a classmate of mine got a 512 MB video card off of Tiger Direct for 139 and it works. I just wonder if it will last.
another poor sucker tripping up in the "more vram is faster" crap - my mates FX5200 256mb is slower then a 64mb GeForce4 Ti4200
Agreed. The dumbest thing--well smartest as far as marketing/business strategy goes--is that the GeForce FX series had no "MX" line. Remember the "Ti" indicates it was designed for the enthusiast. The FX5200 is better known as a GeForce 5 MX520, to put it in perspective. Remember how much the GeForce 4 MX cards sucked? That's the GeForce FX5200.
The FX5700 is really the first card that even compares in speed to the Ti4200. I gotta GeForce 4 4200Ti 64MB card that beats most GeForce FX cards in speed. I also have a GeForce4 MX420 PCI card that obviously sucks, an ancient ATI All-in-Wonder 128 Pro AGP 4X 32MB card, and a couple of S3 Trio 1MB PCI cards for grins (wow I even have the S3 Virge ISA from my 486).
What on earth brought me to this tangeant? Anyways, I'd take a GeForce4 Ti card (EXCEPT for the AGP 4X of the 4200 as it is clocked slower than the 64MB version or the AGP 8X version) over the ATi X300 any day.