3dmark 06 scores
Tags:
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
hey, jw wondering how i put up against everyone in 3dmark 06, i got 4208 wit:
p4 3.2 oc=3.4
2048 ram 5-5-5-15-20
BFG 7800 GTX ooced to 485 core 1.35 on mem
any scores would be apperciated
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95579 <-ORB proving it
p4 3.2 oc=3.4
2048 ram 5-5-5-15-20
BFG 7800 GTX ooced to 485 core 1.35 on mem
any scores would be apperciated
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95579 <-ORB proving it
More about : 3dmark scores
Wow almost as much as my negative result. :tongue:
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/518/3dmarkoh64hd.jpg
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/518/3dmarkoh64hd.jpg
Related ressources
- 3Dmark 06 , vantage,and 11 scores - Forum
- 8800gt Scores low on 3DMARK 06 test - Forum
- PCMark 05, 3DMark 05 + 06 Scores ok for my setup? - Forum
- got my new system, HORRIBLE 3Dmark 06 scores ! - Forum
- 3DMark 06 scores .... - Forum
Quote:
hey, jw wondering how i put up against everyone in 3dmark 06, i got 4208 wit:p4 3.2 oc=3.4
2048 ram 5-5-5-15-20
BFG 7800 GTX ooced to 485 core 1.35 on mem
any scores would be apperciated
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95579 <-ORB proving it
lol thats a crazy score!!! 8O
I cudent evern get past the system checks lol
Quote:
hey, jw wondering how i put up against everyone in 3dmark 06, i got 4208 wit:p4 3.2 oc=3.4
2048 ram 5-5-5-15-20
BFG 7800 GTX ooced to 485 core 1.35 on mem
any scores would be apperciated
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=95579 <-ORB proving it
Not sure about your 3dmark06 score, but the 3dmark05 score listed in your sig (7300+) is way too low I think. You have clocked your 7800GTX to nearly the same as my Asus 7800GTX Top (486/1350 Factory OC) and yet your score is way lower then what i get with Athlon64 3700+ (Stock)... i.e., 8550 (with anti-virus etc working in the background). Your 3.4 P4 cant be making that much of a difference as 3dmark05 is much more GPU reliant and doesnt include CPU scores in the 3dmark score. My detailed specs are in my sig.
as i siad before my GT kills your gtx.
1.There must be extra programs running in the background turn them off.
like antivirsus friewall etc.
2.Also go into your driver setup and turnoff AA & AS, also set the slider to performance not quality.
3.Disable some of the startup programs, goto to major geeks to download that software, or ask someone to help you do this.
4.Double check motherboard drivers and graphics card drivers are the latest.
By following the above tips should increase you score. GOODLUCK.
1.There must be extra programs running in the background turn them off.
like antivirsus friewall etc.
2.Also go into your driver setup and turnoff AA & AS, also set the slider to performance not quality.
3.Disable some of the startup programs, goto to major geeks to download that software, or ask someone to help you do this.
4.Double check motherboard drivers and graphics card drivers are the latest.
By following the above tips should increase you score. GOODLUCK.
you double checked your motherboard drivers yes and you switched AA and AS off in the grphics properties yes?
If so even im stumped.
But theres one more thing which certainly boosts scores on any PC do a fresh operating system instal, reformat the hard drive and this should boost the scores it did for me.
If so even im stumped.
But theres one more thing which certainly boosts scores on any PC do a fresh operating system instal, reformat the hard drive and this should boost the scores it did for me.
3dmark06 Score : 6775
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=92632
3dmark05 score : 11684
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1767277
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=92632
3dmark05 score : 11684
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1767277
Quote:
checked mobo drivers, and no way im redoing my os, did it once took me a week to get it right, got x64 pro so it takes me for ever cuz u have to get lucky when u instal it, so i guess im just stuck wit a low scoreYou have WindowsXPx64?? Why didnt you say so before. That is probably whats giving you a poor score in 3dMark05. I hear 3dmark05 is not meant for XPx64 and most people cant even finish the whole benchmark on the 64bit wondows.
Anyhow, sorry to contradict RX8, but i wont take his advice and disable my anti-virus and bump down the quality settings to performance. Thats not how I got my 3dmark05. Its taken with Norton Internet Security 2005 running in the background and other standard stuff, with driver settings on default and on Quality. I am presently using 82.12, but my score was on the 81.95 I think. My point is, that the relevent score in these benchmarks is the one which is obtained under normal using conditions, i.e., conditions which are prevalent when you play your games or run other graphical applications. I dont disable my Security and Anti-Virus to play games, no thank you sir.
BTW, I think I get a similar 3dMark06 Score (around 4200 or so) as yours so thats why i am curious as to your low 3dmark05 score. but no worries, its most probably the incompatability between XP64 and 3dmark05.
Quote:
I have 6745 on mine. GA-8N SLI Royal mobo
Pentium D 840 oc 3.517 Ghz
4x512 corsair ddr2 xms2 pro at 667mhz with 4-4-4-12-15 1T timing
BFG Tech 7800 GTX 256
74 Gb Raptor.
I run it on the freebie software.
I run it again squeezing out more points at 7012 points ( i have the pics)
but my new official record is now 6979.
This is an air cooled system and I'm soon to invest on water cooling for more overclocking.
In response to DeathwingX:
Nice sig and i say you cant own me in games, my gt owns ur GTX.
1.There must be extra programs running in the background turn them off.
like antivirsus friewall etc.
2.Also go into your driver setup and turnoff AA & AS, also set the slider to performance not quality.
3.Disable some of the startup programs, goto to major geeks to download that software, or ask someone to help you do this.
4.Double check motherboard drivers and graphics card drivers are the latest.
By following the above tips should increase you score. GOODLUCK.
Or you could just change from the default resolution of 1280 x 1024 to what RX8 is using for his scores of 1024 x 768. Don't feel too bad about comparing your scores to his, they're gonna be high at that resolution.
Fritz
Quote:
Good score a little low IMO. Nice sig and i say you cant own me in games, my gt owns ur GTX.
Quote:
as i siad before my GT kills your gtx. 1.There must be extra programs running in the background turn them off.
like antivirsus friewall etc.
2.Also go into your driver setup and turnoff AA & AS, also set the slider to performance not quality.
3.Disable some of the startup programs, goto to major geeks to download that software, or ask someone to help you do this.
4.Double check motherboard drivers and graphics card drivers are the latest.
By following the above tips should increase you score. GOODLUCK.
Or you could just change from the default resolution of 1280 x 1024 to what RX8 is using for his scores of 1024 x 768. Don't feel too bad about comparing your scores to his, they're gonna be high at that resolution.
Fritz
1847 is my high
any suggestions to improve it ?
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectmanager.jsp
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?pr...
any suggestions to improve it ?
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectmanager.jsp
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?pr...
Trunk! You need to reply to my 2gb Overclocking thread! You've got all the right stuff! =D Everybody else who's running A64 and 2gb needs to go post in the cpu oc'n section right now! =P
What mobo are you runnin on? I'd recommend you find some better ram...you'll score higher 1:1 over a divider. Although you should be able to oc easier running with a divider. Are you really running 1.6v to your cpu? Are you madd?! =P I tried 1.5 on my 3800...and i was afraid i was pushing it lol. but then all the top guys are pushing 1.8v (but they have freezer systems too...). Most folk don't push past 1.55.
My 3000 won't go past 245 with 1.45...i suppose i should push a lil harder heh. I'd rather have a low oc then burn it out tho. I really don't think i'll do that unless i push well past that tho. The 3000 doesn't get hot either...=) <houston i think i have a new project...>
I think i've hit the limits of the ram with my 3800, so it probably is about time i pushed that 3000 again, that tccd is just goin to waste. =)
My 3000 won't go past 245 with 1.45...i suppose i should push a lil harder heh. I'd rather have a low oc then burn it out tho. I really don't think i'll do that unless i push well past that tho. The 3000 doesn't get hot either...=) <houston i think i have a new project...>
I think i've hit the limits of the ram with my 3800, so it probably is about time i pushed that 3000 again, that tccd is just goin to waste. =)
I beat your 05 score by 800, but you killed my 06 score by 600 or so...
3dMark06: 3596
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=156732
Time to OC my processor for real!
3dMark06: 3596
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=156732
Time to OC my processor for real!
Ahh. Ok, well scratch those ideas...heh. I got pretty lucky with my 2gb modules, let me push up to 255 1:1, and 270 on a divider. I think i'm hitting my limits though, that's oc'd at 1.5v, and that's all the stupid board lets me have. =).
That said, i loaded in to windows and got the first result of superpi 32m, at 300x9 (with some tccd), but i couldn't make that anywhere near stable. Half my problem is i don't know how the different timings interact though. When shooting for 260 fsb 1:1, i preset to 1.8v or 1.9v depending on which ram i was using, and 3 10 5 5 13 14 3 3 1T. Where i was unstable, i could make it 1/3 the way through superPi 32m. And (15 passes or so), with 2.5 10 3 3 11 22 3 3 1T 1.9v (tccd). Switching the 1T to 2T should have saved me there...but it didn't, when i switched, it would die before the 1st pass. That tccd is so odd. I can get really good or really bad timings completely dependant on that 5th and 6th timing. I think they were twcl and ah something like that...meh that wasn't it, if i had my notes here at work...Oh well. Guess i just need to keep messing with it (or it may be that i just need a little more voltage on the cpu...but 255 is stable at 1.4875v...).
That said, i loaded in to windows and got the first result of superpi 32m, at 300x9 (with some tccd), but i couldn't make that anywhere near stable. Half my problem is i don't know how the different timings interact though. When shooting for 260 fsb 1:1, i preset to 1.8v or 1.9v depending on which ram i was using, and 3 10 5 5 13 14 3 3 1T. Where i was unstable, i could make it 1/3 the way through superPi 32m. And (15 passes or so), with 2.5 10 3 3 11 22 3 3 1T 1.9v (tccd). Switching the 1T to 2T should have saved me there...but it didn't, when i switched, it would die before the 1st pass. That tccd is so odd. I can get really good or really bad timings completely dependant on that 5th and 6th timing. I think they were twcl and ah something like that...meh that wasn't it, if i had my notes here at work...Oh well. Guess i just need to keep messing with it (or it may be that i just need a little more voltage on the cpu...but 255 is stable at 1.4875v...).
Hey Herr, nice scores, nice system.
Have you had any trouble with your G5 locking up on you? I've gotten rid of mine, but i've been watching for other people with similar systems to follow up on it. My g5 would lock up for 20-30sec then unlock. After not being able to solve the issue, i just bought a different mouse, problem solved.
Have you had any trouble with your G5 locking up on you? I've gotten rid of mine, but i've been watching for other people with similar systems to follow up on it. My g5 would lock up for 20-30sec then unlock. After not being able to solve the issue, i just bought a different mouse, problem solved.
My 3dMark06 score was 11910
System:
E8500 3.16ghz dual core (no O.C.)
2GB DDR2 800mhz RAM
GeForce8800GT
running Windows XP PRO and I still need a new harddrive
I would say your score is decent to play some lower end or older games, but if you wanna run the newer games like Crysis and such effectively, you should defiantly get it up. the GeForce8800GT is really quick cheap now, and will allow you to play almost anything. IF you don't mind paying a bit extra I'd just go get something in the 800 or 900 series that's over 512mb.
Just remember that no matter how good your graphics card is, your performance will be limited to your CPU. After upgrading my CPU (which i did a month AFTER my new Graphics Card), I jumped from 17->80 on COD4 full specs 75->210 on CS:S and probably more the quadrupled my old 3dmark06 score.
System:
E8500 3.16ghz dual core (no O.C.)
2GB DDR2 800mhz RAM
GeForce8800GT
running Windows XP PRO and I still need a new harddrive
I would say your score is decent to play some lower end or older games, but if you wanna run the newer games like Crysis and such effectively, you should defiantly get it up. the GeForce8800GT is really quick cheap now, and will allow you to play almost anything. IF you don't mind paying a bit extra I'd just go get something in the 800 or 900 series that's over 512mb.
Just remember that no matter how good your graphics card is, your performance will be limited to your CPU. After upgrading my CPU (which i did a month AFTER my new Graphics Card), I jumped from 17->80 on COD4 full specs 75->210 on CS:S and probably more the quadrupled my old 3dmark06 score.
Related ressources:
- Forum3dmark 06 scores
- Forum3Dmark 06 score
- Forum3dmark 06 score is it ok?
- ForumMy 3DMark 06 Score and 3Dmark Vantage Score ..
- ForumIs my 3dmark ' 06 score normal for a GTX 260 system?
- Forum4890 OC card low 3dmark 06 score (10959 points)
- ForumHows my 3dmark 06 score
- ForumLow 3dmark 06 score
- Forum3DMARK 06 Is my score good?
- Forum3DMark 06 Score WTF?!
- Forum3dmark 06 score
- ForumLow 3DMark 06 score ?
- ForumHD 7870
- ForumAsus 9600XT 3DMark 2001 scores
- Forum3dmark '03 FX5900 Ultra - please post your 3dmark scores h..
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!

