This is interesting. You have started about 3 or 4 others threads pertaining to your CPU being some other core, first you didn't know what it was, than you found out it was a Venice, than you asked about OC'ing a Venice, now you're saying you have a Manchester according to CPU-Z while before it was something else? I ask you to please stop starting these kinds of threads about the same CPU over and over.
The Manchester core is only available with lower clocked X2 cpus. My X2 3800+ is has two Manchester cores. The X2 4800+ is a Toledo core.
There are no AMD 64 3200+ "Manchester" cores. That animal does not exist.
Go by the VIN number.
What you're reading in CPU-Z is a software glitch, an identification erro.
What you have is a Venice.
The only way that CPU-Z could be right is that you have a reject Manchester core. One of the cores wasn't working so they just disabled it and sold it with one working core as a 3200+. Since the speed and cache amount match the X2 3800+ Manchester this is a possibility. Intel does this all the time with processors that don't meet spec so it isn't unreasonable to assume AMD would do the same thing. The performance would be the same and it saves AMD plenty of money.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.