According to this article from Bloomberg, Intel is having a hard time competing with AMD.
| Quote : ``Intel is stacking up very poorly against Advanced Micro,' said Rick Whittington, a research director at Caris & Co. He cut his rating to ``underperform' from ``neutral' today. ``Intel has been sleeping for about seven years now and they thought they had AMD on the ropes.' |
Read the whole thing here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=au70rbyfuj7o&refer=top_world_news
yay intel is down intel is down thats what you get for spendin more money on marketing than r&d!
Actually, I like this article a bit better.
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/03/03/ [...] 06_update/
Again, I don't care for the enquirers way of writing articles. Makes me think of being at the special olympics for writers.
In conclusion, another shot in the foot for Intel. If they want to stay afloat, they better concentrate on their products.
| Quote :
|
Don't think you need to worry about them staying afloat just yet.......after all how many years ago was it that people were wondering just how long AMD could "stay afloat" and now look. See how fortunes can change with some good hard work? For me I am glad to see Intel get slapped in the face with this. For too long they have been bullying oems to use intel and now finally people are beginning to see the light and not all of Intel's bullsh#t
I agree. As I have said on here before, I have seen a few analysts that say that their mobile division is currently the only one turning a profit. (Though a lot of that would be due to the R&D investment of an entriely new chip design).
Maybe if they continue to slide, they will open their eyes and stop being so damn stubborn. How long did it take them to admit GHz wasn't they way to go? I wonder how long before they give in and use HyperTransport??
| Quote : I agree. As I have said on here before, I have seen a few analysts that say that their mobile division is currently the only one turning a profit. (Though a lot of that would be due to the R&D investment of an entriely new chip design).
|
They're never going to use HTT, they're going with their CSI-HTT-Wannabe approach, but it's expected to perform on par or below that of HTT.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
I know they won't I just think they should. They are too accustomed to being the market leader to accept anyone else's, especially AMD or IBM's, innovations.
Ah its not who builds the best chip thats caused this. Intel did admit that AMD took an estimated point (1) out of their market share but that in itself did not cause this number.
There is a slowing of PC purchases world wide that is the culprit. Intel being #1 supplier is first to get the bullet. There will be a trickle down effect in which all manufacturers will get the pinch, AMD included.
Out of all those manufacturers who do you think is better insulated to absorb such a down turn?
That doesn't really make sense, since AMD's growth has been so large lately. They have posted record sales in each of the last (4?) quarters, which seems to belie your statements.
| Quote : That doesn't really make sense, since AMD's growth has been so large lately. They have posted record sales in each of the last (4?) quarters, which seems to belie your statements. |
I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect
. Lord knows there's alot of those lately 8O.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
| Quote : That doesn't really make sense, since AMD's growth has been so large lately. They have posted record sales in each of the last (4?) quarters, which seems to belie your statements. |
I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect
. Lord knows there's alot of those lately 8O.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time hey mike wanna take him down?
| Quote : That doesn't really make sense, since AMD's growth has been so large lately. They have posted record sales in each of the last (4?) quarters, which seems to belie your statements. |
I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect
. Lord knows there's alot of those lately 8O.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time hey mike wanna take him down?
....Jesus Christ Piddy
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
| Quote : That doesn't really make sense, since AMD's growth has been so large lately. They have posted record sales in each of the last (4?) quarters, which seems to belie your statements. |
I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect
. Lord knows there's alot of those lately 8O.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time hey mike wanna take him down?
Careful their Piddy, hes a mafioso from New Jersey.
if he was then why is his name ratbait
| Quote : if he was then why is his name ratbait |
Because that's what he makes all his victims.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
| Quote : if he was then why is his name ratbait |
Because that's what he makes all his victims.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time oh lol
| Quote : I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect |
I thought this was an open discussion about Intel's numbers and AMD's numbers? Thought this was what this thread was about. Mind explaining what I said wrong?
And so WTF is it of your business that I just joined? You treat all people new or old that way?
And DVD I still see you typing with one hand. Must be tiny, use tweezers next time.
| Quote : I think he's one of the just-joined-TomzForumz people who needs to sound like he's smart so he can get respect |
I thought this was an open discussion about Intel's numbers and AMD's numbers? Thought this was what this thread was about. Mind explaining what I said wrong?
And so WTF is it of your business that I just joined? You treat all people new or old that way?
And DVD I still see you typing with one hand. Must be tiny, use tweezers next time.
Due to the severe influx in quantities of influencial marginially exponentially greater than.... <=== See that, that's you, that's what you sound like
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
Mike, maybe my English is foreign to you. But I did write it in an 8th grade prose which I'm sure you could understand.
| Quote : Mike, maybe my English is foreign to you. But I did write it in an 8th grade prose which I'm sure you could understand. |
Dude, check out this, I have red spots on my T-Shirt cuz I ate a bag of frozen strawberries and wiped it on my shirt, you think it's stained? I hope not...I like this T-Shirt, it's all white and stuff.... actually it's white and red and stuff right now... :?.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
| Quote :
|
Well, since we are having an open discussion forum, and I have already given you evidence to disprove what you said originally, here is some more:
"AMD's surge can be seen most strongly in the U.S. retail market, which accounts for about 9 percent of global PC shipments. In the first seven weeks of 2006, AMD's share in desktops in that area climbed to 81.5 percent, while Intel's has slid to 18.5 percent, Baker said. That's almost a complete reversal of their typical relative positions. In notebooks, Intel's share has declined to 63 percent, even though Baker and others generally agree that Intel enjoys a technological advantage in laptops.
The retail PC market itself is holding steady, Baker noted. "Overall volume is OK through the first six to eight weeks of the year. We're still growing in double digits in notebooks and single digits in desktops," he said." The full article can be seen here
That seems like a bit more than 1 point in a market that is hardly slumping.
Your thoughts??
I disagree. AMD has capitalized on Intels faults and marketing schemes. They did this just by putting out a good product and in all reality, word of mouth. AMD has bitten into Intels market share and will more than likely, continue to do so.
I agree with what you said. AMD market share has increased. What I am saying is that the overall industry is slowing. PC sales are slowing. Which means slow CPU sales, slow GPU sales, HD sales, etc.
Who is the first to bite the bullet when that happens? Intel.
Because AMD is not as large marketwise as Intel, and when the industry says its going to happen how badly will it hit AMD? If numbers are correct it should be identical to Intels percentage wise, if not less do to market share.
Which means as industry people say, Intel will reduce prices. Can AMD compete? I would certainly like to see the F62 price fall or any of the X2's. And I think alot here would like to see that too.
| Quote : I agree with what you said. AMD market share has increased. What I am saying is that the overall industry is slowing. PC sales are slowing. Which means slow CPU sales, slow GPU sales, HD sales, etc.
|
Going by real logic, AMD should be the one to "bite the bullet" first. If there are declines in sales as you claim, than AMD should be taking a major hit since they supposedly don't have high sales anyways. Intel, with all the money they have and dominance, they shouldn't be taking a hit as large as AMD. BTW: Still waiting for your response on my Strawberry Shirt dilemma.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
What you want a bibb?
Now comes the tricky part, if AMD bites it bad, and reduces prices, can they keep up with the stampede that will happen?
Like the rush for X360 will there be enough to go around?
| Quote : What you want a bibb?
|
Well, I daresay that AMD's production process if somewhat better than the X360, since a large number fo those that were release had defects. I think they can do it, becuase they will be planning to dump off a lot of S-939 era chips soon for the AM2 release.
| Quote : What you want a bibb?
|
I bite food bad...real hard so when I swallow, it goes down nicely. x360 is a PoS. BTW: I use my T-Shirts as bibs, that's why I buy so many
. I like this shirt, looks like it has blood on it and I think I am cool because of it 8).
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
[quote="Ratbait"]What you want a bibb?
OUCH! simple yet effective! Whats next Dipers and Bottles?
Anyway, I got to agree with 3M here. Intel being as big could absorb the blow better than a smaller company in a declining market. But AMD has grown! And everybody is saying ( talking about investment Co. and watch dogs here ) that at this pace AMD will take more ground= ( new customers ) and grow, just by takeing Intels market shares= ( prior clients )
And the $10,000 pyrmaid answer is. AMD is kicking Intels a$$ like a rabid dog ! This goes to show that while Intel makes hidden deals ( skype, Dell..etc ), and BS marketing schemes ( where better! ) Amd took them by surprise by provideing a superior product, beating them at their own benchmarks, and last but not least By Word Of Mouth without the ( I'm better than you game. )
AMD actions in this case spoke louder then Intel's words! ...end story
Its not who is going to come out first, its what is in store for the consumer price wise. Make the chips affordable!
Intel made almost 40 billion in 05 and 35 billion in 04. Don't feel sorry for these guys they are going to be OK. If I remeber amd had about a 20% market share in 2001. Does anybody remember what happened then?
There are 778 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

