Does anyone have an opinion, for both Mech CAD work & Gaming which would be better?
Single Core Xeon 3.0GHz 3.0 Xeon, 800FSB, 1MB, EMT64,
(with an FX3400)
Or a:
Dual Core p4 3.2Ghz 640HT ......
Any opinions?
hmmm, between those two, i'd probably say the pentium D (i am assuming you are referring to this processor since you said it's dual core). as someone said above, there is no dual core that is a pentium 4. it has been renamed for dual core. i'd reccomend you wait to see what's coming out soon from intel. the improvement gains from the next generation of processors is supposed to be significant. even if you don't decide to buy those, the prices might come down even more on current options. so either way, waiting is a good thing if you can. i'd reccomend an amd system, but not so close to the release of something new. good luck with that.
The Pentium 4 is a single core CPU with Hyper threading, not dual core.
My Bad... I was thinking HT not dual core... no, it's not a Pentium D...
So, an HT will just appear as two processors in task manager?
If, as someone said that the Xeon has HT, why doesn't this appear as two processors in task manager?
Hmmm... Now I'm confused then...
Task manager will show two logical processors, if HT is enabled. However, due to numerous report that HT actually slows the entire system, i think most Xeon / P4 have HT disabled as default.
I wouldn't recommend you to buy P4 / Xeon right now, since Cores are just around the corner, and their performances are a lot better than P4 / Xeon.
when i worked in corporate CAD america, we always had dual xeon workstations. real hard to lock up, but we tried
the hyperthreading i don't think is that great, the true dual core responds better when you have multiple tasks going on. you know how it goes, it locks up at the worst times sometimes.
i have a 3.06 with HT in a shuttle that i used to replace a single CPU xeon, 2.4 ghz in a tyan workstation motherboard. about the same speed, 1/4 the size. i like the 3.06 but it doesn't have the "neck snapping whip cracking" response of the AMD opteron 175 i just got.
i think the cheap pentium dual, what is it, the 805, would be worth considering. 2.66 ghz about, like having a dual 2.66 xeon, for cheap, not a bad deal.
i'm not going to try and talk you into an AMD.
if you're paying the electricity bills for a CAD design office, the 805 is probably better power consumption wise.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.