Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

recompare the two....

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • Water Cooling
  • AMD
  • Processors
Last response: in CPUs
Share
March 26, 2006 5:50:14 AM

let's recompare the two companie's processor...

FX-60 at 2.8ghz

955 at 3.45ghz

The FX-60 needs watercooling just to break 3ghz.

THe 955 can get 4.7ghz on air, break 5ghz with water, and be stable at 6ghz with vapochill.

Needless to say, at 6ghz the 955 easily powns the fx-60, therefore the crown should be given to the 955, not the fx-60. AMD has made a mistake in releasing the FX-60 as it is not overclockable at all. When Conroe EE comes and rocks all AMD procs, AMD will not be able to fight back cuz their M2 doesn't improve performance but only increase cost in getting a new platform. I think all the review sites favor AMD too much and they need to wake up to the facts and starting list the 955 and Intel as the king. AMD made a good run but they are going downhill now so all you AMD owners should think about selling your stuff now before it is too late.

All Intel owners, be proud of your processors and be confident in that you made a good choice in buying a very very very upgradable platform. The 65nm will completely solve your heat problem cuz i hear the conroe's will idle at 20C!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO INTEL, SMOKE AMD

More about : recompare

March 26, 2006 6:35:42 AM

You sir are a fanboy blinded POS!

Take your fanboyism and go post else where.

oh yea go get someone to help give you a reailty check, because your one track mind slobering at the heels of a company that don't care about you they just want your money..IDIOT!!!
March 26, 2006 6:36:27 AM

I will say this the dumbest people are fanboys. That both Amd and intel fanboys. So go back to your fanboy world and leave the site for people who like to talk about computers.

Like what you are doing acting like a 6 year old going my brother can beat up your brother. Oh well children will act like children.
Related resources
March 26, 2006 9:11:10 AM

:idea: Please learn to support your arguements with research and facts. Until then, be quiet.
March 26, 2006 9:45:24 AM

I only agree to a point, that is if the highest frequency was the objective. Intel would have the crown.

Performance wise, I'd have to disagree. The crown would be AMDs.

The benchmarks speak for themselves.
March 26, 2006 10:24:28 AM

Well, Intel can go high GHz, but AMD can go High performance witch Intel can't.
March 26, 2006 10:32:31 AM

I think you're the one who needs to vapochill. They're just computer processors for crying out loud!
March 26, 2006 11:39:35 AM

It is true and i read about this in quite a few sites but providing the link would give more credibility.
Intel clock= 1.60 x AMD clock
so for a 3 ghz you would need a 4.8ghz P4
for a 3.4 ghz you would need a 5.44 ghz P4
beyond 3.4 the FX is hardly stable.

Intel EE on 65 have a good reputation when OCing with the right coolers.
Just for proof on Intel's side
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,2800.html
March 26, 2006 12:11:42 PM

Ok another geeky little fanboy who had to change his name to make this post.
First of all, I must address your name. In case you dont know, AMD has owned Intel for nearly 3 years now.
Secondly your comparing a 90nm manufacturing process to a 65nm process. Thats like comparing a 2006 cobra mustang with a 1992 mustang gt.
Next you'll be comparing Conroe to the FX60. Makes no sense whatsoever.
Lets not forget you can reach FX60 speeds with a $300 Opteron 165 at 1.8ghz. Too bad the 955 is $700.
March 26, 2006 12:34:36 PM

So? I am comparing what currently exists. 90nm or 65nm it doesn't matter. Untill AMD will shrink its cores Intel will be replacing 65 with 45 nm. It's an Intel advantage. This discousion isn't technology wise but performance wise.

And this thread isn't about opterons,but about FX 60 against 955.
And keep dreaming about AMD owning Intel for 3 years. Believe me i wouldn't change a Northwood to a XP even if it hit me in the face. XP was always a cheaper alternative nothing more. Is this how AMD dominated Intel? And AMD did not have the performance crown back then and it ran hotter. I care about performance not about clock per clock and Northwood was ten times better than XP. Things turned after the prescott launch but still,3 years is a crass exageration.

Who's the bigger brand fan? I who give facts or you who posts opinions and things that are off topic.
March 26, 2006 12:45:50 PM

2.5 years then... :roll:

And just for historical accuracy, the Athlon was better until the P4b came out and about equal from then on until the P4 c (Northwood.).

As for heat, that was also solved with some revision or another.

It's always been an up/down kind of game.
March 26, 2006 12:59:19 PM

A Pinto running at 200 mph is still a Pinto.
March 26, 2006 1:19:19 PM

Yeah, and a decent 4 to 6 issue processor (per core, with multiple cores) clocked at apx 2.8 GHz, doing between 4 and 8 instructions per clock cycle will kick both their asses, regardless of who makes it.

Ohhh, while using about half the power too. Thus putting out far less heat. Possibly with just advanced passive cooling it could be stable. Thus no energy required for cooling.

Man I've read some dribble here recently, anyone else notice the quality of the forums is going sour ?
March 26, 2006 1:35:54 PM

That's if you don't take into consideration multitasking for example were Intel bashed AMD. Overall,Intel was better,not by a long shot but still a considerable margin.
March 26, 2006 2:12:00 PM

@ Tabris:

Your just now noticing this? :lol: 

I really do hope the moderators become a little more aggresive in here.
March 26, 2006 2:19:41 PM

I think you should always compare at stock, anything over that is not a given. Sure use the best you can on both systems but saying a vaporcill is pushing it. Of all the OCers like .5% are going to use that and most aren't going to hit that speed. If you can say that this is a give me speed on any of the cpu's it's fair but they haven't been on the streets long enough to find that point yet.
I'm really sick of all this conroe junk, i think it will beat the AMD's. But who has one and what is AMD going to have at that piont. AMD is moving to 65nm ,ddr2 and after the benches I'm sure thier tweeking the cores like crazy. I think it'll be like the gpu wars in the next few years with the up and down for each.
Who's the best for what you want to do at the price you can pay and can you get it today.
I most say I'm a AMD,ATI fan but I will buy the best I gan get at the time I can get it.
March 26, 2006 2:48:34 PM

Wow, fanboizm...Shure you can get high GHz on Intel's heat machines, but think about it. with the onchip memory controller, 64 bit support, and being EXTREMLY stable when overclock to max, not to mention the sweet chip coming out soon, I would say AMD is in the lead.

About the AM2 performance. AMD is making their cores super-charged, and who knows, mabey a K10 will be released soon with 8 cores and 10Ghz speed, combined with onchip memory controller and DDR2 it would run circles around ANY Intel chip, even Conroe, or mabey AM2 will be a huge flop and Intel will form a Monopoly with Conroe and the corts will make Intel keep AMD affloat.

Also the highest I've seen on the 955 with Vapochill is 5.52.

O, and look at these benchmark comparisons.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1...
Please put facts to back up a claim thank you
March 26, 2006 2:57:46 PM

Quote:
let's recompare the two companie's processor...

FX-60 at 2.8ghz

955 at 3.45ghz

The FX-60 needs watercooling just to break 3ghz.

THe 955 can get 4.7ghz on air, break 5ghz with water, and be stable at 6ghz with vapochill.

Needless to say, at 6ghz the 955 easily powns the fx-60, therefore the crown should be given to the 955, not the fx-60. AMD has made a mistake in releasing the FX-60 as it is not overclockable at all. When Conroe EE comes and rocks all AMD procs, AMD will not be able to fight back cuz their M2 doesn't improve performance but only increase cost in getting a new platform. I think all the review sites favor AMD too much and they need to wake up to the facts and starting list the 955 and Intel as the king. AMD made a good run but they are going downhill now so all you AMD owners should think about selling your stuff now before it is too late.

All Intel owners, be proud of your processors and be confident in that you made a good choice in buying a very very very upgradable platform. The 65nm will completely solve your heat problem cuz i hear the conroe's will idle at 20C!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO INTEL, SMOKE AMD



What a ridiculous thread. Threads like this are flushing our forums down the toilet and I dont mean a wussie low flow toilet either.
March 27, 2006 12:06:24 AM

Quote:
let's recompare the two companie's processor...

FX-60 at 2.8ghz

955 at 3.45ghz

The FX-60 needs watercooling just to break 3ghz.

THe 955 can get 4.7ghz on air, break 5ghz with water, and be stable at 6ghz with vapochill.

Needless to say, at 6ghz the 955 easily powns the fx-60, therefore the crown should be given to the 955, not the fx-60. AMD has made a mistake in releasing the FX-60 as it is not overclockable at all. When Conroe EE comes and rocks all AMD procs, AMD will not be able to fight back cuz their M2 doesn't improve performance but only increase cost in getting a new platform. I think all the review sites favor AMD too much and they need to wake up to the facts and starting list the 955 and Intel as the king. AMD made a good run but they are going downhill now so all you AMD owners should think about selling your stuff now before it is too late.

All Intel owners, be proud of your processors and be confident in that you made a good choice in buying a very very very upgradable platform. The 65nm will completely solve your heat problem cuz i hear the conroe's will idle at 20C!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO INTEL, SMOKE AMD


First of all: you're retarded. You cannot say that, because the 955 runs at 4.7 GHz on air, it is better than the FX-60. You have to look at performance too. Also, I think that review sites, who test and rate products, have a better idea about which processor is better than your small mind does. Dummy. :evil: 

Second of all: quit posting crap.

Quote:
companie's
:arrow:
Learn how to spell...
March 27, 2006 12:09:38 AM

Quote:
I think you're the one who needs to vapochill. They're just computer processors for crying out loud!


Lol. It's the truth.
March 27, 2006 12:47:14 AM

That's bull; my friend owns a 955EE and a 800$ Vapochill system and can't break 5GHz on his 975X Intel board.
March 27, 2006 12:53:51 AM

Quote:
Yeah, and a decent 4 to 6 issue processor (per core, with multiple cores) clocked at apx 2.8 GHz, doing between 4 and 8 instructions per clock cycle will kick both their asses, regardless of who makes it.

Ohhh, while using about half the power too. Thus putting out far less heat. Possibly with just advanced passive cooling it could be stable. Thus no energy required for cooling.

Man I've read some dribble here recently, anyone else notice the quality of the forums is going sour ?
Ive been reading Toms for about three years, and Ive noticed that everytime AMD or Intel announces a new product LINE, out come the fanboys from their shi7holes and start raising hell. Its to be expected.
March 27, 2006 12:54:22 AM

Quote:
let's recompare the two companie's processor...

FX-60 at 2.8ghz

955 at 3.45ghz

The FX-60 needs watercooling just to break 3ghz.

THe 955 can get 4.7ghz on air, break 5ghz with water, and be stable at 6ghz with vapochill.

Needless to say, at 6ghz the 955 easily powns the fx-60, therefore the crown should be given to the 955, not the fx-60. AMD has made a mistake in releasing the FX-60 as it is not overclockable at all. When Conroe EE comes and rocks all AMD procs, AMD will not be able to fight back cuz their M2 doesn't improve performance but only increase cost in getting a new platform. I think all the review sites favor AMD too much and they need to wake up to the facts and starting list the 955 and Intel as the king. AMD made a good run but they are going downhill now so all you AMD owners should think about selling your stuff now before it is too late.

All Intel owners, be proud of your processors and be confident in that you made a good choice in buying a very very very upgradable platform. The 65nm will completely solve your heat problem cuz i hear the conroe's will idle at 20C!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO INTEL, SMOKE AMD


http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58...

And that's with a Clawhammer :roll:

EDIT: Here's another nice article: http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/06/27/news_6128182.ht...

"How fast is fast? At a recent gathering of PC game enthusiasts, many liquid-cooled systems were able to push a standard Athlon FX-55 2.6GHz processor to speeds close to 5GHz."

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
March 27, 2006 1:05:19 AM

Your statements are completely false.

I challenge you to provide proof!

Where is the proof?
March 27, 2006 1:19:41 AM

*sigh* another fanboy thread......the forum should have a "Fanboyism section" so both Intel and AMD fans talk crap about each other's processors.....

Quote:
Ive been reading Toms for about three years, and Ive noticed that everytime AMD or Intel announces a new product LINE, out come the fanboys from their shi7holes and start raising hell. Its to be expected.


So true xD, I've been around for a small period of time, but I witnessed the 5H17570RM that Conroe made here......

Wait til the products hit the streets.......that's all I say, talking bout papers is really cute and stuff, but until you dont have that piece on your hands and MELT/FRY IT don't talk about it ^^
March 27, 2006 1:22:56 AM

1.4 GHz (Applebred): cpulloverclock - 3031.14MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=40070
1.8 GHz (Applebred): fr@me&Xupyp1 - 2881 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=73482
1700+ (Toro): Misteroadster - 3227 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=44359
1800+ (Toro): boblemagnifique - 3234.8 MHz http://www.membres.lycos.fr/boblemag...00/3235MHz.png
2500+ (Barton): NewBeetle - 3578.4MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
2600+ (Barton): pietro - 3466.3MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
2800+ (Clawhammer): setyotomo & ilyas - 3204.14 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=18206
3000+ (Barton): Memesama - 3613.96MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/vi...=pjpeg&which=i
3000+ (Venice 754): amazetestlab - 3090.28MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=65486
3000+ (Oakville): firefly - 2700.13MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=65488
3000+ (NewCastle): Ssilencer - 3276.60 MHz http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/4638/32765gm.gif
3000+ (ClawHammer): fr@me - 3156 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=65931
3000+ (Winchester): easypanic - 3412.61 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=15933
3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3644.18 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=41857
3200+ (NewCastle): .::Maddog::. & mosin_nagant - 3024MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=22563
3200+ (Manchester): ryba - 3405.67 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=58776
3200+ (Winchester): NewBeetle - 3463 MHz http://cal930.sakura.ne.jp/cgi-bin/c...le/3463MHz.gif
3200+ (Venice): s7e9h3n - 3723.6MHz - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...8&postcount=12
3400+ (ClawHammer): eshbach & Evil Spork - 3320.71 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=12416
3400+ (NewCastle): Jrocket - 3359.59 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=18225
3400+ (Venice): damarble - 2850.66 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=67088
3500+ (Manchester): Willis - 3205.02 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=79721
3500+ (ClawHammer):o jdr2001 & Silence - 3521.6 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=49904
3500+ (NewCastle): |RickY| - 3604.0 MHz http://www.teampuss.com/forums/files/3500caa2c_234.jpg
3500+ (Winchester): Boogotop - 3271,70 MHz http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/data.php...tel_or_amd=amd
3500+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3571.42 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=46575
3500+ (SanDiego):
3700+ (ClawHammer): twillius_basic - 3331.38 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=16530
3700+ (Newark): (Newark): twillius - 3577.35 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=25406
3700+ (SanDiego): Misteroadster - 3704.71 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=38280
3800+ (Venice): PC Ice - 3878.05 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=10699
3800+ (Toledo): destro404 - 3104.89MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=72168
3800+ (NewCastle): Shamino - 3201MHz http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/data.php...tel_or_amd=amd
4000+ (Newark): metalman2785 - 3331. 1MHz http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=702
4000+ (SanDiego): El Snorro - 3750.83 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=76885
4000+ (ClawHammer): gubben - 3614.77 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=25221
FX-53 (ClawHammer): |RickY| & Pedro Rocha - 3602.8 MHz http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
FX-55 (San Diego): Shamino - 4026.33 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=24489
FX-55 (ClawHammer): |RickY|&Pedro Rocha - 4005.23 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=10680
FX-57: MemoryExtremeTeam - 4101.98 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=56028
FX-60: mikeguava - 3868.82MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75052
X2 3800+: Hoschi - 3602.6MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=62810
X2 4200+: sson74 - 3557.12 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=80775
X2 4400+: Fosco - 3408.27 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=62072
X2 4600+: Onepagebook - 3687.15 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78999
X2 4800+: MikeGuava - 3560MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=72471
Opteron 144 (Venus): Overcrash - 3657.8 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=75334
Opteron 146 (Venus): MOSO - 3813 Mhz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=70263
Opteron 148 (Venus): Daniel - 3787.85 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=47280
Opteron 150 (Venus): Predator - 3600.9MHz - http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/799...0m373006ax.jpg
Opteron 154 (Venus): s7e9h3n - 4005.19MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=70094
Opteron 165 (Toledo): Nephilim - 3454.8 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=78027
Opteron 170 (Toledo): Absolute_0 - 3473.7 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=74927
Opteron 175 (Toledo): ixtapalapaquetl - 3420.73 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=80573
Opteron 180 (Toledo): cupra - 3450.99 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=76888
Turion MT-30 (Lancaster: Badong - 3000 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=81677
Turion MT-40 (Lancaster): ryan.crest - 2935.4 MHz http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1141651189
Sempron 2800+ (Paris): turez - 2498.25 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=38643
Sempron Mobile 3000+ : hs - 2972.41 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=69610
Sempron64 2500+ (Palermo): JunQiang - 3003.86 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75385
Sempron64 2600+ (Palermo): pawell262 - 3220.99 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=67685
Sempron64 2800+ (Palermo): fr@me - 3287.69 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=55087
Sempron64 3000+ (Palermo): fr@me - 3133.20 MHz http://overclockers.ru/cpubase/?action=details&id=12402
Sempron64 3000+ (Winchester): TiN_EOF - 3031.20 Mhz http://www.topmods.net/tin/3031.png
Sempron64 3000+ (Palermo): pr1nce - 3208.18 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=75376
Sempron64 3100+ (Palermo): STEELBALLZ/MARTAKIS - 3144.31 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75165
Sempron64 3200+: AeGis - 3065.32 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78404
Sempron64 3300+ (Palermo): XFXGeforced - 2843.9 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78287
Sempron64 3400+: fr@me - 2928.95 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=66864

:roll: so much for your's and others theories :roll:

http://img160.echo.cx/img160/9310/104112ht.jpg - Damn, I was hoping to break 10GB/s first w/ DDR1 :( 

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
April 11, 2006 11:53:45 PM

u guys notice after the thread started started the thread he didnt post anymore

also wanna add hes a dumbass
April 12, 2006 10:42:36 AM

Quote:
1.4 GHz (Applebred): cpulloverclock - 3031.14MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=40070
1.8 GHz (Applebred): fr@me&Xupyp1 - 2881 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=73482
1700+ (Toro): Misteroadster - 3227 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=44359
1800+ (Toro): boblemagnifique - 3234.8 MHz http://www.membres.lycos.fr/boblemag...00/3235MHz.png
2500+ (Barton): NewBeetle - 3578.4MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
2600+ (Barton): pietro - 3466.3MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
2800+ (Clawhammer): setyotomo & ilyas - 3204.14 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=18206
3000+ (Barton): Memesama - 3613.96MHz - http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/vi...=pjpeg&which=i
3000+ (Venice 754): amazetestlab - 3090.28MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=65486
3000+ (Oakville): firefly - 2700.13MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=65488
3000+ (NewCastle): Ssilencer - 3276.60 MHz http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/4638/32765gm.gif
3000+ (ClawHammer): fr@me - 3156 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=65931
3000+ (Winchester): easypanic - 3412.61 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=15933
3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3644.18 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=41857
3200+ (NewCastle): .::Maddog::. & mosin_nagant - 3024MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=22563
3200+ (Manchester): ryba - 3405.67 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=58776
3200+ (Winchester): NewBeetle - 3463 MHz http://cal930.sakura.ne.jp/cgi-bin/c...le/3463MHz.gif
3200+ (Venice): s7e9h3n - 3723.6MHz - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...8&postcount=12
3400+ (ClawHammer): eshbach & Evil Spork - 3320.71 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=12416
3400+ (NewCastle): Jrocket - 3359.59 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=18225
3400+ (Venice): damarble - 2850.66 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=67088
3500+ (Manchester): Willis - 3205.02 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=79721
3500+ (ClawHammer):o jdr2001 & Silence - 3521.6 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=49904
3500+ (NewCastle): |RickY| - 3604.0 MHz http://www.teampuss.com/forums/files/3500caa2c_234.jpg
3500+ (Winchester): Boogotop - 3271,70 MHz http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/data.php...tel_or_amd=amd
3500+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3571.42 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=46575
3500+ (SanDiego):
3700+ (ClawHammer): twillius_basic - 3331.38 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=16530
3700+ (Newark): (Newark): twillius - 3577.35 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=25406
3700+ (SanDiego): Misteroadster - 3704.71 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=38280
3800+ (Venice): PC Ice - 3878.05 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=10699
3800+ (Toledo): destro404 - 3104.89MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=72168
3800+ (NewCastle): Shamino - 3201MHz http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/data.php...tel_or_amd=amd
4000+ (Newark): metalman2785 - 3331. 1MHz http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=702
4000+ (SanDiego): El Snorro - 3750.83 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=76885
4000+ (ClawHammer): gubben - 3614.77 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=25221
FX-53 (ClawHammer): |RickY| & Pedro Rocha - 3602.8 MHz http://resources.vr-zone.com/ocdb/da...tel_or_amd=amd
FX-55 (San Diego): Shamino - 4026.33 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=24489
FX-55 (ClawHammer): |RickY|&Pedro Rocha - 4005.23 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=10680
FX-57: MemoryExtremeTeam - 4101.98 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=56028
FX-60: mikeguava - 3868.82MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75052
X2 3800+: Hoschi - 3602.6MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=62810
X2 4200+: sson74 - 3557.12 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=80775
X2 4400+: Fosco - 3408.27 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=62072
X2 4600+: Onepagebook - 3687.15 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78999
X2 4800+: MikeGuava - 3560MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=72471
Opteron 144 (Venus): Overcrash - 3657.8 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=75334
Opteron 146 (Venus): MOSO - 3813 Mhz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=70263
Opteron 148 (Venus): Daniel - 3787.85 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=47280
Opteron 150 (Venus): Predator - 3600.9MHz - http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/799...0m373006ax.jpg
Opteron 154 (Venus): s7e9h3n - 4005.19MHz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=70094
Opteron 165 (Toledo): Nephilim - 3454.8 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=78027
Opteron 170 (Toledo): Absolute_0 - 3473.7 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=74927
Opteron 175 (Toledo): ixtapalapaquetl - 3420.73 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=80573
Opteron 180 (Toledo): cupra - 3450.99 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=76888
Turion MT-30 (Lancaster: Badong - 3000 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=81677
Turion MT-40 (Lancaster): ryan.crest - 2935.4 MHz http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1141651189
Sempron 2800+ (Paris): turez - 2498.25 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=38643
Sempron Mobile 3000+ : hs - 2972.41 Mhz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=69610
Sempron64 2500+ (Palermo): JunQiang - 3003.86 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75385
Sempron64 2600+ (Palermo): pawell262 - 3220.99 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=67685
Sempron64 2800+ (Palermo): fr@me - 3287.69 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=55087
Sempron64 3000+ (Palermo): fr@me - 3133.20 MHz http://overclockers.ru/cpubase/?action=details&id=12402
Sempron64 3000+ (Winchester): TiN_EOF - 3031.20 Mhz http://www.topmods.net/tin/3031.png
Sempron64 3000+ (Palermo): pr1nce - 3208.18 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=75376
Sempron64 3100+ (Palermo): STEELBALLZ/MARTAKIS - 3144.31 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=75165
Sempron64 3200+: AeGis - 3065.32 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78404
Sempron64 3300+ (Palermo): XFXGeforced - 2843.9 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=78287
Sempron64 3400+: fr@me - 2928.95 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=66864

:roll: so much for your's and others theories :roll:

http://img160.echo.cx/img160/9310/104112ht.jpg - Damn, I was hoping to break 10GB/s first w/ DDR1 :( 

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

So those all the validated records of overclocked AMDs.


Mike, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 processors if are overclockable with extreme cooling doesn't mean that all other millions can do the same. In fact only few AMD processors can reach +30% with standard cooling. And why to spend more money for cooling, when you can buy better CPU with standard cooling???????
Most of those K8 CPUs are using dry ice cooling and have their cold bug at lower tmeperature, so they can run. Have you ever made a session with dry ice? Do you know at what temperature is the cold bug of your AMD K8?
Anoter thing is that K8 is not designed to achieve high freqfencies(its has short pipelines), and the used materials are limiting the switching speed of its transistors as much as their size. When are you going to realise that?
Prescotts are less limited by the freqfency and more buy the temperature.
They don't have integrated memory controller, so they don't have cold bug. They are more overclockable with "apropriate" unstandard cooling(liquid nitrogen rullz).
April 12, 2006 11:08:25 AM

MMM, let me help you and others like you that are thinking that is simple and easy to achieve those records, you are always posting.
Here is the Opteron 146 running at 3813MHz using dryice cooling.


Opteron 146 (Venus): MOSO - 3813 Mhz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=70263
Now, see how many people are doing the session, see how it looks like, and some other intersting pics:







Many hours and people(the Serbian XtremeOC team) were needed to prepare this session and make this Venus running only few minutes at that freq.
And its best SuperPi 1M results(22.703s) were achieved at 3650MHz (10x365) at 1.75v using an amasing BH-5 modules and DFI LanParty NF4 Ultra.(http://img508.imageshack.us/my.php?image=227039jf.jpg)
How many of us have their machines running like this one?
!