Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

What sucks about PEOPLE

Last response: in CPUs
Share
February 13, 2006 10:07:55 AM

This is for all the forums that go on and on about AMD vs. Intel. I've had enough of this crap, who cares anymore, lots of people use AMD and lots of people use Intel. What ever works for you! And please stop predicting the future of which company will have the better CPU, really no one knows. Both companys are smarter than us and make millions, so lets just drop the AMD vs. Intel life long battle. It's like which is better beef or chicken...mmmm beef and chicken together.

:evil: 

More about : sucks people

February 13, 2006 10:31:12 AM

Yeah, man I'm with you. No one really know the future of cpu's, it could be IBM..... :lol: 
Related resources
February 13, 2006 11:05:04 AM

Perhaps this board should set up an "Argue for Your Product Prejudice" sections, where people who care about this nonsense can go and argue to their hearts content. It's one thing to say why you think one product is better than another for a particular purpose. It's quite another to post demeaning, insulting, name calling comments because someone prefers one product over another. Their are plenty of day tiime TV shows where you can watch people make a total ass of themselves screaming acccusations and insults at each other.
February 13, 2006 11:45:56 AM

Yeah man your right, if you want the fastest buy newest(intel or amd) and the most expensive CPU (depends on your budget). That's the trick..
by the way i love my intel (right now) cause it worth what I paid for.. Just what i need.. but maybe in the future im goin to sayyy... goood.. bye... old fella. Heloo new one..
February 13, 2006 12:28:18 PM

sure thing ... there is nothing wrong with the computer .. is just the looser ... sorry .... user behind the keyboard :lol: 
tips for all amd users....buy an intel
tips for all intel users....buy an amd
February 13, 2006 12:29:55 PM

I think that the truth should always win out. The truth is that AMD beats out Intel in most categories @ a cheaper price point. Intel works but costs too much compared to comparable or better performance on an AMD machine. PERIOD.

If you still 'like' Intel you should really consider why you're giving favors to a large corporation.

I have no bias other than what real world benchmarks show me as well as personal experience.

If Intel beats out next time around, then I'll go with them without giving it a 2nd thought.
February 13, 2006 12:32:57 PM

Theres no real world benchmarks... real world is the exact opposite of benchmarks you can see at every website
February 13, 2006 12:43:35 PM

You know what really sucks about people?

people who believe they have the just right to tell you what to believe. these are the people who are the most ignorant and abnoxious of them all. Even beyond all the fanboys.

but that aside, fanboys aren't necesary bad people, but mis informed people who need a helping hand.

the "best" is what you deam it to be for your tasks at hand.
February 13, 2006 12:44:32 PM

i have always been an amd funboy....recently i`ve changed to intel...and wuaauhhhhh....it rules .. in games in everything... don`t forget guys always compare cpus at the same speed rating.........i used to have an a64 3000+ and i`ve changed to intel 3Ghz......the same card x850xt and the same amount of memory ...now is ddr2 in change...
even the games are running faster......i use antivirus scan in background and other programs......windows equals multitasking heaven ..... i don`t have to worry now about programs running in background cause i have an intel processor......don`t get me wrong amd is good proccesor but when running in multitasking os it drops..........
with the a64 processor i had to stop the antivirus ... and cut other programs in task mannager.............
both cpus are loosing power in multitask but a64 drops faster....and now i can enjoy the game and i can do other work in background
.............there is not much price difference between the two of them..i could even say you`ll find them at the same price in same shops..the only difference is between the mobos........and memory
February 13, 2006 12:51:45 PM

I think that people need to stop all the fanboy junk...or atleast stop forcing their sometimes idiotic opinions on others.
February 13, 2006 12:52:07 PM

some folk upstairs said it all about the real world bench...is your computer back home ....... games, background programs and other stuff.....task manager
February 13, 2006 1:09:06 PM

beef > chicken. always. intel has their perks, but the netburst architecture is a sad piece of shit anyway you look at it.
if i bought an intel machine, i would go for some pentium m overclocking.
February 13, 2006 1:19:10 PM

spoken like a true fanboy
February 13, 2006 1:19:56 PM

Very well spoken :D 
a b à CPUs
February 13, 2006 4:16:11 PM

Quote:
Both companys are smarter than us and make millions, so lets just drop the AMD vs. Intel life long battle. It's like which is better beef or chicken...mmmm beef and chicken together.


Actually AMD makes millions... Intel makes Billions... :p 
a b à CPUs
February 13, 2006 4:19:26 PM

Quote:
i have always been an amd funboy....recently i`ve changed to intel...and wuaauhhhhh....it rules .. in games in everything... don`t forget guys always compare cpus at the same speed rating.........i used to have an a64 3000+ and i`ve changed to intel 3Ghz......the same card x850xt and the same amount of memory ...now is ddr2 in change...
even the games are running faster......i use antivirus scan in background and other programs......windows equals multitasking heaven ..... i don`t have to worry now about programs running in background cause i have an intel processor......don`t get me wrong amd is good proccesor but when running in multitasking os it drops..........
with the a64 processor i had to stop the antivirus ... and cut other programs in task mannager.............
both cpus are loosing power in multitask but a64 drops faster....and now i can enjoy the game and i can do other work in background
.............there is not much price difference between the two of them..i could even say you`ll find them at the same price in same shops..the only difference is between the mobos........and memory


Uh?

Games run faster? I'd be more inclined to believe the Multitasking part when comparing an HT enabled processor vs. a Single Core Athlon64... but the games part is a bust.

AMD processors excel in games, sure recent patches have levelled the playing field (such as Quake4) but in the grand scheme of things, nothing has really changed.

Currently the Athlon64 X2 Processor is the best Multitasking/Gaming processor architecture available.
February 13, 2006 4:21:48 PM

Problem is, it realistically costs 3 billion dollars to start a single new production facility. To repeat, 3 billion dollars, or the entire state of Ohio. Also, only games that take advantage of the extra thread are faster in intel, or should i say.. game? quake4..
a b à CPUs
February 13, 2006 4:25:07 PM

Quote:
Problem is, it realistically costs 3 billion dollars to start a single new production facility. To repeat, 3 billion dollars, or the entire state of Ohio.


Which is why AMD owe's ALOT of money. If fact they mortgaged there fab in Dresden before launching the K8 line.
February 13, 2006 8:02:07 PM

Man are you naiive or what?

So long as there are 2 competitors, fanboyism will never go away. Deal with it.

-mpjesse
February 13, 2006 8:06:41 PM

ppl insult me cuz I use an Intel, and I enjoy using it. It's fast, and well worth the money, and could even beat AMD in an overclocking match. :) 
February 13, 2006 8:17:50 PM

depends what amd vs what intel
February 14, 2006 5:59:15 AM

as long as there is competition between the two .. amd versus intel .. there are always going to be good cpus .. and us happy users .. remember guys always compare cpus in the same class and ratings ..
February 14, 2006 6:16:22 AM

the game part is no bust man .. try for your self (i have no idea ..repet no idea how in god`s name are made all these benchmarks ..) ..... remember i have used a64-s .... and they have dissapointed me ....... i recommend to you to try the new intel cpu...
x2 is not the case in here...if you want a competitor for the x2 try 8xx or 9xx.............you dissapoint me partner .... ht has nothing to do with the games......in windows 99% of the classic programs DO NOT use ht
February 14, 2006 6:24:44 AM

Quote:
and could even beat AMD in an overclocking match

Yup, my 3200 is only good to 25% OC. Maybe I should get rid of the stock fan, and the cheap generic ram.
February 14, 2006 6:28:32 AM

Quote:
remember guys always compare cpus in the same class and ratings ..
I will compare at pricepoint, and not at pr bs rate thank you.
February 14, 2006 6:50:33 AM

yea i reckon! this INTEL versus A.M.D bull has been going on for about 30 years too long, by idiotic noobs who need a life
February 14, 2006 7:47:53 AM

I hate to say it, but I think we give these people even more of a "forum" to speak when we discuss what makes them tick. Or what closes their minds.
February 14, 2006 9:50:39 AM

The Asus fanboys bother me much more than the Intel or AMD ones. They seem to have an attitude that dwarfs the Intel/AMD fanboys. Go AMD! Go Intel! Go Transmeta! Go IBM!
February 14, 2006 11:15:47 AM

cept there really isnt any considering intel owns the market shares..
February 14, 2006 8:33:24 PM

roffle yeah, and who the fuck wants to pay $100 more for a video card that at best get 2 more fps? theres another thread up about somebody's 6800gt asus having a heatsink literally fall off.
February 14, 2006 8:58:29 PM

Quote:
ppl insult me cuz I use an Intel, and I enjoy using it. It's fast, and well worth the money, and could even beat AMD in an overclocking match. :) 

That's only true if you have one of the 65nm chips.
!