Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD SET TO OFFER ENERGY EFFICIENT PROCESSORS

AMD SET TO OFFER ENERGY EFFICIENT PROCESSORS

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - AMD SET TO OFFER ENERGY EFFICIENT PROCESSORS

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
9-inch   03-24-2006 at 07:54:58 AM

So says XbitLabs:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060322212457.html

Quote :

The Energy Efficient family of dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors will include Athlon 64 X2 3800+ with 35W TDP, which will remain single dual-core offering with such a low power consumption till Q2 2007, as well as models 3800+, 4000+, 4200+, 4400+ and 4600+ with thermal guideline of 65W. In Q3 2006 AMD is expected to introduce the model 4800+, which is expected to remain the top energy efficient offering till the Q2 2007, with similar thermal specs. Depending on the speed bin, the dual-core desktop chips from AMD now have 110W or 89W TDP. Typical dual-core chips for socket AM2 will have TDP of 89W.




Really impressive. :D

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Action_Man   03-24-2006 at 07:55:33 AM
- 0 +

You getting a new keyboard would be impressive.

Reply to Action_Man
apache_lives   03-24-2006 at 08:08:44 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

So says XbitLabs:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060322212457.html

The Energy Efficient family of dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors will include Athlon 64 X2 3800+ with 35W TDP, which will remain single dual-core offering with such a low power consumption till Q2 2007, as well as models 3800+, 4000+, 4200+, 4400+ and 4600+ with thermal guideline of 65W. In Q3 2006 AMD is expected to introduce the model 4800+, which is expected to remain the top energy efficient offering till the Q2 2007, with similar thermal specs. Depending on the speed bin, the dual-core desktop chips from AMD now have 110W or 89W TDP. Typical dual-core chips for socket AM2 will have TDP of 89W.




Really impressive. :D

why do i suspect the energy efficent processors are cut down cores?

not to be a fanboy (but you must add it since you yourself did for AMD) - conroe = 65w for there dual cores and that took on AMDs chip which is 110w - 120w, whats "impressive"? and yonah already did it and clock for clock months ago, theres nothing "impressive" apart from Intel's Pentium M / P6 tech.

Reply to apache_lives
Action_Man   03-24-2006 at 08:15:16 AM
- 0 +

AMD never offered energy efficient processors before? :wink:

Reply to Action_Man
gOJDO   03-24-2006 at 08:25:25 AM
- 0 +

The 35W 3800+ is a kind of impression, but the rest is not impressive. I would like to see some K8 overperforming Core with less power, than we can say that something is impressive. Until than, stop spiting marketing around, AM2 will sux a lot as the things seems now.

Reply to gOJDO
gOJDO   03-24-2006 at 10:08:31 AM
- 0 +

I will donate a new keyboard, but bith the CAPS and SHIFT keys destoryed. I have Logitec Elite unpacked and I have no use from it, where to send?

Reply to gOJDO
RichPLS   03-24-2006 at 10:24:18 PM
- 0 +

Still, AMD’s new Athlon 64 FX-62 processor is expected to have 125W wattage whereas Extreme Edition of Conroe, also targeted at gamers, will have typical heat dissipation of 95W.

Reply to RichPLS
mpasternak   03-24-2006 at 10:41:11 PM
- 0 +

for my gaming. i don't give a flaming fuck difference between 65w and 55w. that 10 watts aint going to be a HUGE factor

I'm just glad that intel and amd aren't giving us more heater cores like the presshot.

damn, cold winter day... computer on full tilt.. my room will warm up in no time

Reply to mpasternak
apache_lives   03-25-2006 at 12:06:43 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

Still, AMD’s new Athlon 64 FX-62 processor is expected to have 125W wattage whereas Extreme Edition of Conroe, also targeted at gamers, will have typical heat dissipation of 95W.



Its a good sign - Intel is back to were they were before the P4 :D

What speed was that 95w slated for? 2.93ghz?



Whats happening with AMD - are they still stuck with 90nm till the end of the year?

Reply to apache_lives
pip_seeker   03-25-2006 at 12:43:11 AM
- 0 +

Quote :


Its a good sign - Intel is back to were they were before the P4 :D




Now that is a foward looking statement if I ever saw one.

Your mommy must have told you to count your chickens before they hatch. :roll:

Reply to pip_seeker
rettihSlluB   03-25-2006 at 03:04:49 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

You getting a new keyboard would be impressive



Your mom does a lot of cash in one night. Some call her "The blow job guru". She'll get one for him soon. Don't panic.

P.S: She looks really disgusting in those red stockings. Well, what else can you expect from a whore! 8)

Reply to rettihSlluB
Action_Man   03-25-2006 at 03:06:38 AM
- 0 +

Get some new material fanboy.

Reply to Action_Man
gpfear   03-25-2006 at 03:46:48 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

Get some new material fanboy.




Even Action Man is right sometimes. Check the experation date on the mother jokes.

Reply to gpfear
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD SET TO OFFER ENERGY EFFICIENT PROCESSORS
Go to:

There are 1227 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.592 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them