Netscreen support experience?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.vpn (More info?)

Hello,

Has anyone had experience with support of NetScreen/Juniper products? I am
thoroughly disgusted with SonicWall support and am wondering if NetScreen
appliances might be a better future hardware path for us.

 

[popeye]

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.vpn (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:14:02 GMT, "J. McGoggin"
<johnmcgoggin@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Has anyone had experience with support of NetScreen/Juniper products? I am
>thoroughly disgusted with SonicWall support and am wondering if NetScreen
>appliances might be a better future hardware path for us.
>

I used the Netscreen 5XP and 50XP firewalls in my last job and they
are solid pieces of equipment. They are very easy to configure through
either a web interface or a traditional telnet CLI prompt.

With their ease of use and reliability IMO I would say that they are a
viable option if you are on a tight budget compared to more expensive
products.

Paul

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.vpn (More info?)

Hi,

What sort of unresolved issues are you having with the sonicwall
(other than the dissatisfaction with their support) ?

joe

Popeye <pgcomputing@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:<n86mm0hdl3o61l1l7gqaniknu7ic659lvn@4ax.com>...
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:14:02 GMT, "J. McGoggin"
> <johnmcgoggin@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >Has anyone had experience with support of NetScreen/Juniper products? I am
> >thoroughly disgusted with SonicWall support and am wondering if NetScreen
> >appliances might be a better future hardware path for us.
> >
>
> I used the Netscreen 5XP and 50XP firewalls in my last job and they
> are solid pieces of equipment. They are very easy to configure through
> either a web interface or a traditional telnet CLI prompt.
>
> With their ease of use and reliability IMO I would say that they are a
> viable option if you are on a tight budget compared to more expensive
> products.
>
> Paul