Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Clovertown Quad Core - 8

Clovertown Quad Core - 8

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Clovertown Quad Core - 8

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Eh nice improvement though i thought 2 was more than enough. More is always welcomed though.

Reply to CompGeek

Is the author assuming that the system is a dual socket quad core machine? Don't forget that hyperthreaded processors show twice as many cores as they actually have in Windows. . .

But if it is what the author says it is that's pretty freaking cool! Imagine how many proteins your could fold with 8 cores chugging away.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator
- 0 +

Hows many FPS in BF2 would that Processor get you with that 4 cars SLi machine from Gigabyte :lol:

Reply to lashton
- 0 +

AMD is already sampling their quad core Opteron to board makers.

I believe it operates on Socket F.

Reply to mpjesse

Wow that is crazy dual socket boards that supports 8 cores! Is there gonna be a game board makers that would support dual socket and SLI?

Man, the benchmark would blow my score like its' nothing! 8O

Reply to chuckshissle
- 0 +

I don't think I will EVER need more than 2 graphics cards for any reason.
However, since the CPUs are contained in one big chip, I can see myself having 2 or more CPUs on the mobo.

Anyone know if there was ever talk about having a graphic card on a chip like some notebooks do? I think the RAM on the card is the limiting factor.

Reply to enewmen

From what I have seen, its not a true quad core system, but rather two seperate Dual cores on one chip. Very similar to their first Dual Implementation. I know it almost seems like splitting hairs, but there is a difference in performance.

Reply to hergieburbur
- 0 +

I rather see a true quad-core chip.
Even if the performance is the same.

I am not a hardware engineer. But from what little I know, making a true quad-core chip should have some opprotunity for some design optimizations. Where as 2 or 4 seperate (independent) cores on one die is not intended to function as a multi-core die.

I assume things like cache is better left seperate to avoid conflicts.

Can someone that really knows about this help me out.
Thanks!

Reply to enewmen

Quote :

I rather see a true quad-core chip.
Even if the performance is the same.

I am not a hardware engineer. But from what little I know, making a true quad-core chip should have some opprotunity for some design optimizations. Where as 2 or 4 seperate (independent) cores on one die is not intended to function as a multi-core die.

I assume things like cache is better left seperate to avoid conflicts.

Can someone that really knows about this help me out.
Thanks!



I DO know about this stuff, my degree is as a hardware engineer, though its been years since I have worked with hardware design. You are right. Your intercommunications are faster with a true quad core, and the cache should be seperate or you gain the overhead of having to avoid conflicts.

Reply to hergieburbur

I was reading up on Core features a bit, and I take back what I said about the cache. The Core Architecture will use a shared cache system with an optimized scheduler to avoid collisions. Not real sure how this will affect performance.

Reply to hergieburbur
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Clovertown Quad Core - 8
Go to:

There are 532 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them