Ok guys, i have been going threw forums for months now and have finally decided on a computer.
i would like to kno if this computer is a gaming beast and if there is anything i should change to make it better. i will NOT be overclocking at all so i need to pick good stock parts.
That is a sweet pc.... to cheapen the setup, go for the 4200+ X2 instead of the 4400+, that should cut the price a lot. Ummm... the soundcard is amazing stuff, but if you really want to make things cheaper, i would recommend you an Audigy 4, not as good, but good enough to sweeten the gaming experience and anything to do with audio. Apart from that... go for it!
go with the opteron 165 rather than the x2. Better performance and better overclock later if you decide. I would also go with x1900xt. I mean it is a fantastic card that hasn't been completely tromped by nividia yet. It is way good to me. Plus it is like 200 bucks cheaper! Anyhow, other than that it looks good.
go with the opteron 165 rather than the x2. Better performance and better overclock later if you decide. I would also go with x1900xt. I mean it is a fantastic card that hasn't been completely tromped by nividia yet. It is way good to me. Plus it is like 200 bucks cheaper! Anyhow, other than that it looks good.
A 165 will not out perform a 4400+. He said no overclocking.
there is no need to change the RAM, i will not be overclocking at all. so no need for fast ram. now as for the Motherboard, is this a good choice? if you can find a better one one www.ncix.com please give me a link so i can look into it. please keep it around the same price level ($120 canadian) and i would prefer non SLI.
there is no need to change the RAM, i will not be overclocking at all. so no need for fast ram. now as for the Motherboard, is this a good choice? if you can find a better one one www.ncix.com please give me a link so i can look into it. please keep it around the same price level ($120 canadian) and i would prefer non SLI.
I thought you wanted it to be a...
Quote :
gaming beast
If so, go with some better RAM with tighter timings. You can find some for just as cheap or perhaps cheaper than that 211 dollars you are spending on the Value-RAM.
thx for links, if you think that this one is better however, i will stick with it. But i dont really like the colour. but that doesent really matter. now as for RAM since im not overclocking getting CL2 ram would not have ANY impact on games. so theres no reason to spend more money on RAM when i dont really have to. am i correct?
It looks good, but for now, just about all games only utilize one core, so unless your going to do some multitasking, you could save some cash by just buying a single core AMD processor.
You are wrong. 2-2-2-5 is best. 2-3-2-5 is realy good. 2-3-3-7 is good.
Quote :
...yes, best for... OVERCLOCKING. i will NOT be overclocking so i have no need for the Best and most Expensive RAM.
I'm sorry, I didn't see the word OVERCLOCKING anywhere in Conroe's statement... did you put it in there between the lines Conroe? I must be going blind...
The point is 2-2-2-5 are some of the best timings PERIOD. Not just for overclocking. But anyways... if you want to stick to your Value-RAM, go right ahead, even though you can get much better RAM with lower latencies for pretty much the same price. Low latency DDR400 Dual Channel 2GB kits are nearly as expensive as they were a year ago.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.