Does the Catalyst stickey need to go?

Do you think the Catalyst driver stickey needs unstuck?

  • Yes, make it back to a normal thread

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • No, delete the blasted thing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, leave it as-is.

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • No. Give the author 30 days to change, then ditch it.

    Votes: 3 50.0%

  • Total voters
    6

bourgeoisdude

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2005
1,240
25
19,320
So...this catalyst driver stickey has sat here unchanged since I joine TGForumz with very few visits.

Does it need to be "unstickeyed" back to a normal thread? Should it be deleted? Left as-is? Or should it have a 30 day grace period?
 

bourgeoisdude

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2005
1,240
25
19,320
Fair enough. Why is it stickeyed if it isn't being viewed much though? Who decides when it is unstickeyed anyway?

I have nothing against it, I only think it needs to stay updated to remain a stickey IMO. Maybe mentioning the Catalyst 5 series drivers perhaps?
 

GeneticWeapon

Splendid
Jan 13, 2003
5,795
0
25,780
The author was using a 9600Pro for the benchmarks/comparisons, and these days, it's not the top choice card to be doing such a thing. He know's it :wink:
I'm sure he'll decide it's future soon enough.

The sticky that I have is outdated also, and an update/total rewrite is pending.

There has been a recent discussion thread about all this.
 

bourgeoisdude

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2005
1,240
25
19,320
The author was using a 9600Pro for the benchmarks/comparisons, and these days, it's not the top choice card to be doing such a thing. He know's it :wink:
I'm sure he'll decide it's future soon enough.

The sticky that I have is outdated also, and an update/total rewrite is pending.

There has been a recent discussion thread about all this.

I missed that discussion. Where is it?