AI Traffic

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

I have ProjectAI commercial airline traffic installed which, I may
have mentioned before, I find impressive. However, I am only operating
the one traffic file and do miss the presence of light GA aircraft at
the smaller airfields which airlines do not visit. Reading the other
day that FS9 supports multiple traffic files I thought I had found a
solution. Using TTools I edited the Aircraft.txt file to remove all
but selected GA aircraft, decompiled and recompiled only to find that
the aircraft.txt file had been re-built as the original. As I don't
want to see the MS fictional airlines does anyone have a work-around
for this? TIA :0))

Iain

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

1. If you haven't done so already, download and install the pack of
official AFCADs from PAI. This will give better results for the
following.

2. Download, install, and run Markus Brunner's GA Traffic program
(ga-traffic_setup.zip at AVSIM). This will populate the flightsim
universe with lots of GA traffic.

3. In your Flight Simulator 9 folder, navigate to the following:
Scenery\World\scenery. Look for the file traffic030528.bgl. Rename it
something else, e.g., traffic030528.bak.

That should do it. You will now have more and better GA traffic, with
none of the fictional airlines.

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://forums.simradar.com
Visit www.simradar.com and try our Flight Simulation Search Engine!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

Iain wrote:
>
>-SNIP-
> Using TTools I edited the Aircraft.txt file to remove all
> but selected GA aircraft, decompiled and recompiled only to find that
> the aircraft.txt file had been re-built as the original.

You edited then DE-compiled? That overwrites the aircraft,airport and
flightplan.txt files with the decompiled contents of the .bgl you
decompiled!

What you need to do is edit the necessary files and then COMPILE
those. Or you might first rename the edited files and compile
them to create a bgl with the new name so you can test your mods
without overwriting the original, should you want to revert.

Paul

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

David Wilson-Okamura <David Wilson-Okamura@forums.simradar.com> wrote in message news:<1113599863.21191@forums.simradar.com>...
> 1. If you haven't done so already, download and install the pack of
> official AFCADs from PAI. This will give better results for the
> following.
>
> 2. Download, install, and run Markus Brunner's GA Traffic program
> (ga-traffic_setup.zip at AVSIM). This will populate the flightsim
> universe with lots of GA traffic.
>
> 3. In your Flight Simulator 9 folder, navigate to the following:
> Scenery\World\scenery. Look for the file traffic030528.bgl. Rename it
> something else, e.g., traffic030528.bak.
>
> That should do it. You will now have more and better GA traffic, with
> none of the fictional airlines.

Thanks David, I'll certainly try that! :0))

Iain

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

Hi,

A simple way is to download one of the AI Split files (which splits the
default AI traffic into GA and Commercial halves). Then compile (or
load) only the GA portion.

Hope this helps,

Iain wrote:
> I have ProjectAI commercial airline traffic installed which, I may
> have mentioned before, I find impressive. However, I am only operating
> the one traffic file and do miss the presence of light GA aircraft at
> the smaller airfields which airlines do not visit. Reading the other
> day that FS9 supports multiple traffic files I thought I had found a
> solution. Using TTools I edited the Aircraft.txt file to remove all
> but selected GA aircraft, decompiled and recompiled only to find that
> the aircraft.txt file had been re-built as the original. As I don't
> want to see the MS fictional airlines does anyone have a work-around
> for this? TIA :0))
>
> Iain