Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (
More info?)
"Rex" <Rex@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OZcVJPfZFHA.2376@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Just realised, the focal point of my original post is
> solely related to Loss of files & any other loss that would
> make my computer react in any different way that what I am used to.
> I catagorise this as "lost, tampered with, half-available, corrupt,
> or cannot be found" file loss. (very irritating when unnecessary)
> I have many many Utilities whereby the registry is working
> overtime doing its job, so I would like to know if the over-write
> takes all of this into consideration......... Drivers as well.
> Also, are all previous microsoft 'updates' Adopted by the new
> S.E?
>
> I like to get things right the first time, it saves all of the
> aggro during the obvious following repairs.
>
> thanks
>
> ..Rex..
> "Menno Hershberger" <mhersh22@nosuchplace.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9667630FA4D15butter@daisymae.com...
>> "Rex" <Rex@hotmail.com> wrote in news:#t$rH1eZFHA.3712
>> @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > I have a copy of 98SE which I would like to instal
>> > over the top of my existing 98, but I do not want
>> > to lose even a morsel of what is on my comp/system.
>> > It is a dual boot with XP.
>> >
>> > Yes, No, Maybe.
>> > Its the 'maybe' that I am posting for, regarding loss or probability
>> > of loss. (& any examples of possibilities)
>>
>> If 98 is on C, and XP on another drive, no problem. When you get done,
>> you'll notice that Windows (98) will be on top of XP in your boot menu.
> You
>> can change that back from within XP if you want.
>>
>> --
>> --- A Freudian slip is when you say one thing but mean your mother. ---
>
>
the only problem with an over install is if you overwrite a file with an
older version ...google "dll hell"
you end up having to reinstall a bunch of software ...(personally , I wipe
my computer once or twice a year and build fresh :> )