Don't be fooled by their specs(SATA=150 MB/s & SATA II=300 MB/s).These are the bus speed not the real speed.Even a 15000 RPM SCSI HDD can't send/recieve data at 300 MB/s!!
Stick with a SATA HDD (7200 RPM) or a 10000 Raptor from Western Digital( if its price is affordable).
The only way you'd even come close to maxing out the SATA 1 spec is to have 3 HDD's in a RAID 0 mode. One HDD averages 60MB/s (unless its a raptor) and the SATA 1 spec is 150MB/s.
If you're looking at pure bandwidth there is no difference between SATA 1 and SATA II for typical users. Look at the other features to figure out which one to buy.
The SATA spec relates to the bandwidth that each SATA controller can handle, not the drive's bandwidth. The HDD is just saying is SATA II compatible. SATA II is backwards compatible with SATA 1.
So my two drives in RAID zero don't neccessarily need to be 3G drives, or take advatage of the 3G controller?
A normal SATA drive, and sata controller would perform just as fast?
Yup, but newer drive has improved mechanics and electronics that make them faster than older one. And since newer are generally SATA 3G anyway, they will be faster, but only because of the drive itself, not the interface.
So, a nice SATAII HDD may work better than a SATA HDD, even if running in SATA1 condition because of improvement over the last generation..
So my two drives in RAID zero don't neccessarily need to be 3G drives, or take advatage of the 3G controller?
A normal SATA drive, and sata controller would perform just as fast?
Yup, but newer drive has improved mechanics and electronics that make them faster than older one. And since newer are generally SATA 3G anyway, they will be faster, but only because of the drive itself, not the interface.
So, a nice SATAII HDD may work better than a SATA HDD, even if running in SATA1 condition because of improvement over the last generation..
What Pat said.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.