3D CAD Card vs Gaming Card

JonnyWicked

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
6
0
18,510
I'm a Mechanical Designer using Autodesk Inventor 10 and I play some games (Diablo2 & Doom 3, not a huge gamer). I'm going to be building a new PC and I want to know whether I should get a strong CAD card to handle both or should I get a strong gaming card to do both I'm looking to spend between $300-$600 in a card. NVidia Quadro FX1400 or a NVidia 7900GTX, or does someone have a better suggestion?
 

michaelahess

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2006
1,711
0
19,780
I third that. The quadro's are only "better" if you need strict opengl compliance, the drivers are optimized for that, where-as the consumer cards are optimized for performance over stability, they still work great though.
 

Pain

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2004
1,126
0
19,280
I'm not an expert on the subject and therefore forget the nitty gritty details off the top of my head. However, having seen this debate on other forums and from reading different information about it [I'm a network engineer for an engineering firm], the experts tend to think that if you are going to be doing intensive 3D rendering then you need a card designed for it.

I will try to find some information on it, but from what I gather, if extremely precise rendering is your bread and butter, and you need precision, then you need a professional card.
 

JonnyWicked

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
6
0
18,510
Thank you to all! I'm in no rush to buy, although I am chomping at the bit to build a new PC! I'm currently running a Intel P3 1GHz, 512MB of RAM (PC133) and a cheap 128MB AGP video card with a 17" CRT!!!!

Problem is that this has to pass the "Budgetary Committee" at home - my wife! It's between a new PC and a new big screen Plasma or LCD TV! How does a guy pick between those!!

Any way, thanks again!
 

MarkG

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2004
841
0
19,010
Traditionally one of the big differences between CAD cards and games cards has been fast antialiased lines: CAD cards support them, game cards don't and have to use FSAA instead. I'm not sure whether that's still the case.
 

Pain

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2004
1,126
0
19,280
I just did a quick search, and you could probably find the same information I will by googling up stuff like "graphics cards for CAD", etc.

From what I have seen, and from what you just posted as your current specs, then you would probably be better served by getting a decent CPU with a lot of memory, and then getting a decent consumer level video card.
 

JonnyWicked

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
6
0
18,510
This is what I was planning on getting when building my PC;
-2GB DDR400 (PC3200) - Crucial
-(2) 250GB Western Digital 7200 rpm SATA (raid 0)
-AMD 64 3700+ (2.2GHz) San Diego
-Promise Fast Track Raid Card
-Abit AMD MoBo (VIA K8T890 chip set)
-19" HP LCD monitor
-LightScribe DualLayer DVD Burner
-DVD ROM
-550W ANTEC Power Supply
-ANTEC Performance Case

All I need is a video card selection!
 

Pain

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2004
1,126
0
19,280
If it were me, based on working as a network enginner, supporting engineering and also married to an architect, this is what I would change:

Stay away from via chipset, they have come a long way, but if you stick with an nvidia chipset you might save yourself a lot of hassles.

Spring for a 20 inch monitor with a 1600x1200 native resulution. You can get a Samsung 20.1 LCD for around $450. Larger LCD monitors however have a slower response time, so keep that in mind. A good quality, large LCD monitor should be fine. For design work the quality of these monitors is worth every penny, but if you do not plan to run it at the native resolution then don't bother.

You don't need a seperate raid card. You can buy boards with decent raid controllers built in. I have used raid in workstations before, and I'm not sure it is worth it. It isn't difficult and you shouldn't have issues, but the speed increase is barely noticable in most cases.
 

thedrake

Distinguished
Feb 2, 2006
68
0
18,630
Let me tell you a story about a man named Jed.
Poor engineer trying to keep his family fed.
Then one day he was trying to wire-frame,
but his graphics card, it could only game.

ATI.....nVIDIA.

Then one day he was posting on a forum
the good gaming boys said buy a gaming card.
He was smarter and chose the correct path.
He gobbled up the Quadro...and never looked back

All goofing aside, I suspect that the people that are telling you that the "consumer/gaming" video card is "just fine" or "will be ok" are off their rockers.....and are not engineers, or have not supported engineers in their career.

If you spend 30-100% of your time doing CAD on that machine, you need to get the Quadro. It has a very very different set of drivers and the hardware is tuned toward design/engineering aps.

The consumer cards by ATI and nVIDIA are tuned towards gaming and that is ALL.

I know from first hand experience on this one. Consumer cards SUCK at things like architecture software packages, wire framing - basically all of the aps out there are are design aps (catia, pro-E, etc...). It was a very painful lesson for me when I realized this. I even contacted ATI 3 years ago when my RAdeon 9700 PRO was new. It was caughing and sputtering on a simple home-design wire frame. It doesn't get much more basic in design/engineering than that. I was told by ATI that their consumer cards (and nVIDIA's for that matter) can't handle it cause they are tuned almost soley for games and simple 2d environments. Fire and Quadro are what is recommended hands down. Very pricey, but definately worth the money.

The bottom line here is that you'd probably be better off with 2 graphics cards and flip them depending on what you are doing. Otherwise you must make a sacrifice on either gaming by going Quadro or on your ME stuff by going consumer grade-gaming card.

Good luck.
 

MarkG

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2004
841
0
19,010
Antialiasing smooths the jagged edges of objects: when displaying wireframe CAD models that's a very good idea so the lines look smooth.

If the hardware supports antialiased lines then it will perform the appropriate calculations and render just the lines to the framebuffer, if it doesn't then it has to render the entire frame antialiased, which can be much slower.
 

FITCamaro

Distinguished
Feb 28, 2006
700
0
18,990
Personally I think if you're not a big gamer then work is more important and you should get the professional level card. It'll still do fine in games but will do better in your work environment. Might not be quite as fast in the games but at 1280x1024 (the highest a 19" LCD will go) you'll be fine. Might wait till a Quadro card comes out based on the 7900 series chip though since it'll have higher clocks due to the 90nm.
 

ivoryjohn

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2001
174
0
18,680
Thank you to all! I'm in no rush to buy, although I am chomping at the bit to build a new PC! I'm currently running a Intel P3 1GHz, 512MB of RAM (PC133) and a cheap 128MB AGP video card with a 17" CRT!!!!

Problem is that this has to pass the "Budgetary Committee" at home - my wife! It's between a new PC and a new big screen Plasma or LCD TV! How does a guy pick between those!!

Any way, thanks again!

I had the same choice, but when I considered how much they would whine about the grey/black bars on the side of the screen when watching standard tv, (or worse, they might stretch it so everyone is short and fat), I chose to build a new pc.
 

Reign_Of_Chaos

Distinguished
Jan 12, 2006
22
0
18,510
http://features.cgsociety.org/story_custom.php?story_id=3321&page=

They test the Quadro FX4500 against the 7800GTX (single and SLI) and the best Ati FireGL card. No game benches but none the less some clips include...

SPECapc for Maya
The FireGL V7100 lagged behind the Quadro FXs for this particular test. The GeForce 7800GTX in single and SLI configuration performed about as well as the Quadro FXs

SPECapc for 3ds Max
Both GeForce 7800GTX running alone or in SLI mode were seriously disadvanced for this 3ds Max test.

CineBench 2003
Surprisingly the GeForce 7800GTX performed as well as the Quadro FX 4500, this probably shows that CineBench results is not affected by the GeForce 7800GTX's lack of workstation-specific features of the Quadro and FireGL boards. Running the GeForce 7800GTX in SLI made little difference to the final result.
But read the whole article, its a mixed bag.
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790
I'm a Mechanical Designer using Autodesk Inventor 10 and I play some games (Diablo2 & Doom 3, not a huge gamer). I'm going to be building a new PC and I want to know whether I should get a strong CAD card to handle both or should I get a strong gaming card to do both I'm looking to spend between $300-$600 in a card. NVidia Quadro FX1400 or a NVidia 7900GTX, or does someone have a better suggestion?



It's a tough trade off. The Quadro is optimized to be more "precise" in placement whereas the 7900GTX is optimized for general frame rate. The Quadro driver is what the difference is but from what I've seen it will be so-so in gaming. I would guess that the Design stuff is the most important so I'd go for the Quadro.
 

chenBrazil

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2006
136
0
18,680
If U spend lot of time redering Cad or Catia models , stick with Quadro solution. I use on my Opteron 240 workstation one Quadro FX500 AGP(based on FX5200 game gpu) and it is faster than my fellow with 6600 GT PCIexpress VGA card. One alternative is to get 6800 Ultra or 7800 GT or GTX VGA cards and activate Quadro functions with Rivaturner, them U will get top VGA Quadro cards paying only a fraction of real value of Quadro cards, as GPU is the same and Riva turner unlock the Quadro features (some VGA cards as MSI ones ) can be found by your system as real Quadro cards after using Rivaturner... Try this and get the best of 2 words ( By the way I unlock one 6800 ultra and it is really fast on Catia... and when I play doom 3 ...is is fantastic !)
 

JonnyWicked

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
6
0
18,510
Thank you for replying!

I have never heard of "Rivaturner". What is it? I tried looking online but everything I see is either in Spanish or French.
 

Pain

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2004
1,126
0
19,280
http://www.guru3d.com/rivatuner/

It's a utility to get into the nuts and bolts of nvidia cards and mess around with the default settings, unlocking locked features, overclocking, etc.

http://www.guru3d.com/rivatuner/softquadro/

Sometimes the disabled features are disabled because they don't work, so they turn them off and sell them as lower models. Sometimes the features work perfectly and they might have needed a batch of lower models, so they just sell them as lower models. It's luck of the draw really. I do not know that much about quantro chips, but for consumer grade chips, as Forest Gump would say, you never know what you're gonna get.
 

chenBrazil

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2006
136
0
18,680
Sure some GPU for games are from rejects from Quadro VGA cards, but as most of GPU market is for gamers , U can be sure that for top VGA cards , GPU are exactly the same as for Quadro VGA cards. Rivaturner will unlock these features (somebrands U cannot see it unlock (as showing in Nvidia pannel , as quadro, but even those U will see the improve in performance when compared to pre rivaturner mode) .
Rivaturner is easy to set up and will not broke any warranty police as U are not oc the Vga card , but unlocking current features with a software.
As U noticed, quadro vga cards do not have an extensive product line, so stick to high end VGA game card to use rivaturner, some GPU will not be turned into quadro,as there are no equivalent quadro. Check the links mentioned by Pain for that.
 

JonnyWicked

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
6
0
18,510
I get around on a PC very well, but I am not experienced when it comes to tweaking BIOS settings, hardware settings, etc. Would you recommend me not dealing with this at all? Or is it pretty straight forward? Also is this reversable if I have problems?

I trying new things out, but spending $500 on a video card and possibly wrecking it to tweak it scares me. My total cost for the PC will be around $2000-$2500. That's roughly 20%-25% of my total cost!
 

Pain

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2004
1,126
0
19,280
It's a software tweak, so it is reversible. Read that site I gave you and also google up rivatuner and look for tutorials on using it, perhaps specifically for enabling quantro features. I'm sure you will find something about it.

Like I said though, sometimes it will work as you expect [hope] and somethings it will not. As chen said, if you buy a top end game card, chances are good that it's one of the better quality chips and therefore the extra features will work fine...but, it might not. I do not, as I said, know much (anything) about quantro chips so I don't know what features are available that aren't there on game cards. Perhaps those features are software only and require no hardware to function, and rivatuner will just enable that feature. If that is the case, you are safe. If it is not the case and it requires extra hardware that is disabled, then you aren't sure that hardware functions until you try it.

One older article I found:

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/72
 

chenBrazil

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2006
136
0
18,680
Most of quadro features depends on softwares, as hardware features are present on both Gaming and Quadro cards (same PCB project), but Nvidia just lock the features as Professional VGA cards market are more profitable per unit . Nvidia used to use hardware lock in 5900 series VGA card , but with 6... family GPU the hardware lock were not instaled , using drivers to lock it up, rivaturner will skip the VGA id to unlock quadro features. So as I mentioned I use 6800 Ultra MSI vga as Quadro, as Pain mentioned, must test the VGA as some really may not be unlocked . Maybe the best way for U is get one from Ebay (and probably will be older batch , and more chance to respect Nvidia project layout). But I can tell U somenthing (I have 3 unlocked Quadro, 2 running Sli) it worths the try as U can check to FX3450 prices (at least in Brazil , quadro prices are at least 5 times over regular vga cards if product available) I bought 3 Vga and all are working as quadro, more, 2 6600 GT , 2 6800 from EVGA , were also turned into quadro for my fellows so chances are good , or get a smaller quadro model as fx 540 or fx 1100 (but it really depends on your needs, as in my office I have one engineer modeling on Catia , car parts for MB , volkswagen etc so in my case , better vga really makes diference ( our Quadro FX500 workstation is just for checking project... running models ...well we choose the 165 station...)
 

lindochico

Distinguished
Jan 2, 2006
35
0
18,530
Hey! I was reading this interesting post and got really curious: Are you saying that you can also unlock the 6600 GT to make it work like a Quadro?

I have a XFX 6600 GT (AGP) with me, is it possible to unlock it and make it work like a Quadro? If so, what software can I use to notice the difference? By using the method shown on hardwaresecrets.com I could do this and have the best of both worlds, right? Is there any side-effects?

Thank you so much for sharing this info. :wink: