Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
<127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:2vukq1F2p6c9eU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Can any one recommend me a colour laser printer ?
>
> My usage is not very high so it need not be fast - I prefer quality over
> quantity.
>
> I also prefer to have a network port on it so I can hook an Ethernet
> bridge
> on
> to make it wireless and leave it in a cupboard out of the way.
>
> I have had limited printouts to look at and this is what I think:
>
> Personally I thought the colour print out from the Xerox Phaser 6100 was
> the best but its cost of inks were also the most expensive.
>
> The Oki C3100 was the 2nd best for colour but the text and pictures were a
> little blocky but its toners were the cheapest.
>
> The Samsung CLP-500N was nothing special. But there wasnt enougth colour
> printouts to make a good judgement.
>
> The Lexmark C510 was OK but it was hard to judge it without enougth
> printouts.
>
> Any comments from owners ?
And also Minolta MagiColor 2300W. It doesn't have Ethernet port but you can
easily add a wireless g print server, wired version is even cheaper. Have
you seen the output of the C3100? I have the C5100, I don't see anything
blocky, unless 3100 is substantially different.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
> >
> > Personally I thought the colour print out from the Xerox Phaser 6100 was
> > the best but its cost of inks were also the most expensive.
> >
> > The Oki C3100 was the 2nd best for colour but the text and pictures were
a
> > little blocky but its toners were the cheapest.
> >
> > The Samsung CLP-500N was nothing special. But there wasnt enougth colour
> > printouts to make a good judgement.
> >
> > The Lexmark C510 was OK but it was hard to judge it without enougth
> > printouts.
> >
> > Any comments from owners ?
>
>
> And also Minolta MagiColor 2300W. It doesn't have Ethernet port but you
can
> easily add a wireless g print server, wired version is even cheaper. Have
> you seen the output of the C3100? I have the C5100, I don't see anything
> blocky, unless 3100 is substantially different.
>
I have some printouts coming from Minolta.
Yes I have seen the C3100 I would say it was a good printer but it wasnt as
good
as the Xerox Phaser 6100's colour prints, thats all.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
<127.0.0.1@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:301pakF27h1biU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
>> >
>> > Personally I thought the colour print out from the Xerox Phaser 6100
>> > was
>> > the best but its cost of inks were also the most expensive.
>> >
>> > The Oki C3100 was the 2nd best for colour but the text and pictures
>> > were
> a
>> > little blocky but its toners were the cheapest.
>> >
>> > The Samsung CLP-500N was nothing special. But there wasnt enougth
>> > colour
>> > printouts to make a good judgement.
>> >
>> > The Lexmark C510 was OK but it was hard to judge it without enougth
>> > printouts.
>> >
>> > Any comments from owners ?
>>
>>
>> And also Minolta MagiColor 2300W. It doesn't have Ethernet port but you
> can
>> easily add a wireless g print server, wired version is even cheaper. Have
>> you seen the output of the C3100? I have the C5100, I don't see anything
>> blocky, unless 3100 is substantially different.
>>
>
> I have some printouts coming from Minolta.
>
> Yes I have seen the C3100 I would say it was a good printer but it wasnt
> as
> good
> as the Xerox Phaser 6100's colour prints, thats all.
The design of Xerox Phaser 6100 looks just the same as Samsung CLP-500N so
the print quality should be similar.
Okidata is fast because it's single pass. I have both Minolta 2300W and
Okidata 5100n, along with Epson R200. ;-)
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
>
>
> The design of Xerox Phaser 6100 looks just the same as Samsung CLP-500N so
> the print quality should be similar.
>
> Okidata is fast because it's single pass. I have both Minolta 2300W and
> Okidata 5100n, along with Epson R200. ;-)
>
>
So, out of those printers which do you prefer (for quality) ?
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.