iNFRArED reach?

Forum Smartphones & PDAs : Windows Mobile - iNFRArED reach?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

i got 4150 and pocket remote controler (and sony tv), and it works only in
1m range? i expected
more, any ideas? is that all from IR, 1m?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

varies by device, but the "standard" is officially 3 inches.

a few devices specifications list the ir output as "consumer grade"
which is the indication that ppc universal remote ir programs can be
used in place of tv controllers.

got a videocam? either computer or camcorder in a dark room and you can
"view" the ir output... very educational to compare it to any generic ir
remote control.

Beverly Howard [MS MVP-Mobile Devices]

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

"Beverly Howard [Ms-MVP/MobileDev]" <BevNoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote in
message news:udA0Gd0lEHA.2892@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> varies by device, but the "standard" is officially 3 inches.

> got a videocam? either computer or camcorder in a dark room and you can
> "view" the ir output... very educational to compare it to any generic ir
> remote control.

Zat so? You can see IR?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

"Sanders Kaufman" <sanderskaufman@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"Beverly Howard [Ms-MVP/MobileDev]" <BevNoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote in
>message news:udA0Gd0lEHA.2892@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> varies by device, but the "standard" is officially 3 inches.
>
>> got a videocam? either computer or camcorder in a dark room and you can
>> "view" the ir output... very educational to compare it to any generic ir
>> remote control.
>
>Zat so? You can see IR?

No, but the CCD in the camera can.

However, it may not be very useful for evaluating the output of a remote. It
will tend to show IrDA as being much brighter than CIR as the former is
closer to wavelengths that are visible by humans. The video camera will be
optimized for the visible spectrum. IrDA uses 850nm IR while CIR uses 940nm.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

imho, viewing ir output has been very useful both for getting an
indication of the "brightness" and to be able to "see" the beam
orientation... point the device at a white wall or other white surface.

With all of the ppc ir output that I have put to this test, where a
standard remote control looks like a very bright flashlight, the ppc's
output is similar to viewing a ship's signal light many miles distant.

Beverly Howard [MS MVP-Mobile Devices]

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

CCD? CIR? I have a QuickCam Express and a ViewSonic V37 with a camera - do
those guys have CCD?

Are CIR and IrDA different, the same, got nothing to do with each other? I
thought ALL InfraRed devices were "IrDA" - PC ports, remote controls, fiber
optic... whatever.

I checked out a coupla little IrDA thingys to see what was programmatically
available. I've *seen* a lot of serial port programming (back in the
YModem/MNP5 days) and IrDA stuff looks interesting.

Any suggestions for programming resources for IrDA on the Pocket PC?
(Mobile 2003)


"Dave Houston" <nobody@whocares.com> wrote in message
news:4141d4a8.182659863@nntp.fuse.net...
> "Sanders Kaufman" <sanderskaufman@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"Beverly Howard [Ms-MVP/MobileDev]" <BevNoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote in
>>message news:udA0Gd0lEHA.2892@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> varies by device, but the "standard" is officially 3 inches.
>>
>>> got a videocam? either computer or camcorder in a dark room and you can
>>> "view" the ir output... very educational to compare it to any generic ir
>>> remote control.
>>
>>Zat so? You can see IR?
>
> No, but the CCD in the camera can.
>
> However, it may not be very useful for evaluating the output of a remote.
> It
> will tend to show IrDA as being much brighter than CIR as the former is
> closer to wavelengths that are visible by humans. The video camera will be
> optimized for the visible spectrum. IrDA uses 850nm IR while CIR uses
> 940nm.
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

 

IrDA is unmodulated 850nm IR. It was designed to be very short range (1m).

CIR (Consumer IR) is almost always modulated (usually around 38kHz) 940nm
IR. It is fairly easy to get very long range as long as transmitter &
receiver are designed for the same modulation (i.e. carrier) frequency and
both are optimized for the same wavelength IR. I've gotten +30m with 3V and
a single IR emitter.

There are some remotes (mostly European) that use unmodulated IR.

CCD: Charge Coupled Device (it's the sensing element in most video cameras).

"Sanders Kaufman" <sanderskaufman@hotmail.com> wrote:

>CCD? CIR? I have a QuickCam Express and a ViewSonic V37 with a camera - do
>those guys have CCD?
>
>Are CIR and IrDA different, the same, got nothing to do with each other? I
>thought ALL InfraRed devices were "IrDA" - PC ports, remote controls, fiber
>optic... whatever.
>
>I checked out a coupla little IrDA thingys to see what was programmatically
>available. I've *seen* a lot of serial port programming (back in the
>YModem/MNP5 days) and IrDA stuff looks interesting.
>
>Any suggestions for programming resources for IrDA on the Pocket PC?
>(Mobile 2003)
>
>
>"Dave Houston" <nobody@whocares.com> wrote in message
>news:4141d4a8.182659863@nntp.fuse.net...
>> "Sanders Kaufman" <sanderskaufman@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Beverly Howard [Ms-MVP/MobileDev]" <BevNoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote in
>>>message news:udA0Gd0lEHA.2892@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>> varies by device, but the "standard" is officially 3 inches.
>>>
>>>> got a videocam? either computer or camcorder in a dark room and you can
>>>> "view" the ir output... very educational to compare it to any generic ir
>>>> remote control.
>>>
>>>Zat so? You can see IR?
>>
>> No, but the CCD in the camera can.
>>
>> However, it may not be very useful for evaluating the output of a remote.
>> It
>> will tend to show IrDA as being much brighter than CIR as the former is
>> closer to wavelengths that are visible by humans. The video camera will be
>> optimized for the visible spectrum. IrDA uses 850nm IR while CIR uses
>> 940nm.
>>
>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Smartphones & PDAs > Windows Mobile > iNFRArED reach?
Go to:

There are 1226 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them