I havent read that article but how come I think it will position the FX-60 as the clear and indisputable owner 4 lyphe and claim that the EE is only worth 15 bucks?

Reply to Ycon

TechReport proves a lot of biasness. AT review, 3dsmax7.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] i=2725&p=6
or xbit
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/c [...] 65_10.html
Now what we care more is about final rendering. Xbit made a clear point. Intel is better.
True or not some of those tests are carefully selected.
I think that i'd rather have more trust in IDF benchmarks than in those biased AMD robots.

Reply to CompGeek

Quote :

And the Thunder Rolls...or in this case, the Fanboy Spouts...o.O

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

Reply to MadModMike

I actually found this specific Tech Report article to be more restrained in terms of their Intel criticism then some of their other ones. They did take time to give a nod to the power consumption being finally competitive with the FX60 and to the 965EE's overclocking potential which is what people buying that processor would want anyways.

They're probably covering their backs in case Conroe turns out to perform as advertised.

Certainly this statement isn't AMD biased:

Quote :

Given what Intel's 65nm fab process has been able to do for the Extreme Edition 965, AMD may have one heck of a fight on its hands if the upcoming Core microarchitecture is anywhere near reasonably competent.

Seems Intel only needs to be "reasonably competent" now to be competitive.

Reply to ltcommander_data

So " Wankman" were you born a c**t, or did you evolve into one.

Reply to attkell

That's a great first post. :roll:

Reply to Action_Man

yeah, its not pretty but about as informative as the last twenty or so I've read from you.

Reply to attkell

Mmm, just like your two. :roll: Did you sign up just to have a go at me? Go back to lurking or whatever you used to do.

Reply to Action_Man

Yeah, you got me! I will go back to where I came from. :lol:

Reply to attkell

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > TECH REPORT's REVIEW OF THE 965 EE

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 1268 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.322 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Focus On

TECH REPORT's REVIEW OF THE 965 EE

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - TECH REPORT's REVIEW OF THE 965 EE

Please mind