x1900xtx blizzard wc

i_am_not_god

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2005
90
0
18,630
K lads, im about to buy a new graphics card, 6800 ultra is just to hot, and cant play new games on high anymore :(. Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter is coming in may, so its time to get a new card. I was thinking either 7900 GT, since i saw that they got the ram over 2ghz, which is impresive :eek:, or x1900xtx blizzard watercooled. so which 1?, OR should i just wait till the dx10 cards come out? want GRAW to run flawlessly if possible.
 

nottheking

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2006
1,456
0
19,310
Well, if you're eagerly awaiting Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter, don't be holding your breath for DX 10 cards, as it appears that both ATi and nVidia are going to make us wait until at least the fall. Heck, both of them still have more DirectX 9 cards planned for later this year. (such as an X1700XT and 7900GS)

As for the cards out there right now, it depends on the price you're willing to pay. No card actually comes with memory even APPROACHING 2.0GHz DDR. The 7900GT actually defaults to GDDR3 @1.2GHz, and the 7900GTX is @1.6GHz.

As for the actual performance of each card, it seems little can actually best an X1900XTX Blizzard. Technically, some of the overclocked 7900GTX cards may argue with it, but the Blizzard does actually seem to win a fairer share of the rounds. Of course, it's also much more costly.

To be honest, I'm not sure how GRAW will play out here. I know that the makers claim to lean toward nVidia, but that has more to do with nVidia's marketting campaigns than the actual performance of their cards with the game. The last known Tom Clancey game, Splinter Cell 3: Chaos Theory, proved to perform a bit better on ATi's hardware, but this is a whole different series, with a different gameplay style, and hence a different emphasis on the graphics; there's little need for the insane attention to lighting detail seen in Chaos Theory.

However, I'm certain that whatever card you choose, be it the X1900XT, XTX, XTX Blizzard, or the GeForce 7900GT or 7900GTX, that it will perform fine. Even at 1600x1200, the only games that seem to drop any of those cards below 60fps are F.E.A.R. and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. (though some might rightfuly point out that at those games, the X1900 cards can still pull close to 60fps, and leave the GeForce cards in the dust in the meanwhile)

I doubt that GRAW will be as draining, though.
 

i_am_not_god

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2005
90
0
18,630
they overclocked the 7900gt to 2ghz memory, doesnt come stock like that. So i guess im gonna go with the 1900xtx blizzard.
I only gonna run at 1280x1024 max so it looks ok for me :) thanks for the reply
 

i_am_not_god

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2005
90
0
18,630
3 slots is ok since i got a sli board so its not gonna be used for anything :). I wanted the blizzard version cause it is watercooled, and i really dont need to water cool the rest of my system since my cpu temps are pretty low.

edit: the card only takes up 2 slots, 1 for the card, 1 for the watercooling bit, the water cooling bit doesnt have to be next to the card either, so u can put a 120mm fan to blow on the ram heatsinks i guess to get them up some more if it wud do anything at all.
 

i_am_not_god

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2005
90
0
18,630
just had a look at the andatech review of the 1900xtx blizzard. IMO, the cooling on it sucks, didnt relize it was so bad, the temps still reached 90c?
I dunno what card to get now, 1900xtx or 7900gt or gtx leaning towards the gt price/oc ability, even thou price aint really important since i can get discounts on hardware. What do you guys think?