Should Canon????

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

In article <7X1zd.3024$yV1.1368@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, measekite wrote:
> It would be of great benefit if Canon would choose 5 photographs of
> different types and supply prints using photo paper pro and their 2nd
> best photo glossy using each printer so one could compare results as
> well as features. I sort of get the feeling that they do not want us to
> be able to compare because we may find out that certain printers do not
> provide the marginal benefits for the marginal costs.
>
> And maybe others do.

In Europe you can select images they will print on different printers
and send to you. Or you can upload your own.

--
Povl H. Pedersen - NoSpam@my.terminal.dk (yes - it works)
Fastnet - IP telefoni: 5 kr/md Se http://www.musimi.dk

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

PC Medic wrote:
> "measekite" <measekite@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:7X1zd.3024$yV1.1368@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> > It would be of great benefit if Canon would choose 5 photographs of

> > different types and supply prints using photo paper pro and their
2nd best
> > photo glossy using each printer so one could compare results as
well as
> > features. I sort of get the feeling that they do not want us to be
able
> > to compare because we may find out that certain printers do not
provide
> > the marginal benefits for the marginal costs.
> >
> > And maybe others do.
>
> I got a feeling they do not include them to keep the costs down.
> If they did include them, your next post subject would read, "why do
Canon
> printers cost more?"

Cost more than what? The canon I bought last spring costed several
hundered dollars less than the Epson that was nearly tied for my
first choice.

Mike