More and more proof that dell will use AMD sooner than later.
http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2698
http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2698
Forget Dell, they suck monkey nuts.
Forget Dell, they suck monkey nuts.
More and more proof that dell will use AMD sooner than later.
Forget Dell, they suck monkey nuts.
I concur, ever since i tried to upgrade an old socket A processor in a dell machine and realized that they modified the slot so mainstream processors wouldnt fit, ive stayed as far away as possible.
RealTechNews also specifically refers to The Inquierer as it's source in this rumour which is interesting since this is the same Inquirer that released an article indicating how "Dell will not pick up AMD".And if we had a cent for every time there was a rumour that Dell was gonna use AMD chips we'd be able to afford to marry that profligate Adamson Rust.
If AMD has little or no spare capacity right now, why would Dell switch and push themselves into a dead end? If 65nm won't be ready "until very late '06" or 2007 there is no reason why Dell will switch anytime soon.AMD also has about the same, but AMD’s main problem right now is supply. As I said, their chips are selling as fast, or in many cases faster, than they can produce them. The upcoming 65-nanometer process should definitely help with this problem (smaller chips = more chips per silicon wafer) but where Intel is pushing it out this year, it had seemed like AMD wouldn’t release 65-nanometer chips until very late ‘06 or possibly ‘07.
That is an absurd reason for Dell to switch to AMD processors. Granted in the desktop segment, AMD processors outperform Intel ones, but the difference isn't drastic especially in the everyday tasks that Dell's computers are marketed toward. Even power consumption and heat is not as large an issue as it once was as Intel matures it's 65nm process. It has long been reported that the 3.2GHz 940 would drop in TDP to 95W, now Intel has announced that the 3.4GHz 950 will fit into that power envelope as well.Yeah I know, but they'll be really helpful in the notebook and desktop segment. Servers are well covered with HP and Sun.
The only the only sector that makes sense for Dell to switch to Intel is the server market, specifically the 4-way and higher segment. This is where AMD's Direct Connect Architecture is particularly useful allowing it to pull ahead decidedly. It's interesting that this is the sector that you discount since:So called mobile lifestyle notebooks, devices with 14" and 15" screens are indicated to exceed five hours of battery time when launched in Q4.
Servers are well covered with HP and Sun.
Why did Apple pick Intel instead of AMD?
AMD was approached, but supply problems similar to those with IBM appeared likely. Also, Intel has been courting Apple for many years. Perhaps some of that effort has paid off. Further, this announcement was designed to be one of political expedience, convenience, exclusivity, and simplicity. The focus was to not scare the analysts and financial markets; those circles are happy with the "Intel" announcement. Further, you must look at Intel's roadmap one to two years into the future to see the types of processors Apple will be using; they're not Pentium 4, but will represent the advanced next generation of Intel's microprocessor designs. Finally, since Apple has shown it is willing to switch processor architectures entirely, nothing prevents Apple from availing itself of the best x86 and x86-64 processor technologies available from other x86 vendors once the x86 transition is complete or well underway - including those from AMD, as do many other PC vendors.
If AMD would have drawn up a roadmap like Intel did, maybe they would be used in Apple and Dell machines already. Like I've said before, Intel, Apple and Dell are innovators in the this industry. Marketing plays such a huge role in all this and that is where AMD is weak.
http://appleintelfaq.com/
The only the only sector that makes sense for Dell to switch to Intel is the server market, specifically the 4-way and higher segment. This is where AMD's Direct Connect Architecture is particularly useful allowing it to pull ahead decidedly
Linkage plzI can assure you that Dell will not be going with AMD anytime in the forseeable future.
Dell doesn't even touch 1/3 to 1/2 of the computers they sell. Intel builds the entire system, slaps a dell logo on it, and sends it out directly to the customer that placed the order. Overlooking that little fact arent we?