEE case.
I aim to replace the mobo on this one and hand down to my wife for the purpouses of Sims2 and occasional network shoot'em-up slaughter to clear up family issues.
Now, the machine I am looking for is not aimed for gaming, although I do enjoy UT2004/CS/COD etc. and would like those to run fairly speedily.
My main priorities are 2D photo processing in Photoshop, 3D Gfx (using Lighwave and Maya), video processing/encoding, running testlab on VirtualPC and music production - to name a few daily tasks.
All the disks except system 200Gb will be moved to the new machine and although I would appreciate fast x-fers I am reluctant to go with SATA.
Disk usage is probably 90% storage 10% transfer/access.
Occasionally I tend to leave the machine on for a while - up to 2-3 weeks with a restart in between. Due to that I don't tend to poke around overclocking things, and it remains a kind of "would-be-nice-to-try-but-not-necessary" thing.
Additionally, I just replaced the batteries in my Smart UPS 700 and will be using it with the new box - last time a power spike killed the mobo and 700Gb of disks in one go.
So far I have received few suggestions as for instance:
"If you go for Intel CPU, stick to Intel's native chipset", or "Athlon 64 system will ofer more bang for the money".
But it is always interesting to hear other opinions.
So any comment is welcome.
I am currently quite fed up with the twice dead and revived Athlon XP 2600+ machine. Nothing bad about AMD, but ever since my first Slot A Athlon I had nothing but problems.
This is neither a bitching or trolling post, or an "AMD V Intel" post.
I find it slightly hard to pick components based on reviews and so have to ask for the opinions.
The existing machine is comprised of following items:
Asrock K7VT6 (died last week, waiting to replace)
AMD Athlon 2600+ 400Mhz FSB CPU (running at 333Mhz FSB) - not running at all atm chilled by Arctic Cooler.
1024Mb RAM in 2 PC3200 DIMMS at 400Mhz
ATI Radeon 9200 All-In-Wonder
1Tb HD space in 5 WD HD (2x200Gb, 3x250Gb) 3 of them using PCI controller (no raid)
All on a 300W PSU in a neatly ventilated I-TEE case.
I aim to replace the mobo on this one and hand down to my wife for the purpouses of Sims2 and occasional network shoot'em-up slaughter to clear up family issues.
Now, the machine I am looking for is not aimed for gaming, although I do enjoy UT2004/CS/COD etc. and would like those to run fairly speedily.
My main priorities are 2D photo processing in Photoshop, 3D Gfx (using Lighwave and Maya), video processing/encoding, running testlab on VirtualPC and music production - to name a few daily tasks.
All the disks except system 200Gb will be moved to the new machine and although I would appreciate fast x-fers I am reluctant to go with SATA.
Disk usage is probably 90% storage 10% transfer/access.
Occasionally I tend to leave the machine on for a while - up to 2-3 weeks with a restart in between. Due to that I don't tend to poke around overclocking things, and it remains a kind of "would-be-nice-to-try-but-not-necessary" thing.
Additionally, I just replaced the batteries in my Smart UPS 700 and will be using it with the new box - last time a power spike killed the mobo and 700Gb of disks in one go.
So far I have received few suggestions as for instance:
"If you go for Intel CPU, stick to Intel's native chipset", or "Athlon 64 system will ofer more bang for the money".
But it is always interesting to hear other opinions.
So any comment is welcome.