I have been hearing a lot of talk about AM2 and DDR2 for AMD not providing any large perf increase, but then after reading an AnandTech story about AMD I remembered that when Intel shifted to DDR2, they got little to NO INCREASE in speed.
Maybe that's why AMD waited patiently for lower latency higher speed. Well, now's the time as OCZ has released a 3-2-2-9 1000MHz DDR2 part. Lookign at the jump it provides for the tested 955, my initial opinion seems to be bearing some fruit.
I'm not saying Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah nyah, but people should have looked at what AMD did with the K7 on DDR - kick Intel's ASSSSS!
I may be an AMD fanboy if that means I used to have Intel chips but haven't since K7 and x64. Anyway, with RAm like OCZs newest, I am almost ready to bet a paycheck - that's a lot for good SW devs - on the 20% I predicted way back when.
I guess we'll see, but I keep telling people AMD will show no chip before it's time. Yes, that's a lame wine joke, btu fits the circumstances perfectly. And for those people who wonder why AMD is RAISING prices, I'd have to say because they can. Rev. F has more than AM2, so Sun and Google will still be eating up Opterons and AlienWare will still be sucking up FXs no matter what Intel does with Conroe/Woodcrest.
I really hope that Conroe is as good as it seemed, but even in cases where PD and P4 were ahead of A64 and A64 X2, my AMD systems were always snappier in general than my Intel systems - I couldn't convince die hard Dell folks at work to get AMD.
As Johnny Storm says,
Flame On!!
Maybe that's why AMD waited patiently for lower latency higher speed. Well, now's the time as OCZ has released a 3-2-2-9 1000MHz DDR2 part. Lookign at the jump it provides for the tested 955, my initial opinion seems to be bearing some fruit.
I'm not saying Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah nyah, but people should have looked at what AMD did with the K7 on DDR - kick Intel's ASSSSS!
I may be an AMD fanboy if that means I used to have Intel chips but haven't since K7 and x64. Anyway, with RAm like OCZs newest, I am almost ready to bet a paycheck - that's a lot for good SW devs - on the 20% I predicted way back when.
I guess we'll see, but I keep telling people AMD will show no chip before it's time. Yes, that's a lame wine joke, btu fits the circumstances perfectly. And for those people who wonder why AMD is RAISING prices, I'd have to say because they can. Rev. F has more than AM2, so Sun and Google will still be eating up Opterons and AlienWare will still be sucking up FXs no matter what Intel does with Conroe/Woodcrest.
I really hope that Conroe is as good as it seemed, but even in cases where PD and P4 were ahead of A64 and A64 X2, my AMD systems were always snappier in general than my Intel systems - I couldn't convince die hard Dell folks at work to get AMD.
As Johnny Storm says,
Flame On!!