My last post about hdd's was that hitatchi is developing a 5 terabyte 3.5 inch hdd for a release scheduled in 2010.
Now that I know so many people who experienced a hdd crash why are they still developing storage devices running on moving parts? First of all the world is screaming about energy saving (how many hdd power eating pc's world wide?) and about polution (crashing hdd's) that screws up our planet. Would it not be time with nowadays technoligy to make some replacement for the hdd the way it is now or is there just too much money envolved in it? I know it should be possible. Maybe someone has read about some new development stuff about this? I'm not talking about gigabytes ram module kind of solutions cause that just won't solve the nowadays storage needs that can end up in 300 gb's or more.
ps: wont it make our pc's just faster afterall?
Now that I know so many people who experienced a hdd crash why are they still developing storage devices running on moving parts? First of all the world is screaming about energy saving (how many hdd power eating pc's world wide?) and about polution (crashing hdd's) that screws up our planet. Would it not be time with nowadays technoligy to make some replacement for the hdd the way it is now or is there just too much money envolved in it? I know it should be possible. Maybe someone has read about some new development stuff about this? I'm not talking about gigabytes ram module kind of solutions cause that just won't solve the nowadays storage needs that can end up in 300 gb's or more.
ps: wont it make our pc's just faster afterall?