I have an idea all of you might want to think about .
I'm Intel , I've really got nothing to show right now , AMD has 80% market share in the retail and it's not looking good at all .
Conroe is still 6 months away but it's a good chip , it doesn't have an amazing performance but it's not bad either . It's about the same level as an A64 right now . But that doesn't sound too amazing , does it ?
So here's the plan :
You take a hand picked Conroe that can do much more than stock , let's say something above 3 Ghz and put it on a rig you build to go against an overclocked FX-60 .
But since it's you setup and everything why not just tweak it a little bit . Leave the FX-60 be and even make it seem it has an advantage . Now for the Conroe some special BIOS tweaking would be nice , wouldn't it ? How about something that says the CPU is running at 2.66 Ghz even if it's at over 3 Ghz ? That would be nice , wouldn't it .
And there you go , you have some lovely benchmarks to show the press . They'll be impressed for sure , everyone will talk about it . You'll have some people change their minds , especially in the retail and wait for the awsome Conroe to come out . There goes some of AMD's 80 % .
I want some real stuff here people . Why couldn't Intel do this or something similar . The only one reason I can think of is that the truth will be out in 6 months but that's not a really good one . Conroe is going to be good enough by then even if I doubt it's going to be a monster and people tend to forget in time .
P.S. : Let's not forget the "modified" ATI driver Intel used on both platforms . We all know how well some video drivers can perform if they are tweaked a bit and if they recognize the Conroe for the speed monster it really is :lol: .
I'm Intel , I've really got nothing to show right now , AMD has 80% market share in the retail and it's not looking good at all .
Conroe is still 6 months away but it's a good chip , it doesn't have an amazing performance but it's not bad either . It's about the same level as an A64 right now . But that doesn't sound too amazing , does it ?
So here's the plan :
You take a hand picked Conroe that can do much more than stock , let's say something above 3 Ghz and put it on a rig you build to go against an overclocked FX-60 .
But since it's you setup and everything why not just tweak it a little bit . Leave the FX-60 be and even make it seem it has an advantage . Now for the Conroe some special BIOS tweaking would be nice , wouldn't it ? How about something that says the CPU is running at 2.66 Ghz even if it's at over 3 Ghz ? That would be nice , wouldn't it .
And there you go , you have some lovely benchmarks to show the press . They'll be impressed for sure , everyone will talk about it . You'll have some people change their minds , especially in the retail and wait for the awsome Conroe to come out . There goes some of AMD's 80 % .
I want some real stuff here people . Why couldn't Intel do this or something similar . The only one reason I can think of is that the truth will be out in 6 months but that's not a really good one . Conroe is going to be good enough by then even if I doubt it's going to be a monster and people tend to forget in time .
P.S. : Let's not forget the "modified" ATI driver Intel used on both platforms . We all know how well some video drivers can perform if they are tweaked a bit and if they recognize the Conroe for the speed monster it really is :lol: .