i said that, i was comparing the 3700 and 4000, comparing that it was the saem core, same cache, just clocked 200 mhz slower, if he wants to game, he will be MUCH happier with the 3700 and x1900(any flavor) i wasnt calling u an idiot, i was calling the idea stupid. theres no reason to buy the fastest chip if hes willing to oc a SMALL amount to match perforamnce of a chip thats over 50 dollars more, i cant believe ur actually argueing over this, ur saying taht its worth the extra 50+ dollars for 200mhz which will show 0% difference in games, whereas the x1900 is probably a good 60% faster than the x850 with AA and AF, it really is no contest. but the person who made this thread needs to be more specific, if hes gaming, encoding, or anything other. for gaming, id recommend a 3500+ and overclock it, the extra 512cache = about 200mhz, a 3500 will pretty easily overclock to 2.6, making it about as fast as a stock 4000+ (if the 512cache = 200mhz thing is actually true) but between the 2 things u posted, its no contest, no matter what ur doing (as long as ur willing to do a small amount of oc'ing) 3700+ and x1900xt(x) is best choice hands down. now to decide between a x1900xt and xtx... x1900xt... if u plan to overclock, if u dont wanna risk it (not really a big risk...) id say the x1900xtx if u can afford it, either way u wont be disapointed with that setup, with a 4000+ and x850xt u will be, because ull go to play hl2 lost coast and turn on HDR to find ur card maxing out at 60fps looking at a wall, the x1900xt will eat that game up and beg for more boasting above 80fps average