Study Names Manchester UK's Piracy Capital

Status
Not open for further replies.

greghome

Distinguished
Dec 30, 2009
477
0
18,810
Again, I still think these record companies are just hyping things up.

The companies and artist still make millions even with the amount of "pirates" , they're just sad that not every record release can match last seasons sales when the artist these days are popping out more and more crap (Justin Bieber, Nicki Minaj....etc ).

They're kinda like Apple once you think about it,
they're done competing and will just settle with blaming other sources even though it's their inability to release a good product that has cost them profit.
 
G

Guest

Guest
and now Rihana can only afford 4 mansions not 5... o poor Rihana... you're broke due to piracy....
 

iceman1992

Distinguished
Sep 6, 2011
118
0
18,680
[citation][nom]randomderpherp[/nom]and now Rihana can only afford 4 mansions not 5... o poor Rihana... you're broke due to piracy....[/citation]
Yeah 4 instead of 5 mansions a month
 

back_by_demand

Splendid
BANNED
Jul 16, 2009
4,821
0
22,780
[citation][nom]JohnMD1022[/nom]Manchester is also one of the European centers of Muslim dominance and unrest.Coincidence?[/citation]
As someone who is from Manchester, I can say you are talking shite
 

deksman

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2011
233
19
18,685
It doesn't matter that the companies are over-hyping things (the numbers and overall situation)...
We still live in a monetary system, and their primary concern are profits.

Not that it would matter either way... because those who pirated the songs and everything else probably would never waste their time on 'buying' it even if pirating wasn't an option.

Besides, as it was already mentioned, studios and artists still rake in millions... but it doesn't matter.
They operate within the monetary system, and in such a system, greed is promoted and applauded (even though its nothing more than learned behavior that twists peoples perceptions and values).
 
" A lot of people are getting very rich from stealing other people's things."

Really? How exactly are pirates getting rich for downloading some albums? AFAIK, they're not selling the darn things, are they? Even those that sell fake CDs are copying them from an original they bought earlier.
Just because the greedy record companies lose a sale does not mean someone somewhere makes that sale. They're just saving some money they already have, not making extra, hence not becoming rich.

I am not making the case for pirates, just outlining the faulty logic that record companies employ in order to justify their greed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.