Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > What's "normal" for CPU usage for ICH7R RAID 0

What's "normal" for CPU usage for ICH7R RAID 0

Forum Storage : Hard Disks - What's "normal" for CPU usage for ICH7R RAID 0

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I have x2 Hitachi T7K250's 250Gig in RAID 0 on an Intel ICH7R controller.

Stripe size, transfer speed (1.5Gbps vs 3.0Gpbs), and NTFS Cluster size doesn't seem to make a difference in terms of "real world" use and CPU utilization.

All the benchmarking tools report about an average of 5% for CPU utilization, but doing a simple file copy on the same RAID 0 volume in WinXP Pro drives that up closer to 25% (with nothing else running including antivirus) when looking at task manager performance.

It's a new system with a new volume, so I don't have all the extras loaded or a frag issue.

I'm also using the latest Intel ICH7R driver (1035).

Before downgrading the driver or running out and getting a different controller to test with, what is "normal" for real-world CPU Utilization and RAID 0 on this controller?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Writes use more CPU % than reads in my experience.

Reply to Codesmith

How about overall CPU usage though?

Is 20% normal for a simple file copy?

Thanks

Reply to Scottz
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > What's "normal" for CPU usage for ICH7R RAID 0
Go to:

There are 801 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them