Archived from groups: comp.dcom.vpn (
More info?)
"Patrick Warner" <warner_patrick@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8e06f44d.0404220412.5ec7e766@posting.google.com...
> Thanks for taking the time to reply to my message.
>
> "shope" <stephen_hope@xntlxworld.com> wrote in message
news:<1Vyhc.87$B21.18@newsfe1-win>...
> >
> > this does happen frequently - 1st point of call should be your company
> > support, since some or all of the stuff needed to get around this may
> > involve them in making some changes.
>
> I am already talking to the support guys at my company they are
> looking into it but don't know how to solve yet.
>
> >
> > there are lots of different ways to implement a VPN, and it isnt obvious
> > which you are using. it sounds like you have a VPN client using UDP or
raw
> > IPsec to talk to the VPN server at the office.
> >
> > what can happen is that the VPN client and / or the router support the
VPN
> > link, but either the protocol used or the central VPN server doesnt
> > understand how to "untangle" 2 connections at the same remote IP
address.
> >
> > if you can, try configuring the clients for TCP encapsulation of IPsec,
or
> > setting the 2 clients to use different VPN methods - what is feasible
will
> > depend on the vpn hardware, software and config in place.
> > >
>
> We are using Nortel Networks Contivity VPN Client. Looking in the
> options for the client I don't see anything about switching on TCP
> encapsulation. Is this something that would have to be done at the
> server side?
if the client cant do it then you may be stuck - there are lots of different
clients, and lots of different ways to support NAT - some may limit you to 1
client per remote site router.
you could always get your support team to ask Nortel, or wherever you bought
this stuff.
>
>
> > > According to the specs, my Gateway has "VPN Traversal (Pass-through
> > > IPSec, PPTP, L2TP)" but frankly I have no clue whether I have set this
> > > up properly.
> >
> > not sure what this means - most recent VPN clients work without any help
> > from the router - so long as they are configured in the right way.
>
> OK - so what you are saying is that the whether this works or not
> should be independent of my router/gateway hardware? I hope that's
> true, but how does that relate to other messages I have seen which
> state that certain routers "only support one VPN tunnel at a time".
this is about ipsec and UDP encapsulation - tcp encap stuff on the clients i
have used (cisco) doesnt have a problem with multiple clients via the same
router, but the VPN server in the centre may not like 2 devices from the
same source IP address (your router WAN port).
>
> cheers
> p
--
Regards
Stephen Hope - return address needs fewer xxs