Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » General Homebuilt » Haven't built a computer in a long time... building a server
 

Haven't built a computer in a long time... building a server




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Haven't built a computer in a long time... building a server
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I'm thinking about this setup, but I've not settled on any details:

Dual Core Opteron 165 (Denmark)
2 gigs DDR
2 200 gb HDDs in RAID0 (it'll be as much a file server as it will be dependent on database queries, so SCSI offers no advantages here)

Questions:

Which motherboards support Opterons? any of the socket 939s?

I'm going to be using RAID, and like I said, I've not tinkered with computers in a long time... how is RAID done nowadays? Is it integrated on the motherboard or is it done as an attachment? Will Windows Server 2003 ask me if I want to set RAID up or is it something I have to do prior to installing the OS?

Also SATA is better than Ultra ATA, right?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

NOTE: Replies such as "It would be better if you had 10 HDDs in RAID1+0 and 32 gigs of RAM!" are not appreciated. :roll: This server is already going to exceed my needs; I'm just looking to get the best bang for my buck off of these or similar specs.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

"Which motherboards support Opterons? any of the socket 939s?
"

There are indeed Opterons for socket 939 and socket 940, so be sure you get the correct MB....

Any of the NF4 socket 939's should fill the bill nicely, and the Asus top of the line board(s) do also support Raid 0/1/5/JBOD via it's integrated SATA Raid controller....

If you're going to install the OS on a (integrated ) hardware RAID 0, the BIOS will need some RAID configuring before hand, and the OS will rather quickly require drivers for the integrated RAID controller.

(many advise against the OS being on a RAID 0 due to it's lack of fault tolerance, where at least RAID 5 allows a disc failure without being up the proverbial creek; a glitch with RAID 0, and you are needing a paddle)

As for SATA vs Ulra ATA (IDE aka PATA), the SATA drives are becoming more dominate, and now most MBs might only come with one or two IDE ports, vice the 4 or even 6 IDE ports that was not uncommon a few years back...

The SATA interface is quicker, up to 3 GB/sec with SATA2 specs, but most individual 7200 rpm drives are limited in throughput to ~60 MB per sec anyway, although that can certainly be improved upon with two or more drives in RAID 0 or RAID 5...

You can get better RAID 0 help/advice in the disc drive support area, as many use them, and are better familiar with the OS/hardware quirks on an initial install.....


Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » General Homebuilt » Haven't built a computer in a long time... building a server

Google Ads
Ad
News

ECS enters server board market, to partner with Lenovo

Published on July 14, 2005

Elitegroup Computer Systems (ECS) announced yesterday that it has partnered with Lenovo in the server market. Read more

Asustek debuts dual-core Intel Xeon server boards

Published on October 12, 2005

Asustek Computer yesterday unveiled its PVL-D series server motherboards, coinciding with Intel's recent launch of its dual-core Xeon CPU that will improve the performance and response time of multi-threaded server applications. Read more

Apple's in the eye of flaw finders

Published on February 17, 2006

At the recent ShmooCon hacking conference, one security researcher found out the hard way that such venues can be hostile, when an unknown hacker took control of the researcher's computer, disabling the firewall and starting up a file server. Read more

Asustek Launches Compact Server Based On Intel 45 Nm Technology

Published on March 24, 2008

Asustek Computer recently launched its latest 1U server, the RS100-E5/PI2, a quad-core/dual-core Intel Xeon 3000 series platform, which supports Intel 45 nm processors with a FSB up to 1333 MHz. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more