The xbox 360 is the best value for money in terms of gaming systems. To have a comparable PC, you're going to spend $2000+. You'll spend more on the graphics card for the PC than you'll spend on the 360.Actually none of them can right now, I dont see any chips oyt therer with 10 megabytes of cache on die. Some of the current chips are getting really close to the same performance such as the radeon xt1900xtx.
A 7800GT would match it on the nVidia side.
The XBOX just has an ATI GPU right? And it can only be as fast as what was out 6 months ago when the thing was launched. PCs are already on the next generation and faster. The 7900GTX of course blows it away.
Nothing out is on par with the 360. It's got two gpus[ at 500mhz I think] and Unified shaders. I have heard that it's the first DX10 gpu and is beyond sm3.
The thing is it's not just a gpu, the whole thing is a dedicated gaming system. It can't be viewed outside of the whole, if you put it a pc it wouldn't even work as it is.
The x1900 may beat it on paper but will never see optimization. No one out there has a os and game made just for your system. By the time you start really use the cards potential it's old news. Your OS takes up alot of resources Just look at halo and what a pc needed to play it at xbox levels.
The original XBox was a lowly Pentium 3 (either a 700 or 733) with 64 MB of RAM that was shared with a video card that was about equal to a GeForce3. If you think a PC with those specs will play Halo or Halo 2... well, you're living on another planet.
In all other respects it is a P3. Since that's the only Celeron specific trait I'm sticking with my original analysis. The 133 FSB wasn't found on Celerons until much later. Give it up old timer!
Game consoles are budget, regardless how much they cost. Keep in mind, to fully enjoy XBOX360, you need a HDTV, if you don't have one, you will probably buy one. A good one costs about $1000 (here in Canada), plus the 360, it'll end up costing as much as new rig. I'll say PCs are better than gaming consoles, but it's personal preference.
Game consoles are budget, regardless how much they cost. Keep in mind, to fully enjoy XBOX360, you need a HDTV, if you don't have one, you will probably buy one. A good one costs about $1000 (here in Canada), plus the 360, it'll end up costing as much as new rig. I'll say PCs are better than gaming consoles, but it's personal preference.
Interesting...Specs are similar to the X1900 XT... not sure about clockspeeds, maybe the XTX is closer.
With your understanding, the X1900 XT is only 4X as powerful than a Geforce 3.Processing Powerhouse
The custom-designed Xbox 360 central processing unit (CPU) runs at a breakneck speed, thanks to its three separate core processors that clock in at 3.2 GHz each.
Xbox 360 boasts a custom ATI graphics processor that clocks in at a blistering 500 MHz. If you want to get even more technical (and who doesn't?) Xbox 360 can take advantage of more than four times as many polygons as the original Xbox® console, and more than four times (seeing a pattern here?) the number of pixels per second.
With your understanding, the X1900 XT is only 4X as powerful than a Geforce 3.