X1900 tomshardware benchmarks

[Heyyou27]

I don't know, but something smells a bit fishy...
When using the F.E.A.R. in game benchmark at 1280x960 with 4XMSAA and 16XAF with Soft shadows enabled I scored an average of 42 frames per second. The lowest the framerate dropped was 24 fps.

 

[cleeve]

What cpu did they use in Tom's test?

If it's different from your own it may have quite an impact.

 

[lakedude]

Yes there must be a mistake. Look at the 1900xt, it seems to be the very best of all the cards at 16x12 (green line):

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/01/24/ati_radeon_x1900_heats_up_with_48_pixel_pipelines/page15.html

 

[viperxoc]

What I don't understand is why they used the ASUS SLI Premium (8X and 8X when in SLI). They should have used the ASUS SLI Delux (16X and 16X when in SLI). I know tests have been done and there is not that much difference as of yet, but they are not using the best SLI setup on the market. This is like comparing a 2.4 GHZ Pentium to a 2.2 GHZ Athalon. Of course the Pentium is going to win.

Viper

 

[illicitsc]

This is like comparing a 2.4 GHZ Pentium to a 2.2 GHZ Athalon. Of course the Pentium is going to win.

Viper

WHAT WHAT?????!!!! thats like P4c northwood 2.4ghz vs athlon 64 3500+....

 

[lakedude]

This is like comparing a 2.4 GHZ Pentium to a 2.2 GHZ Athalon. Of course the Pentium is going to win.

Viper

What What What! A 2.2GHz Athalon would destroy a 2.4GHz P4.

 

[viperxoc]

The example I used was not the best choice. A better example would be an AGP 8X GeForce 6800 VS a 16X PCIE ATI Raedon x800. An 8X AGP should never be compared to a 16X PCIE because they are not the best.

Viper