Our power drain coverage brought up some interesting questions and more recently and post in this forum which was headlined: "<a href="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/TG-ftopict174924.html">what does TG think of this?</a>"
We did not answer this question from an editorial point of view so far, because we did not feel that the results published on one other website revealed too much info. But it certainly got our attention, and it certainly got the attention of our and other communities. And since you asked the question, here's what the authors of the power drain bug articles think of it.
Yes, we could not be more satisfied with the outcome of our investigations into what we’re calling “the power drain bug.” What more could we possibly expect than a patch to be made available by Microsoft, that will bring back lost battery time for every notebook user? We would be lying to our reader if we completely masked our pride in having been first to publish an article describing the bug, and an article that presents a solution.
Next time, it will be someone else.
And while we believe that the power drain bug brought out the very best in many journalists, it also revealed the very worst. Journalism ethics got trampled on and some of us behaved not much more mature than three-year-olds in a preschool class.
No, we are not excluding TG Daily. We managed to rub a fairly large section of our own protruding bellies, and along the way, unfairly accused other enthusiast sites and technology news services of not doing their jobs. And boy, did we get slapped by our readers. Let's be honest: They were right. Period.
The concept of journalism is based upon ideals; the business of journalism is fraught with cutthroat competition, especially in a field where many publishers battle for the emotional approval of their readers every single minute. And just once in a while, these circumstances can distract us as journalists from what is truly important: what you, our reader, needs to make your everyday life with computers and electronics easier. Even if our commentary article in question was an opinion piece that tossed out a general accusation like a fresh chunk of meat to the sharks, it certainly transgressed a level with which journalists who purport to be ethical should be comfortable. We do regret having published especially those portions that, as we know today, have been inappropriate and sent a wrong signal. Meaning what we say, the article has been removed from our site.
As we are sure you noted, our initial power drain bug article left quite some room for speculation. In our opinion, leaving certain questions open for speculation and discussion was essential, especially to get the ball rolling into a direction that would catalyze a common commitment toward seeking a solution. It was not the time for us to have been pointing fingers of blame; it was the time to keep all participants focused on the interests of their customers and our readers. Unfortunately, the problem with casting fresh meat over the side of the boat is that certain parties swimming around outside the boat are likely to interpret it as chum. So we shouldn’t have been too surprised to have found ourselves encountering a feeding frenzy.
So, as the fellow says toward the end of the PBS kids’ lecture on the alphabet, what did we learn today? How we plan to react to accusations raised against TG Daily, which alleged that we violated our responsibility by delivering incomplete data in our power drain bug coverage? Hopefully, we’ve proven those allegations <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/02/14/microsoft_to_release_patch_for_power_drain_bug/">wrong</a>; but the question still stands: Are we going to take this lying down, or come out swinging? The fact is, we’re tempted to play in that sandbox from time to time – the sandbox where kids pile on top of the biggest hills and claim to be king of all they perceive. And yes, we almost took up the challenge, until our senses got the better of us.
Just because somebody else has taken up the task of building those sandboxes, climbing to the top of their little hills and waving sticks at us, doesn’t mean we have some innate responsibility to play with them any more. It’s time for us to tuck our shirts in, come off of the playground, and join you in the real world. And if the other kids want to play responsibly, they can join us.
When we get distracted, though, do send us an e-mail to bring us back to our good senses.
And of course we are interested in your opinion. What do you think?
We did not answer this question from an editorial point of view so far, because we did not feel that the results published on one other website revealed too much info. But it certainly got our attention, and it certainly got the attention of our and other communities. And since you asked the question, here's what the authors of the power drain bug articles think of it.
Yes, we could not be more satisfied with the outcome of our investigations into what we’re calling “the power drain bug.” What more could we possibly expect than a patch to be made available by Microsoft, that will bring back lost battery time for every notebook user? We would be lying to our reader if we completely masked our pride in having been first to publish an article describing the bug, and an article that presents a solution.
Next time, it will be someone else.
And while we believe that the power drain bug brought out the very best in many journalists, it also revealed the very worst. Journalism ethics got trampled on and some of us behaved not much more mature than three-year-olds in a preschool class.
No, we are not excluding TG Daily. We managed to rub a fairly large section of our own protruding bellies, and along the way, unfairly accused other enthusiast sites and technology news services of not doing their jobs. And boy, did we get slapped by our readers. Let's be honest: They were right. Period.
The concept of journalism is based upon ideals; the business of journalism is fraught with cutthroat competition, especially in a field where many publishers battle for the emotional approval of their readers every single minute. And just once in a while, these circumstances can distract us as journalists from what is truly important: what you, our reader, needs to make your everyday life with computers and electronics easier. Even if our commentary article in question was an opinion piece that tossed out a general accusation like a fresh chunk of meat to the sharks, it certainly transgressed a level with which journalists who purport to be ethical should be comfortable. We do regret having published especially those portions that, as we know today, have been inappropriate and sent a wrong signal. Meaning what we say, the article has been removed from our site.
As we are sure you noted, our initial power drain bug article left quite some room for speculation. In our opinion, leaving certain questions open for speculation and discussion was essential, especially to get the ball rolling into a direction that would catalyze a common commitment toward seeking a solution. It was not the time for us to have been pointing fingers of blame; it was the time to keep all participants focused on the interests of their customers and our readers. Unfortunately, the problem with casting fresh meat over the side of the boat is that certain parties swimming around outside the boat are likely to interpret it as chum. So we shouldn’t have been too surprised to have found ourselves encountering a feeding frenzy.
So, as the fellow says toward the end of the PBS kids’ lecture on the alphabet, what did we learn today? How we plan to react to accusations raised against TG Daily, which alleged that we violated our responsibility by delivering incomplete data in our power drain bug coverage? Hopefully, we’ve proven those allegations <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/02/14/microsoft_to_release_patch_for_power_drain_bug/">wrong</a>; but the question still stands: Are we going to take this lying down, or come out swinging? The fact is, we’re tempted to play in that sandbox from time to time – the sandbox where kids pile on top of the biggest hills and claim to be king of all they perceive. And yes, we almost took up the challenge, until our senses got the better of us.
Just because somebody else has taken up the task of building those sandboxes, climbing to the top of their little hills and waving sticks at us, doesn’t mean we have some innate responsibility to play with them any more. It’s time for us to tuck our shirts in, come off of the playground, and join you in the real world. And if the other kids want to play responsibly, they can join us.
When we get distracted, though, do send us an e-mail to bring us back to our good senses.
And of course we are interested in your opinion. What do you think?