Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » General Homebuilt » low 3d mark scores on new system?
 

low 3d mark scores on new system?

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : low 3d mark scores on new system?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I just ran 3d mark 2006 on the system in my sig. except only using one of the 7900 gt cards, I got a 4679 using the basic edition and default settings. Does that seem low? As far as drivers and stuff I've only installed the latest motherboard drivers from nvidias site (smbus and ethernet, not ide or nv firewall/active armor)and the latest graphics card drivers. Anyone have some ideas on things I could check?

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

That is not low.
3dmark 06 is very demanding.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Hrm ok... maybe people were running earlier versions of 3dmark or something? Could swear I saw someone posting that they got 9000 something on a similar system.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

yeah.
Get your self one of 05,04,03 and try:)
In 05 you will probably hit 9000 or more.

ppl say that futuremark is far beyond his time.

Now is time for you to do some overclocking for a greater score.

And we all do that:) Even when sleeping :oops:

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Quote :

I just ran 3d mark 2006 on the system in my sig. except only using one of the 7900 gt cards, I got a 4679 using the basic edition and default settings. Does that seem low? As far as drivers and stuff I've only installed the latest motherboard drivers from nvidias site (smbus and ethernet, not ide or nv firewall/active armor)and the latest graphics card drivers. Anyone have some ideas on things I could check?



The best comparison is game for game.

Two thirds of the 3DMark scores are extreme overclocks, that yes, while they do 'pass' the test and generate a score... the test was just garbled 3D images, and hypercolour textures, with registry hacks to lower texture (and possibly 'new' FSAA pattern) quality so low the whole polygon is just one blur of colour.

Until they build an artifact tester into 3DMark, it will be less useful for comparisons using the Online Result Browser.

Even now websites only use it for 'system to system' comparisons and do not use the results in ORB.

Is the system slow in the games you play ?, or do people these days have a 3DMark 05/06 server they join so they can sit around 'benchmarking' [cough Futuremark cough] while not engaging in tactical combat ? :P

It is for these reasons Futuremark has shamed ORB, while 'MadOnion' tried to make it something useful.

Profile: stranger
More Information

The system runs great so far... sometimes when the hard drive is being heavily accessed it lags up but that's all I've noticed so far. Thanks for the info on 3d mark though, I was giving it too much credit.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hmmm.... I recently put together a system that is oddly very similar to that.

ASUS A8N-SLI Premium
Opteron 165 (OC to 2.5)
2 gigs GSkill Extreme series ram (Same as I got)
Raptor drive. (one difference)
XFX 7900 GT Extreme (520 Mhz) Same cared, but only running one.

And 3dmark06 came out to be around 5100.

So if you are running duel 7900 GT cards, i would think you would score higher....

/shrug, hard to believe the chip OC made more difference then running two video cards in SLI

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

see sig for 05


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » General Homebuilt » low 3d mark scores on new system?
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Apple Tops In Technical Support

Published on May 07, 2008

Cupertino (CA) - Apple in number one in technical support, according to the Consumer Reports magazine. Read more

AMD claims Opteron based Crays lead HPC market

Published on June 16, 2005

AMD said two Cray supercomputers using Opterons lead the market on HPC Challenge benchmarketing tests. Read more

Patch 3.5.0 for 3DMark03 released

Published on November 16, 2004

Futuremark released a new patch for the 3DMark03 benchmark suite. Read more

Intel Pitches Visual Computing Power, Platform Power Savings

Published on June 11, 2008

Santa Clara (CA) - Intel is hosting its traditional Research Day event for analysts and journalists today, giving an insight in current research projects underway at the company. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky - Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more