Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » PROOF - Conroe Was Not Faithful
 

PROOF - Conroe Was Not Faithful




Word :   Username :  
 
 Page : 1 2
Previous
Author
 Thread : PROOF - Conroe Was Not Faithful
 
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/ [...] chine.html

Now who's the dumbass?

"Set Cool 'n' Quiet Default to Disabled

- With Cool & Quiet enabled, AMD processors will throttle in order to save power and bring their thermal load down. This means the processor could be running as low as 800MHz in certain programs – no matter what the program is. In theory Cool & Quiet is supposed to throttle up to maximum in games but this is not always the case. No enthusiast PC goes out with Cool & Quiet enabled unless it’s a fanless machine or media center.

Add Support for AMD Athlon 64 FX60 CPU

- According to DFI the FX-60 will not operate correctly without this bios update. Without official support for the FX-60 CPU I’m not sure what we’re comparing against here.

Fix Memory Timings 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 Mode Wrong & Fix Read Preamble Table Error.

- Memory latency can make a massive difference in performance. If the latency was not running at the correct latency we can see a pretty big difference in all kinds of performance. Anandtech stated “The AMD system used 1GB of DDR400 running at 2-2-2/1T timings…” Apparently this isn’t the case, but they would not be able to tell without having the platform in house.

Fix Fill 3114 SVID&SSID under Cross fire mode.
- More apparent performance issues under Crossfire mode.

Next, when you take a future Intel chipset and compare it to a chipset that no enthusiast supports (RD480) with an outdated bios it’s like taking a Ferrari and putting it on Bias-Ply tires. It’s just not a good way to show off a “new” technology."

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Intel's way to screw the competition (they always did) no matter at what cost. Nice find.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Clearly you since you've posted that crap 50 times now.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Quote :

Clearly you since you've posted that crap 50 times now.



AND ILL POST IT 50 MORE TIMES UNTIL EVERY SINGLE FANBOY KISSES MY ASS

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/ [...] chine.html

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Still playing my Dreamcast
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Fun.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Quote :

Fun.



Too bad Conroe is fake, looks like you fanboys are pretty stupid for insulting the few people (me included) who didnt' believe lies, tisk tisk fanboys.

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/ [...] chine.html

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

How is conroe a lie? Its performance wont be any different. Such a lame troll, scurry back on to under your bridge.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

You. That is an interesting article. Nontheless, the majority of us are not talking about Conroe killing AMD. We are talking about how Intel is getting back into the game, and possibly starting up a price war/performance war from which we will benefiet. The simple fact is this, you cannot stand that Intel is trying to fix their problems, anyone who expresses excitement you will call a troll. You laugh and say that everybody is jumping on you, but that is because you brought that on yourself by how you treated other members of this forum.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Quote :

How is conroe a lie? Its performance wont be any different. Such a lame troll, scurry back on to under your bridge.



lol, I don't care about IT's, the fact that K8 > CONROE IS F*CKING HILLARIOUS!!

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/ [...] chine.html

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Profile: addict
More Information

lolz... OHHHH.. i forgot.. you're a intel fanboyz.. so you don't know squad about cpus huh...

let me ask you..
how does ram latency not make a difference to performance?
how does cpu support not make a difference to performance?
how does SSID support not make a difference to performance?

hey mike... they probably just can't accept the truth.. that's why they just throws insults and ignorance all around the room, and continue to live in their little world XD

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Quote :

lolz... OHHHH.. i forgot.. you're a intel fanboyz.. so you don't know squad about cpus huh...

let me ask you..
how does ram latency not make a difference to performance?
how does cpu support not make a difference to performance?
how does SSE/SSID support not make a difference to performance?

hey mike... they probably just can't accept the truth.. that's why they just throws insults and ignorance all around the room, and continue to live in their little world XD



Lol I know, I guess since I was one of the only people to still believe in AMD, and now I have PROOF, they can't just say "we're sorry, let's forget this", I would just move on, but I still get flamed after proving Conroe was rigged, it's sad.

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/ [...] chine.html

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Profile: addict
More Information

seriously.. they just don't know what they are talking about

and also..

how do you know if its really FX -60? anand tech didn't take off the heatsink fan and take a picture of FX-60. maybe its actually an athlon xp XD..

OOOOHHH.. i forgot.. intel probably wouldn't let them take off the heatsink huh.. then their little "conroe is 20% + in performance" is nothing but a LIE

HOLY!!! "Conroe has shown a 20% improve against retiring AMD Athlon XP"...
how does that sound? :D

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Sure troll.

I'm sure they would have run CPUZ and/or various diagnostics or something to test everything out.

Quote :

how does ram latency not make a difference to performance?
how does cpu support not make a difference to performance?
how does SSE/SSID support not make a difference to performance?



1. It does but it'd be minimal.
2. Minimal difference.
3. Minimal again.

Jez you cry babies need to get over that AMD have been trumped. They'll come back with socket AM2 and trump intel and extend the lead further when they roll out 65nm. Sad little fan boys.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Quote :

Sure troll.

I'm sure they would have run CPUZ and/or various diagnostics or something to test everything out.

how does ram latency not make a difference to performance?
how does cpu support not make a difference to performance?
how does SSE/SSID support not make a difference to performance?



1. It does but it'd be minimal.
2. Minimal difference.
3. Minimal again.

Jez you cry babies need to get over that AMD have been trumped. They'll come back with socket AM2 and trump intel and extend the lead further when they roll out 65nm. Sad little fan boys.

Oh shut up you stupid moron, Conroe was proved to be a hack, get over yourself and stop denying, sheesh.

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

How is conroe a hack? Wrong again you lame troll.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Still believe in AMD? What is this a religion? Mad Mike I have said this a million times and I will say it one more, the majority of us are NOT writting off AMD. We are merely speculating on whether or not Intel will regain the crown, and if not, what effect will this have on the industry? How will AMD responed? You seem to know alot about AMD, someone hinted that you worked for them. If you do, then can you say that AMD has something up it's sleeve? If not then why the flaming? You also got this bent out of shape when people said that AM2 wasn't shapping up like we thought it might? Why? If your goal is to make people want to people buy AMD do you think this bully tactic will work? Why is it that I am an intel fanboy, even though I have never posted anything anti-amd, have in fact asked whether or not I should get an opteron or an athlon x2, and as of recently asked you to stop bullying other members of this forum. I see nothing that makes me an intel fanboy. Or is it just because I do not have an AMD tatoo on my head? Is it because I am thinking about the possibility of buying a Conroe? How about this. Hypothetically, what if intel did beat AMD, hypothetically speaking, would me buying the intel processor because it was better make me a fanboy? Would you say, ok I was wrong, or would you become like the intel fanboys on this thread who said AMD sucked even when the benchmarks clearly showed otherwise?

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information
n°987533
03-09-2006 at 03:55:03 AM
Hide