Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (
More info?)
I am tottaly behind you on privacy. What if you become a suspect in
some sort of crime. and you are tottaly innocent and you calls innocent
as they may be are tooken wrong. If OJ simpson can get off and Bush can
become presedent then dam it there is something wrong.
there is no need for a operator to really have this information. they
could have limited information and still do there job fine.
You leave your doors locked or open expect to be robbed
you take any effort at all to avoid problems do it. next time you are
in radio shack refuse to give your information. they will not stop you
from buying. I do it all the time. They will use it agist you later.
you call alot out of state expect a slew of calls to sell you
longdistance. buy alot of on sale items expect calls on itesm they
want to clear out. or like I hear big walmart type big box stores are
rf tag doing. where if you just buy items on sale they will eventualy
not spend any energy on you anymore treat you diffrently. scary but
thous pants you bought at walmart are giving off a number and the saver
card in your wallet screams your identy where ever you go and there is a
rf reader.
Bye bye privacy.
Hellow controled jail police state.
where you going , why, how long, can I see your papers please.
Infowars.com
whatreallyhappened.com
evolution suffers
wkearney99 wrote:
>>who honestly cares. if anybody wants to know who i'm talking to, just
>>call me up and ask.
>>
>>i just called my mom.
>
>
> And how about if your call data was used in some manner that invaded your
> privacy? Like calling you a mama's boy for all those conversations to your
> mother? Or to a doctor for some condition you'd rather not have shared?
> Sold to a catalog company bent on sending you junk mail for it? Seriously,
> think about how 'data' such as that can be used against someone, especially
> when taken out of context. Would you want your boss, on seeing your
> frequent calls to your mother, to start making decisions about your work
> because of it? Would you want someone looking at your mothers records and
> using them to perperate some scam on her?
>
> There's a big difference between calling someone up and asking and slicing
> and dicing their call data records. You can refuse to answer when asked, as
> most folks would, but how would you untangle the database-driven errors that
> would crop up from your call records?
>
>
>>and seriously, if you don't want vonage support looking at your call
>>records, don't call them. trust me, somebody at your local POTS is
>>just as able to see your current records
>
>
> What actual carriers are required to do or not do is dictated by
> regulations. That they CAN see the data isn't a surprise, what they're
> bound by law against doing with it is another matter.
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram