Meperidine

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
12
0
18,510
I am very close to buying a new system and the price difference between the FX57 and the FX60 is nominal. According to this chart: http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html the FX57 actually does better with graphics/gaming (I think). I realize the FX60 is dual core but, will that really matter to me if my primary concern is gaming? Or should I save a few hundred dollars and get a slower processor in favor of faster video cards (SLI)? Hurry with those opinions . . . I've got the "got to have it now" fever!
 

Meperidine

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
12
0
18,510
I have read several references to the Opteron on this forum but I gotta tell ya. I'm not into the overclocking thing. I will be buying this system from either ABS or Cyberpower and if I overclock there goes my warranty . . . right? And, I don't know if they offer systems with the Opteron. I'll check into it. In the mean time can you tell me about the Opteron? Is it dual core? Why isn't it in the main stream? Will it use the same mobo as the FX's?
 

chuckshissle

Splendid
Feb 2, 2006
4,579
0
22,780
You should buy the 4800+ if you want dual core. I have the same and I'm very happy with it. Im able to overclock it more, but I return it to default cuz its' already fast. I play games like BF2 and FEAR most of the time and this cpu is just amazing and super fast. FX-60 are faster but it's just too expensive. So get a dual core X2 like the 4800+ and get some good water cooling for it. :D
 

Meperidine

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
12
0
18,510
That's the thing . . . I don't know if I want or need dual core. I can save some bucks by getting single core and get two 512mb gforce7900GTX cards instead of the dual core with two 256 gforce 7900GTs. Where would the money be better spent? GPU or CPU?
 

luminaris

Distinguished
Dec 20, 2005
1,361
0
19,280
Most prebuilt machines I've ever seen have the BIOS locked and can't overclock anyway. I'm sure there probably are some that you can buy that will allow overclocking. I've always built my own systems so, I don't know if there are any out there.
 

davesphone00

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2006
19
0
18,510
If I had to choose between the FX-57 with two Nvidia 7900 GTX 512MB cards or the FX-60 and two Nvidia 7900 GT 256 MB cards, I would definitely take the FX-57 and the two hottest Nvidia cards. First, you'll be able to transfer those video cards into an upgraded system further down the line. FX-57 and FX-60 are the last of their kind before AMD switches to their new AM2 platform. Second, SLI physics is right around the corner. When the new drivers come out, physics calculations that are usually processed in the CPU will be transferred to spare processing power in your GPU's. Everyone knows that, for gaming, it's all about the video cards.
 

Meperidine

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
12
0
18,510
Actually, in order to keep the price where I want I would have to go with a 64 4000 or a 64X2 3800 . . . If I went with the dual 7900GTXs. Sorry to bounce back and forth here. I am looking for that "sweet spot" between optimal CPU and GPU. If I go with dual 7900GTs I would definitely go with the FX60. So, what I am looking for now (to stay in my budget) is: If you had a choice between the following three systems which is the best for gaming:
1. FX60 with dual 256mb 7900GTs
OR
2. 64 4000 (2.4 ghz) with dual 512mb 7900GTXs
OR
3. 64X2 3800 (2.0 ghz) with dual 512mb 7900GTXs
All of the other components are the same ASUS A8N32 SLI, 2gigs Corsair XMS RAM, 2 - 74 gig WD Raptor in RAID 0, 80 gig storage drive, 2 - DVD drives (one burner, one read only)
 

Studj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
2
0
18,510
Expensive processors and SLI are both stupid and a waste of money. The difference to your gaming experience is so small its rediculous to double the cost of your machine. SO heres the deal, get the 4800 and ONE good video card. Your games will all run and look great. THEN in two years when hardware is twice as fast as it is today use the money you saved to buy a new gaming computer instead of wishing that you hadn't spent all that money on a machine that was only top of the line for 6 months.
 

pissclams

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2006
9
0
18,510
For gaming-
I'd recommend the Fx-60 core and twin 7900Gt's.

Right now the dual core won't benefit you in game (any benefit worth noting), however I've got to assume that it will benefit you before you are ready to upgrade again.
 

Meperidine

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
12
0
18,510
Are you saying to get the 4800X2 or, did you mean the 3800X2? The 4800 X2 is only 50 dollars less than the FX60. And, while you're at it what video card do you suggest?
 

Studj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2006
2
0
18,510
Actually you're right the 4800 is a bit expensive too. If all you want to do is play games and have them look good. Its not necessary to spend a fortune for that extra 15 fps or for the next higher resolution. I just built a system with the x2 4200 and a 7800 gt. Everything looks great, granted i can't run the latest games at 100% MAX everything. But pretty darn close at 1280x1024. Theres a point of diminishing returns when it comes to spending money on a gaming machine. Look at the performance charts and look for the big price jump for the latest generation or procs and video cards. Pick the hardware right before that jump and youll have a good machine that didn't break your bank.
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790
That's the thing . . . I don't know if I want or need dual core. I can save some bucks by getting single core and get two 512mb gforce7900GTX cards instead of the dual core with two 256 gforce 7900GTs. Where would the money be better spent? GPU or CPU?


I would go with a 4400+, the current sweet spot for non-OC systems. I love mine and it plays all the games super fast with a 7800GT OC. Now it even plays FEAR with the new nVidia driver. Going with the 4400+ also gives you a solid upgrade path to the FX60 next year.
 

CS986

Distinguished
Jun 30, 2005
28
0
18,530
Actually, in order to keep the price where I want I would have to go with a 64 4000 or a 64X2 3800 . . . If I went with the dual 7900GTXs. Sorry to bounce back and forth here. I am looking for that "sweet spot" between optimal CPU and GPU. If I go with dual 7900GTs I would definitely go with the FX60. So, what I am looking for now (to stay in my budget) is: If you had a choice between the following three systems which is the best for gaming:
1. FX60 with dual 256mb 7900GTs
OR
2. 64 4000 (2.4 ghz) with dual 512mb 7900GTXs
OR
3. 64X2 3800 (2.0 ghz) with dual 512mb 7900GTXs
All of the other components are the same ASUS A8N32 SLI, 2gigs Corsair XMS RAM, 2 - 74 gig WD Raptor in RAID 0, 80 gig storage drive, 2 - DVD drives (one burner, one read only)


I haven't heard first hand, but from what I have read, the registers in the video card are only @ 256 which doesnt allow the GPU to fully take advantage of the extra memory. I would be interested to see how many more fps you get out of 512 over 256.

I would personally choose the FX60, video cards come and go much more rapidly where as you should be able to hang onto the CPU for some time longer.