Well, it looks like those rumours of a Celeron level dual core may be finally coming true. Intel appears to be getting ready to release a 2.66GHz core core with 2x1MB of L2 cache on a 533MHz FSB. It'll be called the Pentium D 805 and will be available for as low as $163.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060123051023.html
It's hard to tell whether this is a good thing or a bad thing. The performance will no doubt be decidedly unimpressive due partially to the low clock speed, but especially to the bottlenecked FSB. Intel really aught to transition the new 65nm Celeron D's to a 667MHz FSB. At least the L2 cache hasn't been cut down. It'd be interesting to see how it performs against the Celeron D 355, the new 65nm Celeron Ds, and the 521 though.
Heat and power consumption will be less of an issue due to the lower clock speed and FSB. It would be even lower if Intel cared to enabled EIST, since with a minimum multiplier of 14 with a 133MHz bus it would downclock nicely to 1862MHz.
It's probably just a stunt to clear out the last of the 8xx inventory including 820D rejects, but if mass volumes encourages developers to multithread I really can't complain. I wouldn't buy one myself of course.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060123051023.html
It's hard to tell whether this is a good thing or a bad thing. The performance will no doubt be decidedly unimpressive due partially to the low clock speed, but especially to the bottlenecked FSB. Intel really aught to transition the new 65nm Celeron D's to a 667MHz FSB. At least the L2 cache hasn't been cut down. It'd be interesting to see how it performs against the Celeron D 355, the new 65nm Celeron Ds, and the 521 though.
Heat and power consumption will be less of an issue due to the lower clock speed and FSB. It would be even lower if Intel cared to enabled EIST, since with a minimum multiplier of 14 with a 133MHz bus it would downclock nicely to 1862MHz.
It's probably just a stunt to clear out the last of the 8xx inventory including 820D rejects, but if mass volumes encourages developers to multithread I really can't complain. I wouldn't buy one myself of course.